In the news recently was an item about Paul V. Godfrey, C.M., the President of Postmedia, the largest newspaper chain in the country, owning some 15 papers in major centres plus a slew of community papers across the land. M. Godfrey has been admitted to the Canadian News Hall of Fame.
I have one or two questions for Mr. Godfrey, arising out of investigations I’ve been doing in recent months.
Mr. Godfrey, can we agree that Postmedia wholly owns the Vancouver Province, the Vancouver Sun, and the National Post, which circulate in Vancouver?
A question has occurred to me, Mr. Godfrey: Does Postmedia have some sort of deal with the Fraser Institute whereby you give that organization a great deal of coverage on almost every issue that deals with fossil fuels and the environment?
Now, a couple of years ago I would have been scared stiff to ask that question for fear of being sued for the inferences likely to be drawn from it. However, after the stranger deals of yours I have uncovered in the last few months, I realize that you are in no position to get too excited about questions along this line.
Nothing to worry about, says Fraser Institute
What piqued my interest recently was an article in the Vancouver Sun by the Fraser Institute assuring us that we had no need to worry about LNG tankers on our coast. The writer advised that the only major oil spill in the last 20 years was from a Ferry, not a Tanker so relax everybody.
I’ll not devote too much time to this absurd declaration but simply ask why the Fraser Institute doesn’t tell the whole truth and, secondly, avoids examining places where there’s a lot of tanker traffic, unlike BC where there is very little?
The fatal flaw in the Fraser Institute’s presentation comes in a few little words in one paragraph which talks about “The oil spills at sea”. This is similar language to what Woodfibre LNG uses, as does the self-declared expert – from the industry, I might add – Captain Stephen Brown.
The problem with this and similar pious declarations is obvious: Howe Sound, the Fraser River, Saanich Inlet, Strait of Juan de Fuca, Douglas Channel, Hecate Strait and so on are not at sea, or the high seas, in the words of WLNG’s Byng Giraud, and I would direct the learned gentleman to such places as the Bosphorous and the Dardanelles – to name but two places which more replicate what tanker traffic will face on the BC coast. Indeed, if the Fraser Institute would just subscribe to gCaptain (free) and read of regular tanker mishaps all over the worldn they might not spout such tendentious shit.
The question I ask Mr. Godfrey is:
[quote]Does Postmedia or any of its papers have a deal with the Fraser Institute similar to its one with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers? Or the formal partnership with Resource Works, the less than truthful advocate for Woodfibre LNG?[/quote]
Postmedia partnered with LNG lobby
My interest in this matter arose out of the partnership deal between the Vancouver Province and Resource Works. I admit my involvement – I, along with most citizens of the area, am vigorously opposed to WLNG.
When I read Resource Works’ mission statement and saw that the Province was a partner in their nefarious venture, I was horrified. This was so unethical and so contrary to the formal and informal principles that have always guided the newspaper industry that I couldn’t believe what I was reading. I must tell you, Mr. Godfrey, that when my findings were I printed here, the publisher Damien Gillis and I were concerned that it was some sort of strange mistake, even a hoax, and that we’d be sued. We took the chance – nobody else in the media was prepared to – and when no denial came from Postmedia or the Province, we had to assume we had struck paydirt.
In following through on this revelation, I discovered that the National Post, through its publisher, Douglas Kelly, had pledged its troth, in truly loving terms, to the fossil fuel industry!
Being a curious sort of bugger, I followed through and, lo and behold, came across the two agreements between Postmedia and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), certified by documents. The first came by way of a Powerpoint-style presentation pitching Postmedia’s offer to CAPP for a nationwide editorial and ad campaign. The presentation was leaked online, picked up by Greenpeace, then published by The Vancouver Observer last year. The other is a deal between the Financial Post and CAPP – freely available on parent Postmedia’s website.
I have repeatedly made these findings public – or as public as one can when no newspaper will print them – and in the absence of a denial from Postmedia concluded, hard as it was to believe, that these agreements were for real even though they demonstrate that Postmedia are little more than humble shills for the fossil fuel industry.
Bearing in mind that the Sun, Province and National Post, and a dozen other daily papers in Canada, belong to Postmedia and take their marching orders from you, Mr. Godfrey, it must surely be fair to ask: How can you defend managing your papers so as to burnish the image of the fossil fuel industry, of all groups?
This obviously includes avoiding stories which would be harmful to your partners in that filthy industry. When the fix is in, what the media does not report is even more important than what it does.
Special treatment for Fraser Institute
Perhaps there is no deal or nudge, nudge, wink, wink, understanding with the Fraser Institute. If that’s so, the question is obvious: Why do they get so much coverage in your newspapers and why don’t less right-wing think tanks get any, or at best very little? I guess you’d be pretty hypocritical to agree to brown-nose industry no matter how destructive they are and at the same time give equal time to those who care about sentimental things like the environment, the atmosphere and global warming.
Forgive a final question, Mr. Godfrey:
[quote]Considering your lovey dovey relationship with Resource Works and, even worse, with CAPP, and the journalist’s duty to report to the public free of any interest in conflict with that duty, aren’t you just a tad embarrassed at entering The Canadian News Hall of Fame?[/quote]
13 thoughts on “Rafe: How does oil-boosting Postmedia boss get into News Hall of Fame?”
And, I think what shocked me the most about their blind endorsement of Harper, was they were endorsing a PM that willfully and aggressively shunned the media, controlled who could ask him questions and pre screened them, and tried to manipulate them to his message at every turn.
It was hard for me to stomach that a news paper could support someone so opposed to what news papers are supposed to do.
They lost me as a customer.
I understand news papers using their editorial pages to support certain political candidates; it happens all the time and for as long as I have read newspapers.
However, I have subscribed to the Van Sun and Province papers for my entire adult life, and somehow their editorial supporting Harper really made me feel uneasy. I had never, ever, felt that was about a newspaper endorsing a candidate before. It just gave me an awful feeling about what these papers had become.
Their endorsement had no facts to back it up, and blatantly ignored the truths about Harper’s economic and financial management. It was just a dreadful piece.
I did not renew my subscriptions after that. I am not sure if I will go back to them anytime soon.
Thank you for shining a light on what is becoming of Canada’s news media.
Good for you Rafe!
The freedom of the press belongs to those who own the press.
Well done, Rafe. Well done, Damien.
Be careful crossing the street, don’t go out alone, and check the peek-hole before you open the door. These arstles play dirty. Very dirty.
Rafe, you’re one of a kind – and thank God for it! The mainstream media IS the 1%.
And let’s not forget that old chestnut attributed to Randolph Hearst: “If you want a free press, go out and buy yourself a newspaper!”
The old adage ‘never believe anything until it’s been officially denied’ comes to mind. In the case of Postmedia, that morphs into ‘never believe anything until Postmedia has declined to publish it’.
Apparently the Canadian News Hall of Fame has just become the Canadian News Hall of Shame.
After all, the same question could be asked of them;
Aren’t you folks the least bit embarrassed with the inclusion to membership of such an obviously biased advocate for the gas and oil industry?
Has anyone investigated whether there is an agreement between CAPP and the Canadian News Hall of Fame? Just asking.
Comments are closed.