Tag Archives: Salmon

New York Times: ISA Virus Now Found in Wild BC Coho!

Share

Read this report from The New York Times on the discovery of deadly Infectious Salmon Anemia virus in wild coho in a tributary of the Fraser River.

“In documents released Friday, an adult coho salmon supplied by salmon
advocates to a prominent laboratory showed signs of carrying the
disease. That fish was reported to have been found in a tributary of the
Fraser River, a critical salmon run for fishermen in Canada and the
United States.

Last week, researchers from Simon Fraser University in British Columbia
and elsewhere said that they had discovered the virus in 2 of 48
juvenile fish collected as part of a study of sockeye salmon in Rivers
Inlet, on the central coast of British Columbia. The study was
undertaken after scientists observed a decline in the number of young
sockeye.

Such a virus could have a deep impact on the survival of salmon in the
Pacific Northwest. Some scientists have suggested that the virus had
spread from British Columbia’s aquaculture industry, which has imported
millions of Atlantic salmon eggs over the last 25 years.” (October 28, 2011)

Read full article: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/29/science/pacific-salmon-virus-raises-worries-about-industry.html?_r=1

Share

Letter from an Alaska Fisherman: What is BC Going to do About ISAv?

Share

Read this letter from the executive director of the Alaska Trollers’ Association in the Vancouver Sun, wondering what BC plans to do about the discovery of deadly European Infectious Salmon Anemia virus in BC’s wild salmon.

“When Alaska banned fish farms, the top reason was to avoid disease
spreading to our wild stocks. What was at stake was no mystery: Norway
had already killed entire populations of wild fish due to parasites and
disease introduced by imported salmon. Our state wisely chose to avoid
such risk; yet folks to the south of us put us squarely in the path of
what Alaskans feared the most. As the representative of Alaska
fishermen who rely exclusively on the health of wild fish, I am appalled
by the near-silence of the Canadian agencies responsible to protect
them. I’ve reserved comment in hopes that they would send some signal to
the public, and West Coast fishermen in particular, that Canada is
proactively engaged with a “fish first” attitude.” (October 31, 2011)

Share

Alexandra Morton Wins Tyee’s “People’s Order of BC”

Share

Check out the Tyee’s “People’s Order of BC” winners – including top vote-getter Alexandra Morton.

“And that’s what we monkeys did here at The Tyee a couple of weeks ago. We launched
a new award called The People’s Order of B.C., a cheeky response to the
controversy surrounding this year’s actual Order of B.C. selections
where we asked you to nominate and then vote for your favourites…Originally from Connecticut, Alexandra Morton is a marine biologist best
known these days for her studies focusing on the impact of salmon
farming in the waters off British Columbia. Not only did Morton garner
the most votes, but she also garnered the most nominations — 20 in
total.” (October 31, 2011)

Read article: http://thetyee.ca/Tyeenews/2011/10/31/Peoples-Order-Winners/



Share
Chief Bob Chamberlin and salmon biologist Alexandra Morton display test results confirming ISAv is here in BC's wild salmon

Shades of Green: The Arrival of Infectious Salmon Anemia Virus

Share

PEI’s Atlantic Veterinary College – cited as the reference lab for Infectious Salmon Anemia – has confirmed that the virus has officially arrived in BC’s West Coast waters. Critics of open net-pen salmon farms have warned that this arrival was inevitable given the history of the disease’s spread from Norway to Scotland, Ireland, Canada’s East Coast and Chile via transported Atlantic salmon eggs used by the industry. Those who are closely attuned to the health of wild salmon and are skeptical of the official monitoring and testing protocols have suspected that ISAv has been here for several years.

The presence of ISAv in wild Pacific salmon is ominous, a threat that casts a foreboding shadow on the entire marine ecology supported by these iconic fish. The disease is highly infectious, prone to mutation and potentially lethal. As an exotic disease previously unknown in the Pacific Northwest, its effect could cause havoc, shaping indefinitely the direction and focus of conservation efforts. The economic, social and ecological costs could be staggering. In short, ISAv’s arrival – almost certainly courtesy of the salmon farming industry – is a potential catastrophe.

As usual, the industry is minimizing the significance of ISAv’s arrival on the West Coast. As a Marine Harvest environmental officer said, “Just because it is present in these Pacific salmon doesn’t mean it’s a health issue…Pacific salmon are not as affected by ISA as Atlantic salmon” (Postmedia News, Oct. 19/11). Indeed. The industry’s gift of ISAv to Canada’s Maritimes is now creating the same problems that salmon farming has caused Europe, probably the near extinction of a population of wild Atlantic salmon in Nova Scotia’s Bay of Fundy. Meanwhile, the industry’s gift to coastal BC is just beginning to be measured.

So, what is the meaning of “Pacific salmon are not as affected by ISA as Atlantic salmon”? The underweight wild smolts identified with ISAv came from BC’s Rivers Inlet, a sockeye rearing area that has declined in five years from Canada’s second largest producer to 1 percent of its historical output – and it’s 100 km from the nearest salmon farm. On the banks of the Fraser River, thousands of unspawned dead sockeye salmon are washing ashore, apparently the victims of damaged livers. Are these some of the “not as affected” effects? In the complex, stressful and unforgiving dynamic of wild salmon surviving a dangerous life at sea and then heroically struggling up their nascent rivers to spawn, “not as affected” can be a lethal handicap.

The 4,726 tissue tests of farmed salmon over eight years, the industry contends, found no evidence of ISAv, although critics say a series of at least 35 reports from provincial government labs have indicated its presence in BC waters – a curious anomaly that is consistent with the self-serving interests that have occupied the industry. Almost without exception, these corporations have shown little more than a token concern for the marine environment that houses their open net-pens. Their public relations strategy has been to minimize their image of environmental damage. Sea lice are natural to marine ecologies, therefore persistent and concentrated infections in open net-pens on the out-migration routes of vulnerable wild salmon smolts are deemed normal. Viral diseases are found in natural ecologies, therefore dense infections that spread billions of viral particles from infected farmed salmon into the surrounding ocean are also normal. Seals and sea lions inevitably die, therefore the wholesale slaughter of them by the thousands is normalized with such a dismissive term as “cull”. If the industry viewed BC as anything other than a place to make money, it would have taken steps years ago to reform its practices and eliminate its environmental impacts.

The response of the industry to the newly discovered presence of ISAv in wild West Coast salmon is typical. Says Marine Harvest’s environmental officer – a self serving title that is conspicuously oxymoronic – “As far as we know [Marine Harvest] is clean of this disease and we want to keep it that way” (Ibid.). Of course they do. Given the industry’s $2 billion fiasco with ISAv in Chile, keeping “clean” of the disease is the primary objective. But the real issue of concern is not the business of growing farmed salmon but the health of the entire West Coast marine ecology and its keystone species. Significantly, the initiative to test the Rivers Inlet sockeye didn’t come from the industry or their government supervisors but from Simon Fraser University fisheries statistician Rick Routledge, at the urging of Alexandra Morton.

The next steps of the salmon farming corporations are predictable. They will concede that the information is interesting but that further study is needed. They will argue that identification of the European strain of ISAv found in two of the 48 sockeye smolts from Rivers Inlet could be a mistake or was too small to be meaningful. Or they will argue that the sample was contaminated or misidentified by an unexplainable anomaly. As in the past, their operative strategy will be to deny, delay and obscure.

Because the ISAv was detected in Rivers Inlet’s out-migrating sockeye smolts, this means the virus has likely been in BC waters for at least several years and is now firmly established in the ecosystem. Fish pathology indicates that it may also be in the Fraser River watershed. Indeed, it may now be endemic in BC’s marine ecology. Salmon farming corporations have released this monstrous little genie from its bottle and no amount of effort is likely to capture it.

As for what’s next, brace for a long, slow, tortuous and complicated catastrophe. This uncontrollable contagion could spread southward to California and northward to Alaska via infected herring, wild salmon and other fish species.

Share

New York Times: Salmon Virus – Where Do We Go From Here?

Share

Read this important New York Times Green Blog where we go from here, having discovered deadly European Infectious Salmon Anemia virus in BC’s wild Pacific sockeye.

“The Atlantic Veterinary College
at the University of Prince Edward Island, which generated the positive
results, is the global reference lab for the disease — ‘the best there
is,’ according to James Winton,
the fish health section chief at the United States Geological Survey
Western Fisheries Research Center. ‘I have to believe that the results
are highly credible,’ he said. Assuming the disease is present,
the next immediate question is where it came from. Dr. [Daniel] Pauly suggests
that the virus’s introduction to British Columbia was an inevitability
associated with the aquaculture industry…

…Dr. Pauly said that time was of the essence and that action was being
delayed by discussion and debate. ‘We’re still in public relations
mode,’ he said. ‘But it’s a potential catastrophe — public relations
will not help in this.'”
(Oct. 23, 2011)

http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/23/a-salmon-virus-where-do-we-go-from-here/

Share
Citizens speak truth to corporate and government power at

“Good Corporate Citizen”? No Such Thing – Especially in Fish Farm Business

Share

See those two dots – one says corporate decency (underneath it says “good corporate citizen”).
 
The other dot says democracy, the rule of law and responsive government.
 
These two dots are joined to make up the dot that says “what a pile of bullshit!”
 
We have to get used to the truth: no company gives a rat’s ass about corporate decency – in fact it’s naïve for us think there might be. The corporation owes allegiance to just one thing: the bottom line – profits and dividends. In fact, corporations are only as decent as the law and enforcement of the law makes them be. They are like most motorists – they obey the laws because if they don’t and are caught, there are consequences.
 
The BC Liberal government has no intention of making laws that govern the way their donors do business and even if they do we all remember how the fish farms got fined for breaking environmental laws and how the Campbell government gave them their money back.
 
The Federal government is even worse than Victoria because they don’t have to care. Remember a year or two ago the feds gave $75,000 to Plutonic Power, the rapacious private power company that’s General Electric in drag! A little gesture of goodwill to Warren Buffett and the boys, you know.
 
Since John Cummins left the Tories they haven’t a single MP that knows anything about fish farms except John Duncan, who ran on the basis of supporting them and was rewarded with a parliamentary secretaryship. It’s more than that of course – the federal Fisheries Act set up the DFO as the “policeman” and at the same time mandates that it support, even promote fish farms! They will do dick-all (sorry to all you decent dicks out there!)
 
This brings me to the unhappy conclusion that nothing will happen to fish farms even though they have been caught re-handed importing ova with Infectious Salmon Anemia (ISAv).
 
Why would the companies do anything? What the hell do they care about Pacific Salmon, even though their wind-up doll, Mary Ellen Walling, on command, will spout their mantras of undying love for the soul of this province.
 
For Marine Harvest and their colleagues, it’s business as usual – lie, obfuscate and play the old game which puts the onus on us, the citizens that care. The Precautionary Principle, though supported by the UN and Canada, in theory, will just be ignored. That’s part of their modus operandi and they will stick with a tactic that’s working.
 
Don’t for a single moment think that the BC Salmon Farmers Association will lift a finger – hell, they will continue lying since that’s all they know.
 
The provincial government, which hasn’t come within 10,000 km of telling the truth throughout this whole sorry business has seen its jurisdiction to enforce go to the DFO, although they still control the ocean tenures for the farms.
 
I hope you don’t laugh at me for even mentioning any role for the federal government. They have been rotten managers of our fish since Confederation and have no desire to change – and won’t.
 
The only tack we can take now is public information and public action such as boycotting. This has proved effective but we must turn it up several notches – and our case has been much strengthened.
 
There is, of course, the law. We can consider class actions, although I’m simply not sure of my ground here – I believe that citizens must show a common interest in the Pacific salmon and find someone who’ll take the case on a contingent basis, which is to say he’ll take a percentage if he wins but nothing if he loses.
 
There is a very big plus arising out of the finding of this disease: we know that the two governments and the companies have the morality of an alley cat – oops, I’ll be getting a libel suit from the cat fraternity if I’m not careful!
 
PS What should happen?
 
The same thing that happened with mad cow disease – destroy the fish pronto and cancel all licenses. I say that and I haven’t even had my first drink of the day!
 
 

Share

Press Release: NDP Federal Fisheries Critic Fin Donnelly Calls on Harper Govt. to Address Salmon Virus

Share

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OCTOBER 20, 2011

NDP: MINISTER OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS MUST TAKE ACTION TO PROTECT BC SALMON

OTTAWA – Today in Question Period, NDP Fisheries and Oceans critic Fin Donnelly hammered Minister of Fisheries and Oceans Keith Ashfield on his government’s lack of response to reports of a potentially deadly salmon disease Infectious Salmon Anemia (ISAV) in British Columbia’s Pacific Ocean.
 
“While our US counterparts in Washington State are proposing amendments to an appropriations bill that would launch an emergency research effort into the risks and threats of the discovery of ISAV in our shared Pacific waters, our Minister of Fisheries and Oceans continues to sit on his hands,” said Donnelly. “Their lack of action on this important issue is becoming an embarrassment on the international stage.”
 
Donnelly wrote to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans in July, asking what measures were in place to determine and detect if ISAV, salmon leukemia, marine anemia or any other disease harmful to Canada’s wild salmon are present on the Pacific coast or at any stage of the industrial process. Months later the Minister responded with a letter outlining aquaculture management and a factsheet that claims that “no cases of ISAV have been identified in British Columbia.”

On Tuesday, Donnelly questioned the Minister in the House of Commons on what action the government has taken. The Minster offered a non-response and instead chose not acknowledge the emerging issue of ISAV.
 
“The Department of Fisheries and Oceans needs to take immediate action to determine the existence of this potentially devastating virus in BC waters,” said Donnelly. “While the Minister decides where to cut another $57 million from the department’s budget, he refuses to address the health of our already struggling wild salmon.”

Share

Press Release: Union of BC Indian Chiefs Calls for Immediate Action from Harper Govt on Salmon Virus

Share

Read this press release from the Union of BC Indian Chiefs calling for immediate action from the Harper Government on the recent discovery of deadly Infectious Salmon Anemia virus in wild BC sockeye.

“‘Wild salmon is central and integral to who we are as Indigenous
Peoples. With this startling announcement, it is imperative for the
federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans to take action. The
scientists have stated that this virus is highly contagious. It would be
ill-advised for DFO Minister Keith Ashfield and Prime Minister Stephen
Harper to wait for the recommendations of the Cohen Commission to
counter this virus emergency. At the very least, as a responsible
proactive measure, the Harper Government should immediately provide
emergency funding for comprehensive testing to find out how wide-spread
the virus is,’ said Grand Chief Stewart Phillip, President of the Union
of BC Indian Chiefs.” (Oct 20, 2011)

Share

What ISA Salmon Virus Did to Chile: Damien Gillis’ 2009 Photo Essay

Share

In the wake of the discovery of catastrophic Infectious Salmon Anemia in wild Pacific sockeye this week, The Common Sense Canadian revisits Damien Gillis’ 2009 photo essay documenting how the same deadly disease wiped out the Chilean salmon farming industry in a few short years. While Chile doesn’t have wild salmon like BC, the ISA outbreak wrought significant cultural and socio-economic devastation on the country. Now it threatens to destroy BC’s wild salmon stocks. Damien visited Chile’s Region 10 in September 2009, at the height of the crisis – here’s what he saw.

Click the image below to view the slide show.


{gallery}k2/galleries/1067/:300:225:1:2:lytebox{/gallery}

Share
Professor Rick Routledge of SFU

US Senators Demand Action on Salmon Virus While BC Counterparts Go Into Denial Mode

Share

Two items came across my desk yesterday that, taken together, illustrate just how embarrassingly backward our BC Liberal government is when it comes to matters of the environment.

One was a transcript from the BC Legislature, wherein NDP Fisheries Critic Michael Sather’s concerns about the discovery of a deadly European strain of Infectious Salmon Anemia virus (ISAv) in wild BC sockeye are egregiously downplayed by his Liberal counterpart, Agriculture Minister Don MacRae. The other was a story in the Seattle Times, documenting the calls for emergency action from 3 high profile US Senators in neighbouring Alaska and Washington State over the very same issue.

Here’s what Washington’s Democratic Senator Maria Cantwell had to say: “We need to act now to protect the Pacific Northwest’s coastal economy and jobs. Infectious salmon anemia could pose a serious threat to Pacific Northwest wild salmon and the thousands of Washington state jobs that rely on them. We have to get a coordinated game plan in place to protect our salmon and stop the spread of this deadly virus.”

Now here’s a transcript of what transpired in the BC Legislature on the same day US lawmakers were sounding the alarm – I’m including a significant chunk of this exchange because it so perfectly illustrates how out of touch this BC Liberal Government continues to be on the salmon farming issue, among many others:

M. Sather (NDP Fisheries Critic): The infectious salmon anemia virus has been discovered in wild salmon in Rivers Inlet. This is a potentially devastating disease that hasn’t been reported before in the North Pacific. The Chilean farming industry was devastated by this same virus: $2 billion in losses, production cut by half and 26,000 people laid off.

We have a lot more to be concerned about here in British Columbia as well. We have our world-renowned sport-fishing industry, our commercial industry and our First Nations food fishery.

Now, Dr. James Winton, who leads the fish health research group at the Western Fisheries Research Center in Seattle, called this outbreak a “disease emergency.” My question to the Minister of Agriculture is: does he agree with the assessment of Dr. Winton?

Hon. D. McRae (BC Liberal Agriculture Minister): Well, we’ve got another example of spinning media headlines and fearmongering from the opposition.

The reality is this. The lab results were sent to PEI. They were not following protocol when, instead of actually contacting CFIA, they went directly to SFU, which in turn went to the media.

When CFIA then, in turn, said, “We’d like to do our test samples,” and said, “We’d like to test the fish,” well, unfortunately, I’m advised that the tested-positive results at the PEI lab were destroyed, and therefore, not available to CFIA….

….M. Sather: Well, in my time in this House that has got to be one of the worst answers I have ever heard. The minister is really making a mistake in going this route.

Those fish were tested by the World Organisation for Animal Health. Now, if the minister wants to quibble with the worldwide body that’s responsible for fish health, go ahead — fill your boots — but you’re making a big mistake. And you’re making a big mistake about not taking what’s happening to our fish, our wild fish, our salmon farm fish in this province…You’re not taking it seriously, Minister, and you ought to be ashamed and apologize right now.

Mr. Sather is right. Dr. Fred Kibenge, who did the testing, is a man of peerless credibility on this matter. Out of the Atlantic Veterinary College at the University of PEI, he runs one of only two labs in the world approved by the OIE (the world animal health organization) to report ISAv. It is his lab that diagnosed and reported the Chilean outrbreak of ISAv several years ago. Mr. Sather is correct to suggest that questioning Dr. Kibenge’s credentials is a dead end for those who are foolish enough to pursue it.

As to Mr. MacRae’s other insinuations, I interviewed salmon biologist Alexandra Morton – who has been working with Professor Rick Routledge of SFU, who collected and forwarded the samples – by phone this morning and here’s what she told me about the testing procedure:

This past Spring, Prof. Routledge, concerned about low numbers of out-migrating smolts in the area of Rivers Inlet, collected 199 smolt samples to be tested at a later date. He had no idea at the time some of these fish would come back positive for ISAv.

The fish were stored in a freezer through the summer. In October the hearts of 48 of these fish were removed by Prof. Routledge’s assistant and sent directly to Dr. Kibenge’s lab (each test costs upwards of $40 and this is an operation with little to no funds, so only a quarter of the fish were tested). Under these circumstances, the heart was the most reliable piece of tissue on which to perform the testing.

Now, these are very small fish with very small hearts, so Dr. Kibenge used up all the tissue in the testing process. This contradicts what the BC Liberal Agriculture Minister alleged yesterday – that the samples were “destroyed”, which implies a cover-up of some nature. That’s simply not the case. As soon as the test results were confirmed, Dr. Kibenge alerted the CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), as per his legal responsibility.

Furthermore, earlier this week, officials from the CFIA showed up at Prof. Routledge’s SFU lab and confiscated the remaining 151 untested fish from the lab’s freezer. We can only assume they now have these fish in their possession, hearts and all.

All Prof. Routledge appears to have done is collected fish samples, where neither senior level of government would, and forwarded them to the top expert in North America for testing – which, in turn, revealed the devastating fact that a European strain of the deadly ISAv in now infecting BC’s wild sockeye.

Those are the facts.

Here are some more facts that shed light on the Province’s defensiveness. It is the BC Government that has been responsible for auditing fish health on salmon farms, up until the transfer of aquaculture jurisdiction to the federal government in January of this year. Incidentally, there is no evidence of any auditing process by any government body since April 2010 – when the fish farmers told the Province they no longer “required” its services (i.e., “Go away.”) And because fish health auditing is not a licensing requirement for the farms, they got away with it.

One man, Dr. Gary Marty, was responsible for the autopsies of fish from the farms in BC. The only person he ever showed his results to was Dr. Mark Sheppard, formerly of the Province as well. It was Sheppard who acted as the buffer between the raw data and what other government bodies and the public got to see.

The point is that much of what we’re discussing here is on the BC Government’s watch – which, like I say, may help explain their appalling defensiveness on the ISAv matter.

One other note, the person responsible for testing wild fish health in BC, Dr. Christine MacWilliams, asserted recently at the Cohen Commission on collapsing Fraser River sockeye, that if ISAv ever did show up in BC, it would be coming from fish farms – not from the wild. The fact that this is most definitely a European strain of ISAv should remove all doubt that this disease now hitting BC’s wild salmon comes from the fish farm industry.

What is gauling in the BC Agriculture Minister’s response to this crisis is his government’s utter disregard for the Precautionary Principle. US lawmakers are correct in their response – it’s time to go into emergency mode, not to bicker about testing protocols and worry about butt-covering.

Alexandra Morton is now calling for Dr. Kibenge to be provided the resources to come out to BC and set up an emergency lab on Vancouver Island to begin testing all species of wild and farmed salmon, as well as herring.

That’s a sound recommendation which both federal and provincial governments would do well to adopt post haste.

This is no longer a matter to leave to our backward, incompetent, self-interested BC Liberal Government. This is an international issue of grave import, as our neighbours to the south and north are reminding us. We have a duty to work with them to address this matter with the utmost sense of urgency.

As Michael Sather said, unlike the devastation of Chile by ISAv – which I personally documented in 2009 in my film “Farrmed Salmon Exposed” (Chile chapter begins at 2 min mark) – we have much more than the destruction of the aquaculture industry to worry about. This is about our wild salmon, which my colleague Rafe Mair aptly refers to as “the soul of our province.”

Share