Category Archives: Mining

Meeting Allows Raven Coal Mine Opponents to Give Views

Share

From the Times-Colonist – Feb 9, 2011

by Judith Lavoie

Opponents to new coal mines on central Vancouver Island will hold
their own version of a public hearing at the University of Victoria
tonight.

“This is the first major meeting in Victoria on this issue,” said Calvin Sandborn, Environmental Law Centre legal director.

The
centre, on behalf of CoalWatch Comox Valley, has asked the federal and
provincial governments for a joint independent expert review panel and
public hearings into the proposed Raven Underground Coal Project near
Buckley Bay.

But instead, government has decided to do much of the
decision-making behind closed doors, said John Snyder, CoalWatch
president.

“This meeting will not be as good a process as a full
public hearing by an independent panel of experts, but it may be the
best remaining chance for Islanders to express their concerns,” he said.

The
Raven application is likely the thin end of a wedge as the rich coal
seam, that stretches from Fanny Bay to near Campbell River, is already
sparking other applications, including plans for two open-pit mines,
Sandborn said.

“It could be the first step to turning the
mid-Island into a mini-Appalachia, and is that really what the people of
Vancouver Island want?” he asked.

The shellfish industry around Fanny Bay and groundwater could also be put at risk, Snyder said.

The meeting is at 7 p.m. in Room 159 of the Murray Fraser Building at UVic.

Read original article

Share

CBC Video: Uranium spill sends ship back to B.C.

Share

From CBC – Jan 17, 2011

Regulators have boarded a ship carrying uranium in B.C. waters,
figuring out how to handle a spill of radioactive material in the ship’s
hold.

The ship left Vancouver just before Christmas, bound for China. It is
carrying powdered uranium concentrate from the Saskatchewan mining
company Cameco.

But bad weather during the Pacific crossing caused two drums of
uranium to spill into the cargo hold, prompting the crew to turn the
ship back to British Columbia.

The uranium is safely contained within the ship’s hold, Cameco spokesman Rob Gereghty said Monday.

“We’re going through an assessment process right now but the hatch
was sealed once the uranium was found to be on the floor,” Gereghty
said. “We requested the ship to come back so that we could assess,
secure and remediate the situation.”

Watch video report and read full article here
Share

Report from the Edge of BC’s Copper Rush

Share

From TheTyee.ca – Jan 13, 2011

By Christopher Pollon

The province’s northwest is slated for a mining boom. A visitor to
those remote parts finds ambition and dread, natural wonders and
billions at stake. Part one of two.

Way up above the headwaters of the Iskut River, in an
alpine meadow bursting with August wildflowers, eight demon-horned rams
appear suddenly.

The two parties — two humans and eight Stone’s sheep — all freeze on the spot, eyes locked. Paul Colangelo, a wildlife photographer hoping for just this luck, drops to the ground, crawling over a ridge and out of sight.

The Stone’s sheep he pursues are the
charismatic mega-fauna of Todagin Mountain in the upper Stikine River
watershed (see map below). Elite hunters
from all over the globe come here every year, about 1,700 kilometres
north of Vancouver, paying upwards of $30,000 for the opportunity to
take down a single ram, a cull considered sustainable in these parts
because the sheep are more abundant here than anywhere else.

They are equally numerous directly to the
northeast, which also happens to be the site of Imperial Metal
Corporation’s ongoing summer drill program at its proposed Red Chris
open pit copper/gold mine. The company has five drilling teams working
all out, and word in the valley is they are finding more gold the deeper
they drill; but as with everything I hear about mining ventures this
summer spent exploring B.C.’s northwest, it’s hard to separate fact from
cash-lubricated fiction.

While Colangelo chases sheep, I climb to
the summit to scan the valley below (see video, below): three
cigar-shaped, impossibly-blue lakes connected by the braided, meandering
Iskut seem to encompass the entire valley bottom. Skirting their edge
is the single-track Stewart Cassiar Highway; out of sight to the east,
not far from where I stand, are the collective headwaters of the Nass,
Stikine and Skeena rivers.

I’m returning to this area after a year’s
absence, during which time the optimism has returned to the northwest
mining and exploration community, thanks to a massive provincial and
federal infrastructure subsidy that will see
the electrical grid extended into this remote corner of B.C. Cheap
grid power promises to make economical many of the low-grade copper
deposits that have been known about for many decades, but “sterilized”
due to remote geography.

Read full article

Share

The Industrialization of British Columbia

Share

From TideChange.ca – Dec. 11, 2010

by Ray Grigg

To many British Columbians, “Super, Natural British Columbia” was a reassuring slogan. At least it tacitly recognized the incredible beauty and the astounding ecological diversity of BC – one of the most biologically diverse regions on the planet. Implicit in this marketing slogan was the promise that BC’s remarkable scenery and richness would be acknowledged as an invaluable and irreplaceable public asset.

So the shift in marketing to “The Best Place On Earth” should have been noted with foreboding, primarily because the expression is too vague to mean anything in particular. Is it “The Best Place On Earth” to gamble? To ship illegal immigrants? To get rich by unregulated speculation? To export raw logs? To operate polluting mines? To drill for methane and gas? To build pipelines? To open new tanker routes for shipping oil to Asia?

The emphasis during the last decade in British Columbia has shifted away from “Super, Natural” toward industrialization. The change has never been official, never publicly declared or explicitly decided by plebiscite or election. But governance of the province has abetted this shift with the relaxation of regulations, with the weakening of oversight, and with environmental assessments becoming little more than ritualistic exercises invariably favouring industrial development over conservation and precautionary measures. The shift has been gradual and pervasive. But not so subtle for the few British Columbians who have noted the signs. Many more, however, are now aware of the loosened rules, the auctioned resources, the changed landscapes, and the exploited places in which everything natural seems to be for sale.

Read full article here

Share

Panel Discussion on Goldcorp’s Donation to SFU

Share

Students, faculty, artists and activists debate the merits of funding education through the profits of the extractive industries

On Wednesday, Nov 24, over 200 people from the Downtown Eastside (DTES)
and the Simon Fraser University (SFU) communities, gathered at SFU’s
Woodward’s campus for a panel discussion on Goldcorp’s $10 million
donation to SFU, which helped complete the construction of the
Woodward’s campus.

The donation has raised concerns among groups working on a wide
variety of issues, including, but not limited to, Canadian mining
abuses, academic freedom, gentrification of the DTES, and the erosion of
public education. In response to this donation, which among other
things meant a renaming of the centre which houses the School of
Contemporary Arts at SFU, a group of students, faculty and activists
came together to form a group called SFU Against Goldcorp and Gentrification – SAGG which formulated four demands to address the many facets of this issue.

The event on Nov 24 was called Framing Cultural Capital
and was organized by the Visual Arts Student Union at SFU: it was an
attempt at addressing some of the concerns mentioned above through
dialogue. The panel was moderated by Jeff Derksen from the Department of
English at SFU and it consisted of Ian Angus (Department of Humanities,
SFU), Alexandra Henao (SFU Against Goldcorp and Gentrification), Cecily
Nicholson (Downtown Eastside Women’s Centre), Irwin Oostindie (W2
Community Media Arts) and Jayce Salloum (Vancouver-based visual artist).

Read the full Vancouver Media Co-op article here


Share

Taseko Mines: B.C. Securities Commission Reviewing Unusual Trading Activity

Share

The
Conservative government brushed off allegations that there may have
been a leak from the federal government on the pending denial of a
Taseko Mines Ltd. project, prompting unusual share trading activity
during a mid-October session.

John Baird, the government House
leader, said his Liberal opponents — who alleged in the House of
Commons that “Conservative insiders” leaked information that may have
benefited certain shareholders — are engaging in “pure speculation.”

Unusual
trading in Taseko occurred in mid-October. On Nov. 2, the federal
Minister of Environment said Taseko’s Prosperity mine project could not
be granted authorizations to proceed.

Baird said before the
federal decision, there was a “publicly available” environmental
assessment on the Prosperity project that recommended Ottawa reject its
development “because it would cause irreparable harm” to the
environment.

The proposed Taseko operation — dubbed the
Prosperity Mine — was planned for a wilderness area about 120
kilometres southwest of Prince George in B.C.’s northern interior.
Promoters touted it as one of the world’s largest gold and copper
plays.

Baird declined to answer Liberal questions about whether
the government was conducting its own internal investigation into the
possibility of a leak, and if the RCMP had been called in to assist in
the probe.

Initial media reports indicated that the unusual trading activity coincided with a cabinet meeting held on Oct. 14.

Read full Vancouver Sun story here

Share

Scientist Finds High Arsenic Levels from Quinsam Coal Mine

Share

Arsenic levels in the Quinsam River watershed are increasing because
of the Quinsam Coal Mine, says the UBC scientist studying the issue,
and to suggest otherwise – as the company has done – is a “gross
distortion” of the facts.

Dr. William Cullen presented his
updated Quinsam watershed study to city council Tuesday night. The
“disturbing findings” show arsenic levels increasing in Long Lake
sediments below the mine. Arsenic sediments are more toxic to organisms
than normal. Arsenic is increasingly available to organisms as far
away as the lower Quinsam River.

Cullen said study data shows sulphates and arsenic are clearly coming from the mine, and coming at an increasing rate.

Company officials say there’s no connection between mining the arsenic. Cullen scoffed at that Tuesday.

Read full Courier-Islander article here 

Share

BHP’s Potash Hostile Take-Over Bid Rejected For Now

Share

The
federal government has rejected BHP Billiton’s $40-billion hostile
takeover bid for Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, but appears to have
left the door open to further talks.  Industry Minister Tony Clement said Wednesday that Canada wants to
attract investment and business, but “some decisions can only be made
once … and there’s no turning back, ever.” Read more of CBC article here

Share

Prosperity Mine Rejection Highlights Flawed BC Environmental Assessment

Share

Everyone
agreed that if the Prosperity gold-copper mine project went ahead in
the Chilcotin, fish would die and habitat would be lost. The question
was: should the mine go ahead regardless?  A B.C. environmental
review concluded it should, while a federal review concluded it
shouldn’t: dramatically different outcomes that are generating criticism
of the way the province approves major projects. Read more of Vancouver Sun article here

Share
Fish Lake (Teztan Biny), saved - for now - from a proposed mine

What a Week for BC’s Environment!

Share

Before I get into listing off several significant recent successes for the growing
legions battling to save our precious environment and farmland in BC, I want to provide a disclaimer – right up front – because I believe it is essential to this
discussion:

There is no such thing as an absolute “victory” in environmental campaigning –
especially these days. Such is the rapacious appetite for our resources from
corporations both near and far that we make a serious mistake ever planting the
flag, declaring victory, packing up and going home. If you count yourself as a
serious member of the fight for our environment and public resources, then you must
acknowledge that defending these values is a way of life – a state of mind – and
commit yourself to it for the long haul. Corporations have no “off switch” –
especially when billions are at stake.

That said, sometimes it is important to pause ever so briefly to acknowledge the
dedication and sacrifices that yield those elusive environmental “victories” (in the
temporary sense, as noted). I am rather fond of champagne, and permit myself more
occasions to enjoy it than just the annual rendition of “Auld Lang Syne.” If you
agree – or have some other preferred method of celebration – then I suggest right
now is as good a moment as any to indulge.

Why, you ask?

Two lengthy and hard-fought campaigns have recently produced laudable “wins” that
deserve recognition and rejoicing: The first is for the protection of Fish Lake, in
the Tsilqot’in territory west of Williams Lake, from the proposed Prosperity Gold
and Copper Mine; the second is for several important pieces of farmland in the Lower
Mainland, threatened by commercial development and highway construction respectively
(more on those in a moment).

As for Fish Lake, months of tense speculation – awaiting the Federal Environment
Minster’s official decision following an Environmental Assessment Federal Review
Panel that recommended against the proposal – were put to an end this week, as the
ministry issued the following statement:

The Government of Canada today announced decisions on two gold-copper mine project
proposals in British Columbia. The proposal for the Mount Milligan mine, near
Prince George, has been granted federal authorizations to proceed. However, the
Prosperity mine project as proposed, near Williams Lake, cannot be granted federal
authorizations to proceed due to concerns about the significant adverse
environmental effects of the project.
(emphasis mine)

“The Government has considered both projects carefully, particularly their
environmental impacts,” said Environment Minister, Jim Prentice. “We believe in
balancing resource stewardship with economic development. The Mount Milligan
project has been designed in a way that minimizes impacts to the environment, while
the significant adverse environmental effects of the Prosperity project cannot be
justified as it is currently proposed.”…

…In making its decision, the Government of Canada took into consideration the
conclusions of the report of the Federal Review Panel, and agreed with the Panel’s
conclusions about the environmental impacts of the project.

Re: my earlier disclaimer, pay careful attention here to the words “as proposed”
which leave the door open to a redesign and re-submission of this proposal at a
later date. Which is why anyone who cares about this lake, home to 85,000 rainbow
trout, and the people and critters who depend on it, would be foolish to declare
victory and call it a day. This project is worth something on the order of $20
Billion, which is a lot of reasons for the proponent, Taseko Mines, not to give up
easily – and for us to remain on guard.

And yet, the significance of this “win” should not be underestimated. Chief Marilyn
Baptiste of the Xeni Gwet’in First Nation, in whose traditional territory Fish Lake
(or Teztan Biny) is located, should be congratulated for her courageous stance,
which included
some very bold words
to both the federal government and project proponent as to how far
she and her people were prepared to go to stop this insane project. And, for the
time being, it seems to have paid off.

This decision from the ministry also sets an important precedent, as it well knows –
which likely contributed to the several month delay on its decision. You see, Fish
Lake was only one of some 20 viable fish-bearing lakes across the country that have
been earmarked for wanton destruction by mining operations, all to save these
companies the expense of building their own tailing ponds and impoundment lots. In
this case, the plan was to drain the lake, convert it into a rock impoundment area,
mine beneath it and around it for gold and copper – and create a new man-made lake,
with the Orwellian moniker of “Prosperity Lake”, to replace it. At a time when the
very same Ministry of Environment acknowledges that less than half of our fresh
water in Canada is of “fair to good quality”, this sort of proposal can only be
properly termed insane. Thus, getting the government to implicitly recognize this
fact is important not just for Fish Lake, but for all of Canada.

So it is for these reasons that we should all take a moment to salute the monumental
achievement of Chief Baptiste, her people, and all the environmentally-minded
citizens around BC and across Canada who banded together in support to help make
this historic decision a reality.

Just as our federal environment ministry warns of our diminishing water quality, so
does our provincial Ministry of Agriculture and Lands warn of our increasingly
imperilled food security. We in BC only produce 48% of our total food locally, and
just 43% of our vegetables, down from 86% in 1970!
The ministry tells us we need to
add over 200,000 acres of arable farmland in the Fraser Valley just to be able to
feed ourselves into the future, which is why destroying any of our existing agricultural land – some of the best in the world – for highways, residences, or industry, is
also simply insane.

To this end, we can thank the tireless farmland defenders in the Lower Mainland who
went to bat for and recently secured the protection of two important pieces of
agricultural land in the region – Maple Ridge’s 200-acre Pelton Estate Farm from
proposed commercial development; and the historic Hudson’s Bay Farm in Langley from highway paving. In both cases, citizens persuaded the Agricultural Land Commission
to reject applications to remove these pieces of land from the protection of the
ALR; in the case of the Hudson’s Bay Farm it was the first time the ALC has rejected
a proposal for highway building under the Campbell regime.

This from the Farmland Defence League’s Donna Passmore on these two historic
achievements:

Both proposals were hard fought by farmland & food security advocates across the
province. On the Pelton Estates issue, Diana Williams, Chair of the Pitt Polder
Preservation Society and her team deserve to take a few deep bows. Thanks, also
to Maple Ridge-Pitt Meadows MLA Michael Sather, novelist Annette Lebox, Matt Laity,
as well as Councillors Candace Gordon and Craig Speirs.

The hard fight to protect Langley’s historic Hudson’s Bay Farm was waged by the
Mufford, Davis & Smith families, all of whom have been working that land for more
than 100 years. Doug McFee, Sonya Paterson, Dean Holcombe, Jacob DeRaadt, Allan
Robinson, Bays Blackhall, federal deputy Green Leader Adriane Carr, Heather
Pritchard (Farm Folk/City Folk), Lynn Perrin (Abbotsford Director, Farmland
Defence League of BC), Cathleen Vecchiato (Langley Co-Chair, Farmland Defence
League of BC), federal Langley NDP Candidate Piotr Majkowski, Judi Tyabji, and
literally hundreds of other people. Special recognition goes to Langley Township
Mayor Rick Green, who fought hard to protect this land and ensure that the people
of Langley had a say in the matters. And special thanks to BC NDP Agriculture
Critic Lana Popham, who threw her support behind the families living and working on
Hudson’s Bay Farm.

Two other noteworthy recent developments – not in the “victory” category (even of
the temporary variety), but significant nonetheless:

1. Last week the Cohen Commission on disappearing Fraser River sockeye – under
pressure from the conservationist coalition presenting to the Inquiry – ordered BC’s
salmon farming industry to disclose more of the disease data they’ve been hiding.
It’s only 21 farms out of 120 total tenures, but there may be more to follow. To the
salmon farmers: If there’s nothing wrong with your operations and you have nothing
to hide, then release it ALL, voluntarily! Otherwise, follow the example of your corporate masters in Oslo and quit pretending everything’s hunky-dory (the global CEOs of the two biggest Norwegian fish farm operators in Canada long ago admitted their farms cause problems for wild fish).

2. Under intense pressure at public hearings last week, Delta Council refrained from
rezoning a controversial 500-acre piece of farmland, known as the Southlands, to
allow for proposed residential development. Much more work needs to be done here to
get that farmland permanently protected and back to producing food for the region
like it once did, but the community’s unwavering defence of the land is heartening
to say the least.

So, pour yourselves a glass of scotch, bubbly, fruit juice, whatever you fancy, take
a moment away from your tireless work protecting our environment – and pat
yourselves and your colleagues on the back for the sacrifices you all make, and for
those rare moments, such as we saw this past week, when they produce a glimmer of
hope amid the bad news with which we’re so often inundated…

Then get back at it – there’s much work to be done!

Share