Tag Archives: fracking

Sun Op-ed: Plans for 3 LNG Plants on BC Coast Undercut Province’s Climate Goals

Share

Read this op-ed in the Vancouver Sun by SFU assistant professor John Axsen on the carbon emissions implications of the Clark Government’s support for three new major LNG plants.

“Premier Clark plans to construct three massive liquefied natural gas
(LNG) plants in Northern B.C. This won’t only create jobs. Extracting
shale gas and operating these plants will release enough global warming
gases to undo B.C.’s other efforts to cut emissions. Clark claims these
plants are in the best interest of B.C.’s families.

However, the
effects of climate change will deliver hardship to B.C. families in
coming decades. The National Round Table on the Environment and the
Economy concludes that climate change will inflict billions of dollars
in economic losses on B.C. residents each year.” (

Read article: http://www.vancouversun.com/opinion/op-ed/government+plan+construct+three+plants+counters+reduction+efforts/5704881/story.html

Share

New Report from Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives: Fracking Up Our Water, Hydro Power and Climate

Share

Read this vital new report from Ben Parfitt and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives on the impacts of fracking technology and resource development in BC.

“A new study concludes that BC’s ballooning shale gas industry is the
natural gas equivalent of Alberta’s tar sands, placing the province’s
water and hydro resource at risk as well as jeopardizing climate change
policies.

Despite industry and government assertions that natural gas from
shale rock is a ‘green’ alternative to other fossil fuels, the study
released today by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and
Wilderness Committee finds the opposite, and lays much of the blame on
the controversial gas extraction technology known as hydraulic
fracturing, or ‘fracking.'” (Nov. 9, 2011)

Read report: http://www.policyalternatives.ca/fracking

Share
Talisman's water pipe from the Williston Reservoir - under construction this past October

Energy Minister Lied About Consulting Public on Frack Water Pipeline

Share

Did BC Energy Minister Rich Coleman outright lie in the Legislature when he promised public consultation for a massive new pipeline to draw billions of litres of water from BC’s biggest hydroelectric dam, the Williston Reservoir, to supply the natural gas industry? A new documentary from Global TV leaves little doubt he did just that.

This past weekend, Global TV’s national investigative journal, 16×9, aired a 16 min story titled “Untested Science”, on the exploding natural gas hydraulic fracturing (or “fracking”) industry in Northeast BC and Alberta. I assisted with the film, contributing a significant amount of footage from a forthcoming feature documentary project I’m working on with another Vancouver filmmaker, Fiona Rayher.

For me, the most poignant aspect of the must-see story was its coverage of the enormous use and contamination of fresh water for these fracking operations, which blast a mixture of high-pressure water, sand and toxic chemicals deep underground to crack open shale formations, thus releasing gases trapped within. The practice has become highly controversial everywhere it’s practiced around the world – generating a ban in France and moratoria in places like Quebec and parts of the Northeast United States. Meanwhile, BC, a global hotbed for the industry, has largely escaped public and regulatory scrutiny – but that’s starting to change, as this 16×9 documentary demonstrates.

The story clearly shows Minister Coleman, responding in the Legislature this past June to a question from Independent MLA Bob Simpson – who, along with fellow Independent MLA Vicki Huntington, has worked hard to put fracking under the microscope in Victoria – regarding the then-proposed water pipeline by fracking giant Talisman Energy and Canbriam Energy into the Williston Reservoir.

Mr. Simpson asked whether the proposal by Talisman Energy and Cambrian Energy to remove 7.3 Billion litres of water a year from behind the dam has in fact already been approved, without public consultation. Here’s how Coleman replied:

“There will be an extensive process of public consultation, discussion and negotiations with First Nations before anything would go ahead.”

Two months later, the companies got their approval – in the form of 20 year water extraction licenses from the BC Government – absent any public consultation. The highlight of Global’s program is the bumbling response of Coleman to their questions about why he lied in the Legislature when he promised “an extensive process of public consultation.” Here’s part of Coleman’s feeble answer: “…And that could have been a mistake in language by me…I mean, basically what I was trying to say is that we would do government process with regards to water licenses.”

By the time I was up in the Peace Valley in early October, the construction was already well underway, proceeding at a furious pace. I counted 3 different coupling machines at work, fusing together 50-60 foot lengths of black polyethylene pipe, approximately 10-12 inches in width – for two side-by-side pipelines.

A worker there described the process to me. The machine heats up one end of each pipe, then presses them together until they bond. Each machine can fuse a new length of pipe every half hour or so. With at least three machines running, the construction of the 37 mile pipeline from the edge of the reservoir to the companies’ nearby fracking leases was progressing rapidly.

I drove out to the end of the line, where the twin pipes will eventually plunge into the reservoir and begin hoovering out 10 million litres of water every day – mind you, before it gets turned into electricity for British Columbians by passing through the dam’s turbines (it’s of course also permanently removed from the Peace River’s downstream ecologies). While filming the work underway there, a silver truck from Talisman barreled up to me. The driver rolled down his window and began barking questions at me; as soon as he ascertained I didn’t work for the company he told me to “Take my pictures and fuck off.” He claimed it was private property, to which I replied that we’d have to agree to disagree on that point – in perfectly well-mannered, expletive-free speech (okay, maybe not quite). I finished my filming at a deliberately leisurely pace, packed up and left.

What I didn’t get into with this fellow from Talisman was the fact that my family’s ranch, Goldbar at 20 Mile, sits beneath that there reservoir. It was flooded years ago to provide the people of BC with affordable electricity – not for the fracking industry to get its water. And therein lies the problem with this whole scenario – or one of them, anyway.

British Columbians are being told by Coleman and his government that we need to flood yet another section of the Peace River Valley for Site C Dam; and yet all of the power from that dam is destined not for BC households and small businesses, but to power the fracking industry and up to six new mines in the region (BC’s electrical demands are on a steep decline, to the point we’re currently abundantly self-sufficient in electricity).

Meanwhile, we’re sucking unmade electricity – in the form of water – from an existing hydroelectric reservoir, to provide another vital resource for fracking. And all this electricity and water go to industry at a fraction of what it’s worth. We’re currently selling power to big industry for about half what you and I pay on our residential bills – and that gap is only set to widen.

So here is the question facing British Columbians, when it comes to the fracking industry and the matter of Site C Dam:

Do you support subsidizing the oil and gas and coal industries with endless amounts of fresh water – including taking it from our public hydroelectric dam – plus building a $10 Billion new dam, to be paid for by your tax dollars and much increased power bills, all so these industries can get their power for half to a third what you pay for it?

That’s the deal Energy Minster Rich Coleman and Premier Christy Clark would have you do. Just don’t expect them to ask you this question. They’ve made their position on public consultation abundantly clear.

Share

China Getting into Shale Gas

Share

Read this interesting story from Scientific American  on China’s foray – with US assistance – into shale gas (while we consider building up to 7 extremely costly and energy-intensive LNG plants in BC to ship shale gas to China).

“Shale gas is among the largest onshore energy prospects in China, and
it is treated as such in Beijing and by local officials in central
China and its sprawling Northwest. Unlocking trillions of cubic feet of
gas buried in underground formations means heating more city apartments,
generating more electricity from a resource other than coal, and
feeding industrial plants hungry for energy.

But the government’s quest to develop China’s large shale gas
deposits is in its earliest days. National oil companies and Beijing are
moving cautiously. China is well aware of the environmental pitfalls
that are raising doubts in the United States. There are geological
differences that make the U.S. shale boom difficult to duplicate in
China. Water
for extracting gas is relatively abundant in Sichuan, but farmers in
the nation’s breadbasket need it more. Sichuan farms supply 7 percent of
China’s rice, wheat and other grains.” (Oct. 14, 2011)

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=china-begins-tap-shale-gas-american-help

Share

Enbridge Buys Encana’s stake in the Massvie Horn River Cabin Gas Plant

Share

Read this report from trade publication Alberta Oil on Enbridge’s purchase of a majority stake in the Cabin Gas Plant, northeast of Fort Nelson – indicating the company’s interest in BC shale gas.

“Lots of horse trading going on in northeastern British Columbia this
week. Calgary-based Enbridge Inc. announced today that it has reached an agreement
with Encana Corp. to acquire majority ownership in a gas plant 60
kilometers northeast of Fort Nelson in B.C.’s remote Horn River basin.
Enbridge will acquire a 57 per cent share in the project’s first two
phases, which together could process 800 million cubic feet of natural
gas per day.

The deal fits with a desire by Encana to offload anywhere from $1- to
$2-billion in non-core assets this year. For Enbridge, the acquisition
comes one day after company chief executive Pat Daniel told Reuters that
his firm is interested in taking part in one of several proposals on the books to ship liquefied natural gas from the coast to markets in the Pacific Rim.” (Oct. 7, 2011)

http://www.albertaoilmagazine.com/2011/10/another-suitor-emerges-for-kitimat-lng/

Share

BC Oil and Gas Commission Investigating Link Between Fracking and Earthquakes

Share

Read this story from the Calgary Herald on the Oil and Gas Commission’s investigation into whether or not natural gas hydraulic fracturing operations are causing earthquakes in Northeast BC.

“Since 2009, there have been 31 earthquakes in the Horn River Basin,
an active natural gas extraction area. Before 2009, the area had not
experienced any recorded earthquake activity, said Friedrich. The
earthquakes ranged in size from 2.5 to 3.5 on the Richter scale, which
typically means they can be felt but rarely cause damage. Three of the earthquakes took place as hydraulic fracturing was underway, said Friedrich.” (Sept 30, 2011)

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Controversial+fracking+linked+earthquakes/5481341/story.html

Share

CBC: Shale Gas Making BC Residents Sick

Share

See this story – with photos and audio – from CBC.ca on claims by several farmers near Dawson Creek that nearby natural gas hydraulic fracturing operations are making them sick.

“Wilma Avery says her lungs were damaged when one company flared its
wells and gas plant below her house during a weather inversion in March. ‘My doctor came and looked at me and said, “I think you’ve breathed
some noxious fumes.” I said, “I think I did, too,”‘ Avery said. ‘It’s a yellow pall that was completely around me. I had a cough that
lasted — to put it crudely, you lose all control of everything. Most of
the time I just sat on the toilet and coughed. All I’m asking is this
should never happen again, because the next time it’ll probably kill
me.'”

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/09/28/bc-shale-gas-sick-farmers.html

Share

Clark’s Answer to Deepening Debt: Pretend Shipping Tar Sands to China Means “Jobs” for BC

Share

Christy Clark, aka Premier Photo-Op, has a big mess on her hands – but, fear not, she’ll let us all muck about in it.
 
The government is in deepening debt and Ms. Clark can’t pretend that it’s a mystery how that came about. While there are many causes the principal one is that the government didn’t see the Recession coming and, when it came, went into denial. The budget of 2009 with which they proudly went to the polls was an utter and deliberate sham. Ditto the HST.
 
How is Clark going to deal with this?
 
Easy – Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
 
And where will those jobs come from?
 
In part from exports to China. Apparently Premier Clark hasn’t heard that China has its own Recession going, Big Time. Their banking system is essentially the government and only looks good on paper because the US owes them so much. Their mega-projects, especially the Three Gorges Dam, have become serious fiscal problems.
 
What is truly worrying is that Ms. Clark will try to create employment, preparatory to election time, on her own mega-projects such as the proposed Enbridge pipeline to Kitimat and the related tanker traffic down our treacherous coast. Environmental rules, such as they are, will become a chimera – a cynical gesture of contempt to citizens who put protection of our environment ahead of Ms. Clark’s election prospects. Fracking, the natural gas extraction which pollutes huge amounts of water, will be hugely encouraged.
 
The entire policy of the Campbell/Clark government will be to have in place a policy which she believes will mesmerize the public into believing that prosperity is just around the corner.
 
If the genie gave me but one wish it would be that everyone understands that pipelines and tanker traffic don’t pose risks but certainties. We must hammer this home as the corporations move into high gear with their high paid flacks to convince the public that they really do care about the environment. The fact is that they couldn’t care less about the environment or any social values. Oil spills are not seen for the ugly destruction they bring but merely the cost of doing business.
 
We environmentalists have to face facts – we haven’t the money to match the outputs of both government and industry. We must get down to basics – the issue is not money or jobs but the preservation of our very soul. We must care for our fish not because we fish but because when we lose them we lose a part of us. When we lose our wilderness we don’t do so just in some sort of abstract way but in the real sense that we, each and every one of us, have sustained a wound that will never go away.
 
There is no “safe” way you can construct and maintain pipelines or transfer oil on tankers. You can’t, in that most weasely of weasel words, “mitigate” the damage. We have to understand that from the moment you start the first pipe installation, the first step on the road to certain environmental devastation has been taken. When the first barrel of oil starts through the pipe, catastrophe has become merely a question of “when”.
 
The arguments we make are never met head-on. The answer will be, “aw hell, you don’t really believe those eco-freaks, do you?” “Jeez, this is the 21st century, sure we can do these things with little or no risk these days”, “Let those goddam tree huggers talk to the guys out of work”. “If you don’t move forward, you’ll end up going backwards”. There are plenty more one-liners.
 
There is no doubt that society must change; our ambitions must take into account a different society. For if we permit the destruction of our environment, what do we have left of the beautiful province we all love so much. The unemployed are not so because of environmentalists but because of a society that finds it easier to destroy than create.

While I do not let religion get in the way of rational debate, surely it’s utterly apropos to remember Jesus’s words, “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

And, folks, it’s our soul that’s at stake here.

Share

Clark, Big Oil Want BC and Alberta’s Raw Resources Open for Business to China

Share

Read this report from the Province on the Business Council of BC’s annual economic forum in Vancouver, where industry leaders and politicians joined arms in calling to make BC’s raw resources open for business with the growing Asian market.’

“‘We need to open up the B.C. gate more fully,’ said Lorraine
Mitchelmore, president and county chair of Shell Canada Ltd. ‘Canada
really needs to diversify its customer base for energy products and
create access to global energy markets. This is a real time of great
opportunity for Canada.’ Lindsay Gordon, president and CEO of HSBC
Bank of Canada, echoed these sentiments, and added that British
Columbians need a ‘wake-up call’ of the importance of Asia to ‘their
future and prosperity.'”

Share

Feds Call for Fracking Reviews re: Environmental Impacts

Share

Read this report from the Ottawa Citizen on the federal Ministry of Environment’s decision to have two seperate reviews conducted into the science and environmental impacts of natural gas hydraulic fracturing.

“The move comes as jurisdictions around the world, including Quebec
and New York state, have halted “fracking” operations or have launched
reviews on the use of the technique to tap shale gas reserves and other
fossil fuels. Environment Minister Peter Kent already has said the
government is monitoring shale gas extraction and has the power to
regulate its development, although it’s mostly an area of provincial and
territorial jurisdiction. He has now asked the Council of
Canadian Academies – a not-for-profit agency that provides science-based
studies – for an independent, expertpanel assessment ‘of the state of
scientific knowledge on potential environmental impacts from the
development of Canada’s shale gas resources.'” (Sept 22, 2011)

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Fracking%2Breview%2Blaunched%2Bfederal%2Bagencies/5439602/story.html#ixzz1YhDJX8Pu

Share