Category Archives: WATER

Maude Barlow on Fish Lake and Protecting Canada’s Water

Share

Canadian water warrior and international environmental powerhouse Maude Barlow spoke
recently to a crowd of several hundred in Vancouver on the plan to turn Fish Lake
and possibly 20 other lakes across Canada into toxic dumps for mines. The National
Chair of the Council of Canadians and former Senior Advisor on Water to the United
Nations was joined by Chief Marilyn Baptiste of the Xeni Gwet’in First Nation – in
whose traditional Tsilqot’in territory Fish Lake lies – and Greenpeace co-founder
Rex Weyler for the insightful talk. Maude and her co-presenters discussed the Fish
Lake proposal, the Harper policy known as Schedule 2 – designed to water down the
Fisheries Act to allow mines to use lakes for tailing ponds – and the critical state
of water in Canada and around the world. A must-see for anyone who cares about
protecting our water. Eight minutes.

Share

Site C is a cataclysmic mistake

Share

Site C is a cataclysmic mistake not only in view of our need for farmland in the coming convergence of climate change and peak oil in the next 10 to 30 years. It is wasteful in every other way—for the usual political reasons of corporate profit.

Energy efficiency is the first solution to our energy needs. Worldwide, we waste more than half of the electricity we generate (details at Rocky Mountain Institute: rmi.com.) A study carried out by a coalition of community organizations in co-operation with BC Hydro in the late 80’s found a conservative estimate of 44% wasted in BC. The thousands of residential and commercial construction projects alone, if built to energy efficiency standards, would save untold amounts of future demand. Converting residential, commercial and industrial operations, including BC Hydro, to energy efficiency will create thousands of new jobs, businesses, and industries, and stimulate a sustainable economy.

Continue reading Site C is a cataclysmic mistake

Share
Rafe Mair

Rage and Sorrow Over Government Lies and Lost Legacy

Share

Last Friday Gwen
Barlee of the Wilderness Committee and I, on behalf of The
Common
Sense Canadian,

addressed a group of young – at least they look young to me! –
teachers at an ESL college. We were invited because they were hearing
more and more about the BC government’s Energy Policy and they
didn’t like what they were hearing and wanted more information.

On my way home
I started to wonder where my mind was going because I felt a curious
feeling – deep rage combined with every bit as strong a feeling of
sadness. Had I become overwhelmed by the enormity of the ongoing
blatant lie which is the Gordon Campbell dictatorship? Was I getting
like that person we all know, obsessed with something – perhaps a
marriage breakup, maybe a lawsuit – to the point you avoided them?
Crossed the street looking the other way in order to avoid this
tiresome “victim”?

Tonight we’re
having dinner with two old friends who are strong Liberal supporters
– how do I avoid becoming a pain in the ass about what this,
clearly the worst government in BC history, was up to. He is a former
Socred minister, so as we meet, fairly regularly, politics is a
natural discussion – but how can I be part of that discussion when my
rage is white hot and tears only a millimeter away?

I examined my
emotions as I looked again at Dr John Calvert’s piece on the
ridiculously named Clean Energy Bill (elsewhere on this website) a
paper where every sentence makes one angry. Two paragraphs especially
stood out. Here they are:

“To take advantage
of the Government’s politically driven targets for new electricity
supply, private power developers will dam up dozens of additional
rivers all across the province, imposing enormous – and entirely
unnecessary – damage to some of BC’s most precious wilderness
areas. And Hydro will have to build thousands of kilometers of new
transmission lines to service the new power projects, which will do
even more harm to BC’s environment.

The Act is also
designed to promote private sector exports of electricity, exposing
the misleading nature of the Government’s earlier assurances that
its Energy Plans were designed only to meet BC’s domestic energy
requirements. The export agenda will require BC Hydro – and its
ratepayers – to accept the enormous price risks associated with
paying a premium for the developers’ new private power in the hope
that they can recoup this expenditure when selling into the US
market. Contrary to the claims of Minister Lekstrom, this is a recipe
that guarantees private profit by making the public bear the risk.”

There it is – just
what I along with my partner Damien Gillis, along with our colleagues
like Tom Rankin, Joe Foy and Gwen Barlee have been saying for years
now. We are now headlong into a province of private power with rates
set not by what it costs BC Hydro to generate power but what
California, indeed what the market says the price is. And I feel
white-hot rage and bountiful sorrow. For here is the end of W.A.C.
Bennett’s legacy, his dream for BC.

I’m not going to
eulogize Bennett for what he did environmentally in the Kootenays and
Peace River. It was horrendous and along with much of young BC I
raged against it.

But what did he
leave?

We had power, not
clean and green as it was made but clean and green now
because the environment insult was in the past so that now we can
provide clean power at a fraction of the cost on the market.

Why did Bennett do
this?

He perceived power as
a public trust which must be tailored to the needs of British
Columbia. He knew that the private ferry company, Black Ball, would
never take on runs that weren’t profitable and he also knew that
coastal communities would suffer. Realizing that coastal communities
help finance roads and bridges in the Lower Mainland that they would
never use thus the province had an obligation to see that they had
their kind of transportation so he bought Black Ball which became BC
Ferries.

Bennett knew that a
private railway would also never build lines unless they were
profitable, so he took over the old PGE, which became BC Rail.

Bennett knew that we
could have one of the lowest energy costs in the world and that
British Columbians, whether homeowners or industry, ought to benefit
from this. Power became a matter of policy of the government British
Columbians elected and could un-elect.

The Campbell
government has all but destroyed that legacy.

BC Hydro’s
transmission lines have been taken away; BC Hydro is being forced to
buy power from private companies at double or more the export market
value and this on a “take or pay” basis. The annual dividend our
public coffers receive from BC Hydro will be gone, gone south into
the pockets of people like Warren Buffet, leaving us with heavy
operating deficit that drains our public coffers. This all in spite
of the fact that because private companies can’t produce power in
the winter when the water levels are low, BC Hydro (that’s us,
folks) must buy power it can’t use and sell it at a huge loss. If
you need proof of this, ask yourself this question: if private power
will provide power for BC use why do we need Site “C”?

This Energy Policy
has been one long falsehood starting with the ongoing lie that BC is
a net importer of power with Campbell telling us that we must be
energy self-sufficient, which is where private power comes in –
somehow
private power we can’t use will make us self sufficient!

We all expect
governments to gild the lily. We all do that in our private lives but
we don’t expect them to issue one bald-faced lie after another and
build an energy policy on those lies.

I’ve been in
government and while we and the opposition vigorously fought over
policy we both knew that the fight was over ideology or for political
reasons. We might massage the consequences a bit and the opposition
accordingly tell us that we were selling out the province but neither
of us accused the other of lying and keeping the public in the dark.
 

In those days, we had
a media which examined every jot and tittle of policy and
legislation. Every day we were battered by some of the best
journalists in the country. If our government had proposed to have
and expand fish farms, the outcry of the media would have easily
drowned the rage of the opposition. If we had decided to take local
government’s zoning rights away in order to pay off our dear
contributors we would have been the headline story in the news, both
broadcast and print. That’s the way it was and we in government
hated it – but it made us better governors.

I think my rage and
sorrow have been greatly enhanced because I was a cabinet minister
when our feet were held to the fire on a minute by minute basis by an
alert media whose outlets permitted them to say what they wanted.

Now we have the
so-called “Clean Energy Bill”. (By way of aside, if you hear
government and industry, and the lickspittles like Citizens for Green
Power call themselves “green” and/or “clean” you can be sure
that the very opposite is the case).

Among many things
this Bill will castrate the BC Utilities Commission – the public’s
supposed arm’s length regulator – which had the temerity to render
a report that said that the government’s private power policy was
“not in the public interest”. Under this government, God help an
independent commission that calls it like it is.

Our abandonment of
public power in favour of private companies that produce power when
we don’t need it, thus sell it at a huge loss, will be complete
once this bill is passed. We, the long-suffering public, have a
government that piles one lie upon another, a media which is little
more than government shills, and an opposition quite unworthy of the
name.

This means we must do
it ourselves. We must educate ourselves and write the premier and his
MLAs; We must do as Bill Vander Zalm and Chris Delaney are doing with
the HST; and, forgive the vanity support organizations like The
Common Sense Canadian
.

How can this be done?

The famous American
lawyer, Clarence Darrow was asked “how can I ever thank you” and
he replied, “Madam, ever since the Phoenicians invented money
there’s been only one answer to that question.”

We can make the
bastards behave if we write, chant, march and support all who are
fighting full time.

This
must be done if we’re going to leave our province intact for the
young and those to come.

Share
The Peace River Valley

Site ‘C’ and Other Bad Ideas for BC

Share

Site “C” is a bad idea from every point of view.

Let’s first consider if it’s necessary for BC needs. The short answer is that it isn’t, for out of the mouth of BC Hydro we know that with a modicum of conservation, upgrading existing dams, putting generators on flood control dams and taking back – under the Columbia River Treaty – the power we export under that agreement, our needs as far as we can see are taken care of.

Premier Campbell says that there are many “hurdles” to clear, meaning, one assumes, environmental hearings. If we believe that, like Charlie Brown, we believe that Lucy won’t pull the ball away at the last second. There are, you see – two flaws in this statement: first, environmental assessment procedures don’t deal with the question as to whether we want the dam in the first pace; and second, no matter what the reports are, the government can and does what it pleases. If Campbell wants this dam, he’ll have it whether we need it or not – whether we want it or not.

When was the last time a government turned back a project it wanted because an environmental panel didn’t like it?

Will these panels, federal and provincial, consider the loss of 5,340 hectares of land, much of it farmland? Whether or not they consider it, it won’t matter since the Premier knows about that now and by proceeding with the passage has written off all that land.

He’s also written off the animal world including caribou which graze in this area. If we know one thing about Campbell, he doesn’t give a fiddler’s fart about animals, be they be salmon destroyed by fish farms, fish and other wildlife dependent on rivers he’s given away to large offshore companies, nor about the birds that need Burn’s bog for nesting or as a transitional stop while migrating. He’s appointed Environment Ministers who get their jollies by kissing his backside as he ravages the province with their unneeded lickspittle support.

This important question remains unanswered: with all this private power the Premier is so proud of coming from the rivers he’s given away to the likes of Warren Buffett and GE, why aren’t we using that instead of building Site “C” – after all, their supporters prattle on about looking after 500,000 homes here, 500,000 homes there, and 500,000 homes somewhere else?

This is the only honest answer the Premier could give: because private power companies can’t produce energy in the winter when the rivers are so low and when BC Hydro might need it. (Don’t expect that reply because, as we know, honesty is not Campbell’s strong suit).

We must all get this through our collective skulls, folks – Premier Gordon Campbell doesn’t care for the environment other than when it can serve foreign hunters shooting Grizzly Bears, allow Norwegian companies to ravage our waters with fish farms, serve offshore companies he can give our rivers to, or land for his developer friends.

Another product of Campbell’s reckless energy plan is that the cost of energy will skyrocket (and is already doing so) – which will hurt citizens through their power bills and through the loss of jobs, as already hard-hit industries see their energy costs go through the roof (this according to the Joint Industry Electrical Steering Committee that represents large industrial power users). No doubt many are too young to remember WAC Bennett but it was he who developed the “Two Rivers” policy – the Columbia and the Peace – which would make BC self sufficient in energy. We paid a huge environmental price for this but we got what Bennett wanted – the right to charge what we please for power irrespective of what others had to pay.

To Bennett energy pricing should be a matter of government policy, which is to say public policy, so that business could have a lighter burden and British Columbians could pay reasonable prices because the construction costs were long behind us.

This was part of Bennett’s overall plan that included BC Ferries and BC Rail. He knew that private ferry companies and private rail companies couldn’t care less about services for people or creating an incentive for development. In that last regard, much of British Columbia wants tourism very badly because of the near collapse of the lumber industry. Does anyone think for a moment that CN will put in new lines and adjust prices to help these communities?

During the election last May, I was often asked how I could support the NDP given my background as a Socred. The answer was simple.

“Suppose”, I would say, “we have an NDP government that makes a balls up in fiscal management (although how they could do worse than Campbell I don’t know) that can be fixed by another government”.

However, once you lose your rivers and your fish, they’re gone forever!

We didn’t think about that last May and what Damien Gillis, Tom Rankin and I – none of us even remotely interested in socialism – were talking about has come true.

We must start now to fight this regime every way we can, short of violence, to get our province back. And we can start by joining Alexandra Morton in her trek from Sointula to Victoria bringing the protest against fish farming to Campbell & Co with a huge rally at the Legislature Buildings on May 8th – further details at SalmonAreSacred.org.

Share
Islands and farms in the Peace River valley

Site C, HST and truth in B.C. politics

Share

Special for the Common Sense Canadian

The Campbell Liberals’ decision to proceed with Site C is almost as bad as their Harmonized Sales Tax scam because it’s obvious from the content of the Site C announcement that it’s premature – before the proper studies have been done – and so is mainly a PR ploy to try to distract public attention away from the popular revolt against the HST.

Furthermore, the way Premier Gordon Campbell was obviously trying to use the Site C issue to position himself into a province-building legacy akin to W.A.C. Bennett’s is further offensive, especially since he has been deconstructing so much of the legacies like B.C. Hydro and BCRail left by previous governments but also because his spending and taxing choices in general have been so regressive.

Those Vancouver school kids demonstrating against underfunding of education were right on: the Campbell crowd can find hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit a roof for a soccer stadium (and many other dubious spending choices like that) but they won’t find money for school districts to properly fund education, for health boards to properly fund hospitals or for other pressing needs such as welfare and Medicare as well as useful programs such as arts and culture grants.

More recently we have seen a wave of layoffs in the provincial government and it’s no surprise that some of the steepest cuts have come in Ministries such as Environment and Forests that are charged with protecting the public interests while political agencies such as Public Affairs Bureau have generally been spared from such cuts.

It’s clear that the main reason Campbell is doing what he’s doing – bringing in the HST in order to get the $1.6-billion bribe from Ottawa – is to try to minimize his embarrassment over the huge deficit, and especially to try to hide the fact that he lied about the size of that deficit in the previous election campaign, which is unconscionable.

The Site C issue itself is a prime example of Campbell’s deceits: the Campbell Liberals have knowingly misrepresented the state of the province’s energy supplies, claiming we are net importers when really we have an abundance of reliable supplies which we choose to enhance by being clever traders – we import power from Alberta when it’s cheap and we export power to the U.S. when it’s highly profitable.

I am not opposed to economic growth and expansion of power supplies, and I’d even support Site C provided it can be fairly proven to be safe from the engineering perspective and viable from environmental and community perspectives, but I am very opposed to Campbell pushing it ahead prematurely for primarily partisan reasons.

So what we have is Campbell trashing the public interest in many ways and many areas in order to vainly try to rescue his own political reputation. It is disgusting. He must go.

If you haven’t signed the HST petition yet you should ensure you do so well before the July 5 deadline regardless of how you feel about the petition proponent Bill Vander Zalm, whose own record is checkered. That’s because the issues are bigger than the personalities involved, and a vote against the Campbell Liberals’ mismanagement of the HST can also be – and should be – a vote against his mismanagement of many other issues too.

Share