Open Letter to Christy Clark on Enbridge, BC’s Sovereignty


The following letter was originally published on economist and former President and CEO of the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia Robyn Allan’s blog,

April 19, 2012

Dear Premier Clark,

Your government has not spoken out for or against the Northern Gateway pipeline proposed by Enbridge Inc., rather preferring to wait until the National Energy Review Board process is complete.  I am writing to you today to explain that, unfortunately the current Northern Gateway environmental and public interest process is flawed and as a result the public interest of BC is not protected.

The Federal government, as I am sure you are aware, has publicly endorsed the project, stated it is in the national interest of Canada, and has systematically demonized individuals and groups who oppose the project.  This behaviour has made a travesty of the necessary arms length relationship between government and an independent regulatory body.

As long as there was some sense that the Joint Review Panel (JRP) was independent and had the authority to reject the proposal regardless of the political pressure imposed by the Prime Minister’s Office, a semblance of due process was maintained. That necessary condition was violated when Federal Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver unveiled proposed legislation on April 17, 2012.

The Federal Government now intends to further weaken environmental protection and favour large oil companies operating, primarily, in Alberta.  This has betrayed any remaining trust in federal energy decisions as they relate to the province of British Columbia.

With the overhaul of the environmental assessment rules and process, and making final decision on oil pipelines—such as the Enbridge Northern Gateway and proposed Kinder Morgan projects—a Federal cabinet prerogative, there is no confidence that the Government of Canada will make decisions that will be in the best public interest of the residents of this province.

A major change in policy in the midst of nation breaking events such as Northern Gateway or Kinder Morgan requires deliberate action on the part of your Office to protect the public interest trust and rights of BC residents and First Nations.

Certainly when the NEB process for Northern Gateway commenced in June 2010, the BC government thought the JRP would be objective and have the power to recommend a binding decision which would reflect the public interest of British Columbians and Canadians.  I can imagine that the safety and efficiency inherent in one independent review body—which the NEB was believed to be at the time—and the belief that our public interest would be protected were reasons why the Liberal government of BC under the leadership of Gordon Campbell, felt it acceptable to sign away our right to conduct an environmental assessment under B.C.’s Environmental Assessment Act.

During my review of the Enbridge economic documents as part of their Application to the NEB, I wondered why there was no real or meaningful review of their case by various ministries of the BC government.  The deliberate intent in the Enbridge documents to increase the price of oil for Canadian consumers and businesses, and the lack of concern over the impact our petro-currency has on forestry, agriculture, tourism and manufacturing, appeared to be glaring examples of an economic case intent on presenting only the benefits to the oil industry without due consideration to the economic costs for the rest of us.  The development of a strategy to export raw crude to Asia at the cost of value added jobs and control over environmental standards also seemed worthy of provincial comment.

I felt surely, there should be professional economists, paid by taxpayers, that would stand up and present a fair picture of the macroeconomic impact rapid resource expansion and export has on the economy of British Columbia, not to mention the threat to the environment and First Nations rights. That is when I discovered that BC had signed away the right to actively assess the project.  I then understood that not only have you, as Premier, elected to remain silent on the issue, but our provincial departments have effectively been muzzled as well.

I draw to your attention the Environmental Assessment Equivalency Agreement signed between the NEB and BC’s Environmental Assessment Office (EAO) on June 21st, 2010.  I have attached a link to the agreement for your ease of recall.

Essentially the agreement states that the EAO will accept the NEB’s environmental assessment for four proposed projects, including the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, which would otherwise have to be reviewed under BC’s Environmental Assessment Act.  The NEB’s review would be treated as an equivalent assessment.

If the province of BC had not signed away its right to the NEB, under the terms of the legislation the EAO would have had to undertake a review.  According to the EAO, it is a “neutral agency that manages the review of proposed major projects in British Columbia, as required by the Environmental Assessment Act.  The environmental assessment process provides for the thorough, timely and integrated assessment of the potential environmental, economic, social, heritage, and health effects that may occur during the lifecycle of these projects, and provides for meaningful participation by First Nations, proponents, the public, local governments, and provincial agencies.”

We have the power within BC to undertake meaningful environmental assessment within provincial jurisdiction, but signed it away.   However, not all is lost.   Clause 6 of the Environmental Assessment Equivalency Agreement states:  ”Either Party may terminate this Agreement upon giving 30 days written notice to terminate the other Party”. 

May I recommend that the Government of British Columbia inform the Government of Canada that the province is now exercising its right with 30 days notice in order that it may undertake a proper environmental assessment under the terms of the provincial Environmental Assessment Act, for the Enbridge project, and it will not entertain signing such an agreement for the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline.

This action will ensure that the public interest of the people of BC will be protected and will not be severely curtailed by the actions of the Government of Canada favouring primarily Alberta’s oil producers.


Original Signed by Robyn Allan

Robyn Allan

cc.  Dr. Terry Lake, Minister of the Environment

Mr. Adrian Dix, Leader of the Opposition

Mr. Rob Fleming, Environment Critic

Mr. John Cummins, Conservative Leader

Mr. John van Dongen, Conservative MLA

Mr. Bob Simpson, Independent MLA

Ms. Vicki Huntington, Independent MLA


About Damien Gillis

Damien Gillis is a Vancouver-based documentary filmmaker with a focus on environmental and social justice issues - especially relating to water, energy, and saving Canada's wild salmon - working with many environmental organizations in BC and around the world. He is the co-founder, along with Rafe Mair, of The Common Sense Canadian, and a board member of both the BC Environmental Network and the Haig-Brown Institute.

10 thoughts on “Open Letter to Christy Clark on Enbridge, BC’s Sovereignty

  1. Sadly, wishful thinking. The Clark Government should change its name to Neo-Con – it is no more Liberal than a mouse is a cat. It is totally in bed with the harperite government and , like its federal counterpart, has strongly demonstrated that it has absolutely no interest in protecting or conserving the environment for this generation or future ones. It is corporate greed run amok. Soooo,, it will be up to the citizens of BC and Canada to protect our democratic rights, our environment, our long cherished values.

  2. Christy Clark is the last person I would expect to go to bat for BC. Asking her to pull out of the Equivalency Agreement is akin to spitting into the wind.

    The only hope we have of taking control of our own destiny is to forget the BC Liberals and stand up for BC ourselves until such time as we finally get to vote for a new government.

    Hopefully, Harper and Christy won’t be able to do much more damage before May 2013.

  3. I am hoping this marks the turning point.

    British Columbians need to regain control of their destiny.

    From this point on much data will be revealed describing how we found ourselves here and who contributed to bringing us here. Moreover, opportunities like the one Robyn forwards will be put on the table for us to take back the agenda.

    Allan’s suggestion that Christy pull out of the Equivalency Agreement is noble however when it is fully understood to what extent the BC Libs have fostered the ground for this agenda, such a move will be counterintutive.

    Its going to be quite a ride.

  4. Not only are British Columbians being fleeced by the welfare oil barons, but so are Albertans. The various pipeline proposals are for the benefit of mostly American owned companies…but also BP and Shell. We have been fleeced with low corporate taxes (and going lower) and low royalty rates, which have ripped off Albertans to the tune of $52 Billion dollars so far. That money could have paid for a lot of hospitals, doctors, nurses, schools, seniors help, affordable housing and the list goes on and on. Yet we keep electing the “bag men/women” for the oil companies?? Are we nuts, or should we bring back Ernest Mannings’ “Eugenics program” and start with the politicians???

  5. Christy Clak will not speak up for British Columbians because she is not allowed to.

    She has no power over her Harpereon controllers whose only purpose is to extract as much wealth from our resources as they can before we rise up and evict them.

    The small handful of ‘wealthy beyond their ability to spend it in their lifetime’ truly believe that their greedy interests are the best interests for this province.

    The people of this province know they have been fleeced for so long and so often that they are ‘conditioned’ to believe that their only recourse is to rely on the ‘good graces’ of the puppetry that serves for governors.

    The very ones who have sold out body and soul to the interlopers for mere peanuts in comparison to their ‘benefactors’.

    The only solution is revolution, and if we leave it off much longer, there will be nothing left to fight for.

  6. It is my sincerest & fondest hope that the government of British Columbia will see fit to exercise OUR RIGHTS as British Columbians to determine our environmental future!

Comments are closed.