China has declared war on coal and coal consumption is down as a result. But this coal war offers some good news, some not so good news for Canada, and some bad news, all at the same time.
China turns to clean tech, fracking
The good news pertains to: 1) China having become an unparalleled leader and investor in the global migration to a the green economy; and 2) China’s ongoing adoption of ambitious new policies and targets to accelerate this migration at a spellbinding rate.
Unfortunately, the aforementioned good news for China also has serious implications for Canada in that not only is Canada falling further and further behind China regarding the green economy, but Trudeau and Harper, via FIPA, are set on selling Canada’s resources to China while opening the doors for China to dump its clean technologies in Canada.
The bad news is that China’s war on coal has also given rise to ambitious, but environmentally reckless, development of shale gas, wrongly perceived to be a cleaner, or less environmentally harmful, alternative to coal.
The good news
I highlighted the incredible pace of China’s initiatives to go green in an article last year, China’s Chaotic Leap Forword to a Green Economy.
In a nutshell:
- China has become world’s the largest investor in clean energy technologies, with $61.3B spent on renewable energy technologies in 2013 that resulted in 28 gigawatts (GW) of solar and wind capacity added in that year alone
- It has awesome green job numbers, like 300,000 jobs in its solar PV sector and 800,000 jobs in the solar thermal sector
- It has evolved from a domestic solar manufacturing sector that served 1% of global markets in 2004 to 50% by 2012
- It has a plan for 7 pilots on cap and trade
- Finally, China has laid the policy ground work for world leadership in the manufacturing and deployment of electric vehicles.
As result of these measures, the above-mentioned October 2013 Common Sense Canadian article projected that coal consumption in China would peak in 2015.
Coal use falling
But China is going green so quickly that projections about its energy future tend to prove too conservative. As a case in point, for the first time in this century, coal consumption and coal imports in China are down.
The prediction is that this trend will continue, translating into a 15% reduction in coal imports, to less than 300M metric tonnes imported by the end of 2014. Moreover, evidence that this trend is long-term comes from the Beijing government’s announcement that it will ban coal use in 6 city districts by 2020 replace it with clean energy.
Also worth noting, China’s war on coal includes the banning of sales and imports of coal containing high quantities of ash and sulfur. The new regulation bans for sale and import coal with more than 40% ash content and 3% sulfur . This ban would effectively eliminate low heating value coal from Indonesia and coal with arsenic from Australia.
Yet, notwithstanding the extraordinary progress China has made in such a short period, it is currently working on policies that will further accelerate its migration to a green economy.
China’s next leap forward
On that note, rumours abound as to what to expect from China’s five year plan for 2015-20. This includes the possibility of China introducing a cap and trade system in 2016. China already has a pilot cap and trade system in Shenzhen, the first of seven pilots in the country.
Meanwhile, China is well-positioned to lead the world in electric vehicles (ev’s), not only now, but in the years to come. In particular:
- China’s BYD is already manufacturing electric buses
- China’s central government has set an objective for 30% of its vehicle purchases to be electric vehicles beginning 2016
- A $16B program is under review to set up charging stations across the country
- Electric and hybrid Made-in-China vehicles are now exempt from a 10% purchase tax.
- As well, several regional governments are targeting for 30% of their vehicle purchases to be hybrid and electric vehicles by 2016.
Not-so-good-news for Canada
What does China’s exceptional progress and policy leadership mean for Canada, in the context of China having become the world’s largest energy consumer and, consequently, a major influence in global energy paradigms? In crude terms, Canada will have an enormous green economy gap to close, beginning in 2015, after the upcoming federal election.
It also means that Canada will have to shed the mindset that says our future economic wellbeing lies with increasing exports of fossil fuels – a mindset shared by both Harper and Trudeau.
FIPA, the Canada-China trade agreement recently ratified by the Harper administration, will only compound these problems.
That is, the US and the EU have responded to China’s highly-subsidized dumping of clean tech on global markets with the imposition of steep tariffs. But FIPA stipulates that there will be no commercial barriers associated with environmental technologies. This stipulation could seriously handicap the development of Canada’s clean tech sectors.
In short, a successful Canadian plan for a migration to a green economy must take into account China. To do otherwise would be at Canada’s peril.
China gets fracking
In collaboration with US partners, China is setting the stage to develop what may be the largest shale gas resources in the world, 1.7 times the potential of the US. With fewer than 200 wells drilled to date, China is projected to produce 1058 billion cubic feet of natural gas annually by 2020. And the environmental implications identified thus far of China’s pending shale gas boom are enormous.
First, fracking regulations in China are almost non-existent. Second fracking in China requires twice as much water than US shale gas operations because China’s gas lies deeper underground and in more complex geological formations.
This in a country with dangerously low water per capita and where land twice the size of New York City turns into desert every year.
This, in a country where fracking waste water often goes untreated.
Nevertheless, all is in place to speed up the tempo of shale gas development. Already, foreign multinationals are investing heavily in China while companies like the state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) – the same company that bought out Nexen in Alberta – have spent $8.7B buying shares in US shale gas operations. One can suspect that this will offer Chinese firms opportunities to obtain patents on technologies; ultimately manufacture these technologies in China; and then export these very same technologies to the US at a cheaper price.
All this is going on while the US experience has taught us that that methane leaks associated from shale gas development are grossly underestimated and the potential for regulations to control these emissions are overestimated. Drilling creates fractures in surrounding rock that cement cannot completely fill, thus opening paths for the escaping of gases and liquids. Furthermore, as the cement ages, it pulls away from the surrounding rock, reducing the tightness of the seals, thereby generating greater danger for methane leaks and water and air pollution.
Will history repeat itself?
The good and bad news have been presented in this article to demonstrate the incredible ability for China to head in opposite directions – at a tremendous speed.
On one hand, China’s amazingly rapid migration to a green economy, accompanied by a reduction coal use, suggests that China will be a major vector in the global replacement of fossil fuels with clean technologies alternatives.
On the other hand, its fracking activities, while nowhere near the scale of what is happening on China’s clean technology side of the equation, raises the weakness for which China is so famous – first go full speed ahead, wait for the problems to accumulate and then engage with incredible zeal in gestures to solve the problems created by their previous mistakes.
6 thoughts on “China’s war on coal means lots more renewable energy…and fracking”
An interesting and in some respects a worrisome article. As a biologist, with over 60 years of varied biological experience, I am becoming more and more concerned about where all of our demographic growth, resource exploitation, and alteration of the environment are taking us and the world around us. The loss of other species and ecological communities continues almost as a given in the name of human ‘progress’.
One might wonder.whether or not we are at some kind of ecological ‘break-point, at which humans should strive to reduce their uncontrolled population growth, and their domination and wholesale exploitation of the planet. Oh boy, I can imagine the howling at such thinking.
If we cannot move into the future wisely, I suspect that the environment will, one way or another, sort it for us.
Comments are closed.