Tag Archives: Oil and gas

Enbridge Ready for its Close-up: Pipeline Sparks Creative & Cultural Movement

Share

If there’s one thing – and I do mean one – that we can thank Enbridge for, it’s the way the company’s plan to bulldoze a massive crude oil pipeline from the Alberta Tar Sands to BC’s spectacular and rugged coast has inspired an increasingly creative and vibrant cultural movement in opposition to the project. It seems the company is caught in a Chinese finger trap – the harder they sell their scheme, the stronger the resistance grows. Indeed, the usual inducements – temporary jobs, bonus payments, and the recent dangling of 10% profit sharing to First Nations along the pipeline and tanker route – don’t appear to be gaining any traction this time around.

On the contrary, the project is awakening and drawing together coastal indigenous communities – celebrating their culture and connection to the land and water threatened by the proposal. It has attracted global focus from world-class photographers and major international media outlets. It’s helping to forge unprecedented close-knit relationships between First nations, conservation groups, and citizens around the province. And it’s spawned a boutique creative genre unto itself, characteristic of the new media era in which we live. That is, a plethora of films, photography, animation, music, and other artistic endeavours dedicated to showing Canadians and the world the incredible places and people at risk from the pipeline and associated supertankers.

In other words, this revolution is definitely being televised…and screened, streamed, podcast, social networked in powerful ways – and it’s only getting started. It has been my distinct privilege to be some small part of it.

This whole creative movement was on full display during a special event held as part of the Vancouver International Mountain Film Festival last month. A crowd of some 700 people crammed into the Centennial Theatre in North Vancouver to take part in “spOILed”, an evening filled with films, photography, and amazing guest speakers, each with an important story to tell (watch highlight video – story continues below).

Looking at the packed program (the event ran from 6:30 to nearly 11 o’clock) I wondered if it wouldn’t be a tad overwhelming for the audience – yet nearly everyone stayed to very end. And with good reason. They were treated to a veritable visual feast – juxtaposing spectacular natural images with the Tar Sands and myriad oil-related disasters of late that have only reinforced the concerns of Enbridge’s critics (three of these big spills from last year came from Enbridge itself, including the infamous disaster on Michigan’s Kalamazoo River).

The crowd also heard from some some terrific speakers throughout the evening, expertly emceed by one of the campaign’s tireless leaders, conservationist and photographer Ian McAllister of Pacific Wild. The event was co-sponsored by the International League of Conservation Photographers, a group of the world’s top photojournalists – many of them regular National Geographic Contributors – who journeyed to the Great Bear Rainforest last year. A sampling of their stunning work was on display throughout the evening.

Among the event’s highlights was renown photographer Garth Lenz – whose work Alberta bitumen cheerleader Ezra Levant has referred to as “Tar Sands Porn” (a high compliment, considering the source). Lenz has produced some of the most iconic images of the world’s largest industrial project, which he shared with the audience during a compelling presentation on the other end of the pipeline. An exhibition of Lenz’ work opened the day after this North Vancouver event at a major gallery in Los Angeles.

The audience was also treated to a presentation by enigmatic adventure filmmaker Frank Wolf on his 2,400 km journey from the Tar Sands along the proposed pipeline route to BC’s coast. Wolf previewed his upcoming feature documentary on the expedition – which he and a colleague made through a combination of hiking, paddling, and cycling over several months last summer.

Norm Hann, a veteran wilderness tourism guide in the Great Bear Rainforest, discussed his own unique journey by paddle board – a surf board-type device atop which he paddled 400 km along the the proposed pipeline route. He too is producing a documentary titled “Stand Up for the Great Bear Rainforest”.

Among the numerous other speakers throughout the evening was Marven Robinson – a spirit bear guide from Hartley Bay and impressive photographer in his own right. Robinson was instrumental in initiating the iLCP expedition to his traditional territory. He and Ian McAllister were the stars of the evening’s highlight – a new feature documentary by EP Films on the iLCP expedition and Enbridge issue. The film, SPOIL, claimed the environmental film prize at the Vancouver International Mountain Film Festival that week. SPOIL also features renowned Canadian photojournalist Paul Nicklen, who worked with Robinson on a forthcoming cover spread for National Geographic on the sprit bear.

South African photographer Thomas Peschak – one of the world’s top underwater cameramen and chief photographer for the Save Our Seas Foundation – reported in via video address from his latest shoot in the Middle East, highlighting some of the amazing work he did recently capturing the underwater life of the Great Bear Rainforest during the iLCP expedition.

Closing out the night was a stirring speech by Heiltsuk First Nation leader Frank Brown, thanking the above filmmakers and photographers for their work exposing the Enbridge battle to the world and calling on non-aboriginal people to join forces with First Nations to help protect the Great Bear Rainforest from oil tankers.

These films and projects are just a sampling of the creative bonanza Enbridge’s proposal has unleashed. And as the company, provincial and federal governments show no signs of throwing in the towel, one can only imagine the cultural connections and creative resistance they will continue to inspire.

So, smile, Enbridge: You’re on candid camera.

Share

Libya’s Gadhafi threatened to nationalize Petro-Canada operations: WikiLeaks

Share

From the Winnipeg Free Press – Jan 31, 2011

by Jim Bronskill

OTTAWA – A newly leaked U.S. diplomatic note says Libya
threatened to nationalize Petro-Canada’s operations in the North African
country over a spat with the Conservative government.

It’s the latest revelation in a bizarre international saga that first grabbed headlines two years ago.

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi cancelled a late September 2009
stopover in Newfoundland after Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon
promised a tongue-lashing for the hero’s welcome Libya extended to a man
convicted in the Lockerbie bombing.

The U.S. cable, obtained from WikiLeaks by British
newspaper the Daily Telegraph, says Libya’s state oil company called in a
senior Petro-Canada official with a threat to nationalize the firm’s
operations in Libya if Canada did not apologize.

At the time, Petro-Canada had just merged with fellow Canadian oil giant Suncor.

The cable says Canada’s ambassador to Libya, Sandra
McCardell — whose name is misspelled throughout — told the U.S. Embassy
in Tripoli the Libyans demanded the apology within 24 hours.

“McArdle said she has advocated some kind of public and
private statements from the Canadian (prime minister) and (foreign
minister), which would indicate a Canadian welcome for the Libyans and
hopefully turn the situation around,” the cable says.

“Libyans here are frantically calling the Canadian
Embassy, concerned that if the issue is not resolved, Gadhafi’s trip
home will be complicated by lack of a place to stop for necessary
refuelling.”

The Sept. 28, 2009, cable also says McCardell told her
U.S. counterpart that Ottawa had initially planned to refuse the
eccentric Gadhafi permission to stop on Sept. 29-30 in Newfoundland en
route to Spain from the United Nations.

“On instructions from Ottawa, McArdle said that she
informed the Libyan government in mid-September that Gadhafi was not
welcome to visit Canada at this time,” the cable says.

It adds that McCardell, who had just arrived in Tripoli
and had not yet presented her diplomatic credentials, seriously believed
she could become persona non grata or have her agreement revoked.

“Fearful of delivering bad news to Gadhafi, McArdle
explained that the notoriously slow Libyan bureaucracy delayed passing
Ottawa’s message to the Leader for several days.”

In the meantime, Canadian companies with business
interests in Libya “launched a furious lobbying effort” and persuaded
Stephen Harper’s Conservative government to allow the trip to go
forward, the note says.

“However, McArdle said that the Canadian government’s
precarious domestic situation and upcoming elections pressed the Foreign
Minister (Cannon) to go public with his very stern message.”

Though Gadhafi’s government did not follow through on its
apparent threat to take over Petro-Canada’s operations, a second
WikiLeaks cable obtained by the Daily Telegraph indicates it doled out a
milder punishment.

The Libyan government issued an order Sept. 30, 2009,
forcing Petro-Canada and its operator, Libya’s Hrouj company, to cut
production by 50 per cent, the note says.

The move came less than a day after McCardell had told
the U.S. ambassador that she and Libya’s foreign minister had settled
the issue.

The U.S. cable says while reasons for the production cut
were unknown, a source whose name is excised from the note “intimated
that the order had come from the highest levels, i.e. Moammar Gadhafi
himself.”

The move may be a “cheap” way for the Libyans to punish Petro-Canada for Ottawa’s gruff words, it adds.

Diplomats from Britain and Italy, nations with significant investments in Libya, appeared unsettled by the news, the note says.

Indeed, the earlier cable reveals both Britain and the
United States were prepared to intervene on Petro-Canada’s behalf “to
emphasize that it is not good for Libya to threaten existing and
potential investors and violate the sanctity of contracts with such
abandon.”

“The situation between the Libyans and the Canadians
reflects vintage Libyan policy to strike hard at any quarter that
insults the Leader publicly.”

In October 2009, Libya retaliated further, making it
clear that Canadian travellers were not welcome in the country by
refusing to grant visitor visas.

Read original article

Share

Harper’s Pipeline Nightmare

Share

What kind of year in politics is 2011 going to be? Very
likely another year (or at least ten months) of gridlock at the federal
level, with no sign of any so-called game changer on the horizon.

A spring election is looking less likely as
the Conservatives try to make a deal with the NDP — swapping its
support for the budget for increased support for seniors and hopefully a
halt to scheduled corporate tax cuts. Harper seems resigned to
remaining a minority government and doesn’t want an election. Canadians
are no more willing to give him a majority today than they were last
year or in the last election. As soon as a Harper majority appears
possible, a whole whack of voters change their minds and the
Conservatives go back to their maximum maintainable level of 36-38 per
cent.

So if there is so little meaningful action
on the parliamentary political front, we should look to
extra-parliamentary politics for action. And here the movement seems to
defy the polls. Because while environmental issues are still taking a
back seat to economic ones, it is on the environmental front that stuff
is actually happening. While the media seem to focus on the lack of
action on climate change, other enviro issues are witnessing intense
activity and campaigning by dozens of groups.

They have demonstrated that Stephen Harper,
a man who doesn’t like to blink, can be defeated when opponents fight
smart and are in for the long haul. The rejection of the B.C. Prosperity
copper-gold mine proposal and the saving of Fish Lake was a good
example. Approving the mine in the face of very effective publicity on
the part of opponents proved just too much for even Stephen Harper to
pull off. Defying many of the pundits’ predictions, the Conservatives
backed off and actually listened to their own environmental review
panel.

Coming down the pipe

While the fight isn’t over yet, Harper
faces another major defeat and it will happen this year. He will
confront another Fish Lake-like decision, except this time it is a much
bigger issue: the so-called Northern Gateway project, Enbridge
Corporation’s plan to construct a 1,200 kilometre pipeline (across 1,000
streams and rivers) that would carry unrefined bitumen from the tar
sands to Kitimat on the West Coast. That would result in some 200
supertankers a year loading the stuff up and taking it to markets in the
U.S. and Asia through the pristine and treacherous waters off the B.C.
coast.

Read full article here

http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2011/01/03/HarpersNightmare/

Share
Clean-up crews scramble early on to deal with the blow-out of BP's Deepwater Horizon oil well in the Gulf of Mexico - photo Carolyn Cole/LA Times

2010: Year of the Oil Spill

Share

As another year draws to a close, news outlets the world over are running down their lists of best and worst (fill in the blank) and biggest news stories of 2010. In the latter category, recent issues still fresh in our minds like WikiLeaks, the European debt crisis, the Heathrow fiasco, and the Chilean miners are likely to figure prominently. But make no mistake, 2010 was unquestionably the “Year of the Oil Spill.”

I wasn’t alive in 1962 at the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis, so I can’t begin to imagine what people felt during those 13 days of Cold War terror. But in my lifetime, the blow-out of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil well in the Gulf of Mexico is the single scariest event we’ve experienced. If you think that’s overstating things, let me explain.

Some would point to the financial crash of 2008, or 9/11, for that matter, as the most traumatic events in our recent history. But in neither case did we face such a fundamental threat to the planet itself, and thus our collective survival upon it. The BP tragedy saw us staring both literall and figuratively into the abyss.

An oil-soaked pelican in the Gulf of Mexico - photo Carolyn Cole/LA TimesIt is thus a testament to our 24-hour news cycle, tabloid-saturated, overworked, short attention spanned society that we have largely already forgotten the sense of sheer powerlessness and intense fear that gripped the world in the months of the Gulf crisis. It is with good cause that Gore Vidal uses the term “the United States of Amnesia.” 

I certainly have not forgotten what it was like to hear the daily reports tracing the dramatic upward arc in the scale of the disaster – from 1,000 barrels a day to 100,000 billowing into the Gulf; not ten days but over 3 months to stem the flow (of course there is no real end to the damage, much of it hidden beneath the surface by way of illegal, toxic chemical dispersants)…The exasperation of seeing, for a time at least, no way out of the whole sordid mess. Various increasingly far-fetched solutions – such as the much-parodied golf ball “junk shot” – left us wondering, “Is this really the best they can come up with?!”

We steadily came to realize that we could not trust one iota of what the mainstream media, the US government, and, most of all, BP, were telling us. We found ourselves sifting through youtube videos and purported “experts” on the fringes of the blogosphere, just to cobble together our own sense of what was really happening. Your yoga instructor or coworker were as likely to know the truth as was Katie Couric. Maybe this thin could never be stopped…Would it flow into the Gulf Stream, spreading its deathly red-black ooze all the way to Europe’s shores, destroying the whole Atlantic Ocean in the process?   

Crews work to clean up Louisiana beaches - photo Carolyn Cole/LA TimesAll the while, a slew of breathtaking images poured forth –
the oil-soaked sea birds, the multi-coloured slicks, captured from helicopters by the likes of National Geographic, that spread for hundreds of miles over the horizon.  And the live web-cam producing the single most iconic image of the year: that spewing underwater geyser – a constant, undeniable visual reminder of the havoc being wrought before our very eyes.

On it gushed, as ecosystems and livelihoods were lain waste. Economic damages ranged from $20 Billion and way up from there. The world’s best experts, one of its largest corporations, and its mightiest government all seemed powerless to stop it (while the CEO of BP produced a string of appalling soundbites that would have been comical if they didn’t highlight such a tragic disconnect with the widespread suffering his company was causing). These gut-punching images brought us face to face – in a way we hadn’t perhaps experienced since the Exxon Valdez, 21 years earlier – with the dirty business upon which we’ve all become so dependant.

But it wasn’t just the BP catastrophe that made 2010 the year of the oil spill. Far from it. 

Enbridge – the pipeline company currently proposing to pump over half a million barrels a day of Tar Sands bitumen across the heartland of BC, into supertankers on our North and Central Coast – had three major spills of its own, in MichiganIllinois, and New York State. The massive explosion of a tanker terminal in Dailan, China, produced some of the most graphic images – of any nature – ever recorded. The Boston Globe’s website carried a jarring reel snapped by a Greenpeace photographer that made the Gulf shots seem like Bob Ross canvases by comparison. 

A worker from Enbridge skims oil off the surface of the Kalamazoo River after a pipeline ruptured in Marshall, Michigan. (July 27, 2010) - photo Andre J. Jackson/MCTThe Gulf itself played host to a second rig explosion – lost in the shuffle o the BP fiasco. A collision between an oil tanker and heavy bulk carrier i the Malacca Straight, off the coast of Singapore, caused a leak of 15,00 barrels of crude oil. In September, disaster was narrowly averted when  tanker carrying 9 million litres of diesel fuel ran aground in the Canadian arctic.

Incidents in Mexico, the Middle East, and elsewhere exposed other vulnerabilities for fossil fuel supply lines – namely, crime and terrorism Thieves attempting to siphon off oil were blamed for the explosion of a Mexican pipeline that took 28 lives, while a Kurdish separatist grou claimed responsibility for the bombing of two pipelines in Turkey – on carrying natural gas, the other oil.

Meanwhile, various authorities and citizens in Tennessee were still dealing this year with the clean-up and lingering environmental effects o the disastrous bursting of a toxic coal ash tailing pond in Tennessee – a catastrophe 50 times bigger than the Exxon Valdez oil spill – that occurred at the tail end of 2008. In October, 2010, Hungary experienced a similar tragedy when a sludge reservoir at a metals plant burst, spilling som 35 million cubic metres of toxic waste on the town of Akja…And we end this year with a fresh round of alarms rung over leaking tailing ponds and the impacts of the Tar Sands on water, human and ecological health, and climate change.

Workers attempt to rescue a firefighter from drowning in the oil slick during the oil spill clean-up operations at Dalian's Port on July 20, 2010. (REUTERS/Jiang  He/Greenpeace)And those are just the big ones. A cursory study of the business of oil, gas, and coal exploitation and use reveals a litany of small-scale – bu nevertheless environmentally significant – pipeline leaks, tailing pond malfunctions, and myriad problems with the extraction, refining transportation, and burning of fossil fuels. They’re all just standar externalities – part of the cost of doing business, born by the planet, whil corporations reap record profits.

Many people – and pretty much every mainstream media outlet in the world – have failed to connect the dots, thus missing the lesson to be
learned from these very visible disasters in 2010. They see them as isolated incidents, rather than part of a larger systemic problem. 

The truth is, none of these disasters is an “accident” – rather they are manifestations of an until now largely theoretical concept known as “Peak Oil.” They bring us face-to-face with the real-world implications of this phenomenon. This is what happens when you’re scraping the bottom of the barrel for fossil fuel energy, which Barack Obama himself aptly referred to as “dirty, dwindling, and dangerous.”

Offshore wells like the Deepwater Horizon are being drilled at greater depths today, as easier sources dry up, presenting far greater operational and environmental risks.

The Alberta Tar Sands and their Venezuelan Orinoco counterpart are among the dirtiest and most capital and resource-intensive oil (or bitumen, rather) sources in the world.

Natural gas fracking is a relatively new and enormously damaging process, with severe impacts on our aquifers we’ve barely begun to grasp while we plough forward with new projects.

So long as we remain dependent on fossil fuels (which looks at this point to be a long time – as long as we can, that is), there will be ever-increasing BP blow-outs, pipeline leaks, and tanker crashes. Despite the assurances of the likes of Enrbridge that we have nothing to worry about with their new proposed projects, we have now seen irrefutable evidence, in gory, high-definition detail, of the inability of human beings to eliminate the risks that attend these operations.

My wish for the New Year is that these powerful images remain indelibly burned in our consciousness. I, for one, will continue to draw upon them in my work – not to score cheap emotional points, but to ensure they serve their purpose, namely, helping us to make better decision regarding our exploitation and use (and hopefully lack thereof) of fossil fuels going forward.

An aerial shot of the oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico - photo Carolyn Cole/LA TimesOne of the highlights of my 2010 was spending several weeks amid BC’ Great Bear Rainforest, traveling the very coastline Enbridge wishes to se plied by the world’s largest oil tankers. Having witnessed and documente firsthand the rugged terrain, navigational hazards, and extreme weathe along that stretch of coast – one of the most perilous on the planet – the mere contention that the company could guarantee the safety of thes shipments, or their ability to clean them up should they occur is, simpl put, so preposterous as to be insulting.

So it is heartening to see the lessons of the Exxon Valdez, BP blow-out and pipeline leaks being deployed in the battle to stop Enrbridge in BC With the recent passing of a federal motion(albeit non-binding, at this stage) for a North Coast tanker ban that would effectively kill that project were it made into legislation, and a growing coalition of First Nations, conservationists, and citizens standing together against the project, it appears we may be learning something after all.

So here’s hoping that 2011 is the year of conservation, clean energy solutions, and beginning to seriously confront our dangerous addiction to fossil fuels. Clearly, that’s naively idealistic – but we’ll always have February through December to be cynical about the future.

Share