Category Archives: WATER

Enter the Great Bear Rainforest

Share

Starring grizzlies, eagles, humpback whales, and the legendary spirit
bear.
This
magical place is threatened by Enbridge’s proposal to bring an oil
pipeline from the Alberta Tar Sands and supertankers to BC’s North and
Central coast – Gillis was filming for his recently released short
documentary, “Oil in Eden.” This 4 min film captures the highlights of
that experience – featuring breathtaking, never-before-seen footage of
the Great Bear Rainforest!

We highly recommend you try watching this video in 720p or 1080p HD in full screen mode (both buttons located in the bottom right corner of the youtube video player window).

Share

‘Baywatch’ star wants oil tanker ban – Toronto Sun

Share

Toronto Sun – Friday December 10

by Laura Payton

OTTAWA – An actress better known for running on beaches than protecting them
is joining a campaign to ban oil tankers from the south coast of B.C.

Former Baywatch star Pamela Anderson, popular for her bouncing bosom in the
show’s opening credits, lent her famous face to a YouTube video called Oily
Beaches? No Tanks!
A B.C. chapter of the Council of Canadians posted the
video to its YouTube channel.

“A 30-second navigational error could be catastrophic,” Anderson, who grew
up in Ladysmith, B.C., says in the video about the tankers that enter and
exit the Port of Vancouver.

“If there was an oil spill here, I don’t think (the coast) would ever
recover.”

“Oil on the beaches where I grew up? No tanks.”

Supporters of a ban on oil-tanker traffic off the south coast of B.C. argue
the ecosystem is fragile and navigation through relatively shallow water and
underneath the city’s bridges is tough.

Kinder Morgan, the owner of the pipeline that runs into the port, plans to
double capacity and increase the current traffic, which hit 65 tanker loads
last year.

Read full Toronto Sun article here


Share
Columbia Spotted Frog

No Project Left Behind: Ruin of River projects in the Columbia Valley

Share

The
Town of Golden may seem to be a backwater place in the middle of
nowhere, especially in comparison to the sprawling metropolis of the
lower mainland and other booming places in the province. It might
appear that nothing of importance ever happens here. But when it
comes to the environment, and in particular to the rampant push for
independent power producer (IPP) projects, we’ve had to face our
battles just as much as anywhere else.

I’d
like to share with you a little information about what’s
been happening in the Upper Columbia Valley in regards to the IPP
issue. It is not a story that is well known, and this account will
give you insight into the potential long-term environmental
consequences for the region. This story also signifies what is
happening in small towns all over British Columbia.

It
begins with a pristine creek in an out-of-the-way river drainage
called Ventego Creek. Even in our area, where backcountry pursuits
are a way of life, few have heard of this place, and fewer still
would ever dream of traveling into this treacherous valley. Yet,
with helicopters and dynamite, and dreams of entering the “green”
economy, a Nelson-based company called Selkirk Power has imposed
itself on this remote wilderness. Thus, one aspect of this story is
about the disastrous consequences of this project should it go
forward. The company has already embarked on a ruinous fish
translocation project within a unique sub-alpine wetland area. In
the future, half of the drainage will be blasted open to accommodate
new infrastructure with profound environmental consequences. This is
not a suitable location for a run-of-river project.

This
story is also about the wider context of IPP development in the
region, and the province at large. It appears at times, that entire
regions are put up for sale on the auction block, especially when the
region is sparsely populated. In our locale, a geographical area
from Kinbasket Reservoir to Revelstoke Reservoir is threatened by
multiple IPP projects. Should the first project be allowed to
proceed, several other projects are highly likely to follow quickly
on its heels. That is why it is so important to halt Selkirk Power
and its project at Ventego Creek before it starts. We cannot afford
to leave just one project behind.

A
Golden Battle: Independent Power Producer Projects in the Upper
Columbia

To
tell the story in its proper context, a small history of IPP issues
in the Upper Columbia area is required. To date, the residents of the
Golden – a surprisingly active and educated bunch – have managed to
ward off several proposed projects that have threatened to proceed
without a local approval process. Two projects were particularly
contentious between the years 2006-2008, these were smaller
run-of-river projects proposed near the Town of Golden. Next, there
was the company, AXOR Group with a much larger 99MW proposal on
Glacier/Howser. This drew busloads of residents out of their homes to
show opposition to the project. Over 1100 people went to the public
meeting in Kaslo, more than the entire population of that small
Kootenay community!

After
that, there was Atla Energy, a company with three proposals on the
wild and untamed Upper Wood River. This area is so remote that
simply traveling there is an all day affair that involves several
hours of driving, arranging a special ferry, and significant
bushwhacking to access the river. To counter this illogical proposal,
the Golden chapter of Wildsight, assisted by the Council of
Canadians, created a documentary video and distributed it widely. You
can check out the video at:
http://www.wildsight.ca/wood-river-atla-energy-corporation.
Our little ol’ Town of Golden has a long history of success where
these projects are concerned.

Each
project, in one way or another, was stopped dead its tracks. It is
impossible to pin point precisely why or how this was accomplished.
Each case is different and each project lies dormant to different
degrees, for now at least anyways. But this doesn’t mean the
battle is over, far from it in fact. The next proposal has emerged.

Biggest
Regional IPP Threat: Selkirk Power at Ventego Creek

Ventego WetlandsIn
November 2010, it was announced that AXOR, a Canadian leader in the
development of large-scale engineering and construction projects, no
longer holds an Energy Purchase Agreement (EPA) with BC Hydro for the
controversial Glacier/Howser IPP project. This should significantly
slow this project moving forward. This also makes the proposal on
Ventego Creek the next biggest environmental threat in terms of IPP’s
in this region. The proponent, Selkirk Power, has gained its EPA and
is hopeful to begin construction next spring on a single project that
involves developing two adjacent river drainages for a combined 44 MW
project. One drainage, Ventego Creek, is of particular importance
given its high wilderness, ecological and biodiversity values.

Ventego
Creek meanders through a long pristine watershed that extends for
about 18km and is located in the northern Selkirk Mountain range.
The glaciers that feed Ventego sit atop tall mountain peaks, which
form the border with Glacier National Park. At the back of the
drainage there sits a high alpine lake, which plunges into a
spectacular and dramatic waterfall to form the start of the creek.
Ventego Creek is fed by 19 additional tributaries as you go down the
valley, some of which contain spectacular waterfalls of their own.
The valley is steep and the water flows at deathly rates of speed in
some areas. The high velocity of the water flow makes it desirable
for hydropower production.

The
Ventego Creek proposal is of special concern for a variety of
reasons. First, the Ventego drainage has never seen the human hand of
development. There are no roads or even any recreationally used
trails; the foliage is incredibly thick. There are also numerous
avalanche paths in this valley, which makes it prime bear habitat.
Additionally, there has never been a credible scientific wildlife or
plant survey conducted in the Ventego Creek drainage, so we don’t
know the significance of the biodiversity that would be lost were
this project to be approved and move forward.

In
July 2010, a small group of us set out to hike the Ventego Creek
drainage in order to document the area with photographs and raise
awareness about these run-of-river projects. Because of the harsh
conditions, the trip nearly became a deadly survival scenario, with
myself on the receiving end! But that is another story altogether.
Along the way, we conducted an informal wildlife survey of sorts,
simply documenting what we found. We encountered bear daybeds, a
bear rub tree and extensive bear scat. We traveled along multiple
game trails, and were even forced to sleep on one due to the
extensive steepness of the surrounding terrain. We also saw
extensive moose and other ungulate scat, Columbian spotted frogs,
osprey, waterfowl, varied thrush, marsh wren, and many other species
of bird that we were unable to identify. There have also been
unconfirmed reports of Black Wolves spotted in the wintertime, and
even the endangered Mountain Caribou. Clearly, the valley belongs to
someone.

Second,
in the middle of the river drainage there lays a 5.6 km stretch of
unique sub-alpine wetland that has remained unchanged since the last
ice age. The proponent Selkirk Power, has begun a controversial fish
translocation project in the Ventego Wetlands. In order to
compensate for the loss of habitat on neighbouring Cupola Creek, the
company began introducing blue-listed westslope cutthroat trout into
this unique amphibian-filled ecosystem, where previous to the
introduction predatory fish did not exist. This alters the natural
equilibrium that has evolved here. The fish translocation project was
to take place involving a multi-step process, gradually introducing
more and more fish, but significant opposition to the project
emerged. The environmental group Wildsight and a First Nations group
called the Ktunaxa have both taken a stand against it. The fish
translocation has since been halted, an event that was big news for
the environmental community in these parts. The story is available
to read here:
http://www.bclocalnews.com/kootenay_rockies/thegoldenstar/news/108436954.html.
Somehow, the Provincial Ministry of Environment and the Federal
Department of Fisheries and Oceans approved the idea of a fish
translocation into a pristine wetland. This is a clear example of
how these projects can go wrong, despite a rigorous application
process.

Third,
the project offers no public benefit, while the local community
inherits a laundry list of associated problems. The plans for this
project call for a new 8.8 km road extending halfway into Ventego to
the edge of the wetlands, increasing the vulnerability of this
already exploited ecosystem. Blasting for the construction of the
road and the intake pipe will be extensive given the rugged terrain,
further disturbing sensitive animal habitat. Despite assurances from
the proponent, recreational vehicles may begin accessing the drainage
through new road infrastructure, which also increases the potential
to introduce invasive plant species that travel on their tires. The
plans also call for 40 km of associated transmission lines to
interconnect with the nearest Town of Golden. Aside from compromised
aesthetic values, in an area that is surround by four National Parks,
other proponents will piggy-back on the infrastructure resulting in
more projects down the road. Thus, while private power producers
gain profits through the sale of electricity to BC Hydro on public
land, residents of the local area are left to deal with the mess.

A
Story with a Twist: Transmission Lines and IPPs

Ventego Wetlands - helicopter viewAnother
important factor to consider about the project is that it is the
first of a series of proposals within a geographic locale that is
slated for IPP development. The area where Ventego Creek is located
is known to BC Hydro as the Beaver River “cluster.” Selkirk
Powers holds proposals on two creeks within the cluster, further
north there another five proposals held by a large Albertan energy
company named Trans-Alta. Already these creeks are being monitored
with flow measuring equipment and they are waiting on BC Hydro’s
next Clean Power Call for purchase contracts. One of the five
proposals within the Beaver River cluster also lies within a pristine
river drainage, Palmer Creek. Should the first project be approved,
it would greatly facilitate the remaining projects within the
cluster.

The
fact that the IPPs located within the Beaver River cluster will be
developed in tandem with each other was discovered earlier this year
when BC Transmission Corporation (now BC Hydro) sought approval from
the now dismantled BC Utilities Corporation to build a transmission
line. This summer, BC Hydro approved the construction of a 112 km
Columbia Valley Transmission line (CVT line) from Invermere to
Golden. Contained within the application for the transmission line,
there was an economic study conducted for the purpose of estimating
the profits that would be gained through interconnection fees of up
to 24 run-of-river projects in two “cluster”
areas known as Beaver River and Goldstream River. At the present
time, the cluster on Goldstream River is not moving forward, the
Beaver River cluster however, begins with Selkirk Power.

Widespread
opposition exists both to the transmission line and the IPP project
on Ventego Creek. Wildsight vehemently opposed the construction of
the CVT line through a written hearing process. The group made the
argument that BCTC failed to inform the communities of Golden and
Invermere of one of the primary functions of the CVT line – the fact
that it would be used to transport power from the two cluster areas
south into the valley. According to the application for the
transmission line, the development would enable cross-border energy
trade. Furthermore, the Council of Canadians (Golden) has a petition
with over 500 signatures opposing the project on Ventego and Cupola
Creeks. With the provincial government in a state of upheaval, and
with minister portfolios changing at alarming frequency, it is
important that Ventego Creek not be left by the wayside.

Take
Action Now!

As
Selkirk Power is hopeful to begin construction on the project at
Ventego Creek next spring, it is important that we as
environmentally-minded communities come together to take action now.
This IPP project is particularly important to stop because it
threatens a pristine river drainage, an increasingly rare piece of
real-estate in these times of fast development.

However,
there are larger reasons for stopping this project as well. We
cannot sit idly by as the government apportions large tracts of
remote wilderness for sale on the energy market. The Upper Columbia
region is not the only area in the province where transmission lines
are being used to activate large clusters of IPPs within a confined
geographic locale. These projects need to be proven to be in the
public interest, and when pristine areas are threatened, it is very
difficult to make the case that they are.

To
learn more about Selkirk Power’s
projects, visit:
http://www.wildsight.ca/ventegocupola-creeks-selkirk-power

James Knoop is a freelance writer and President  of the Council of Canadians Golden Chapter

Share

Pamela Anderson Says “No Tanks” to South Coast Oil Spill

Share

Watch this new 1 min PSA by Nanaimo filmmaker Paul Manly, starring Pamela Anderson, speaking out to protect the  beaches of her youth from a plan to bring hundreds of oil supertankers a year to the South Coast of BC. The Canadian film and television star, famous for her role on California beaches, grew up on Vancouver Island and says she was horrified to learn of Kinder-Morgan’s proposal to expand its Trans-Mountain pipeline – from the Alberta Tar Sands to Burnaby’s Westport Terminal. The expansion, from 300,000 barrels a day to 700,000, would put the South Coast in grave jeopardy from an oil spill as increasing numbers of tankers navigate the perilous waters of Burrard Inlet and the Strait of Juan de Fuca en route to Asia and the United States.

Share

BC Oil Tanker Ban Motion Passes in Commons

Share

The House of Commons has adopted an NDP motion calling for a ban on crude-oil tanker traffic off British Columbia’s north coast.

But the motion, which was passed 143-138, is non-binding and is likely to be ignored by the Conservative government.

Canada has had an unofficial moratorium on tankers off B.C.’s north coast for decades. But New Democrat MP Nathan Cullen, the B.C. MP who put forward the opposition motion, said it is vital to enshrine the unwritten moratorium in legislation.

It comes as Calgary-based Enbridge Inc. has proposed sending up to 225 oil tankers every year out of the port of Kitimat to carry crude oil to new markets such as Asia and the western United States as part of its Northern Gateway project, which also includes a proposed pipeline from Alberta to the port.

A coalition of First Nations, commercial fisheries and environmental groups from the Pacific Northwest Coast has called for a ban on oil tankers in the region, claiming the local economy is in jeopardy because of increased traffic.

Read full CBC article here 

http://www.cbc.ca/politics/story/2010/12/07/oil-tanker-motion.html#ixzz17X62NeLr

Share

Kitimat Councillor Steps Down From Enbridge Community Advisory Board

Share

Tuesday, December 07, 2010 03:53 AM

Kitimat, B.C. – A Kitimat councillor has stepped down from the Enbridge Community Advisory Board, calling the process a “sham”. 
 
Randy Halyk says he originally joined the board because he felt that Kitimat should have a voice, that it was a good way to find out about the positives and negatives of the Northern Gateway Pipeline, and open a dialogue with Enbridge. However, he says the CAB has morphed since its early days and has degenerated into and Enbridge vehicle to stifle community participation.
 
“Throughout this time the group was changing, the vacant chairs where being filled, new faces appeared around the table but not one citizen of Kitimat only companies set to make a profit. The CAB is now ostensibly made up of project supporters from the Lower Mainland, from Terrace with a few from Kitimat including our EDO, with the remaining being Enbridge Staff.
 
Furthermore, I don’t know how you can call what remains, “a Community Advisory Board” when most members are from out of town and the region. “
Read full Opinion250 article here

Share

Tanker Ban: The Vote to Protect BC’s Fragile North Coast

Share

Nathan Cullen is the member of Parliament for the riding of Skeena-Bulkley Valley

 

Last week the House of Commons spent some hours debating an issue uniquely West Coast but also critical to Canada: whether or not we need a legislated ban on supertanker traffic plying the waters of BC’s north and central coast. The vote will be cast Tuesday.

It’s not often that Canada’s Parliament looks across the Rockies to cast an opinion on a debate that is familiar and passionate to those of us fortunate to live in this stunningly beautiful province.

New Democrats have long suggested that the vagueness of the Federal government’s policy towards tankers on the coast creates an environment of damaging uncertainty not just for business but more importantly for the people of the coast.

Read full op-ed by Nathan Cullen in the Vancouver Sun here

 
 Last week the House of Commons spent some hours debating an issue uniquely West Coast but alcritical to Canada: whether or not we need a legislated ban on supertanker traffic plying the waters of BC’s north and central coast. The vote will be cast TuesdayIt’s not often that Canada’s Parliament looks across the 

Share

Mad as Hell About Bogus Hydro Rate Increases

Share


It must be a good
line because this is the third time in a week I’ve used H.L. Mencken’s great
line “Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit upon his hands,
hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.” After reading the
news item that BC Hydro is asking to raise its rates by 27% for upgrading their
facilities, then reading the next day it was 55% for “badly needed projects” I
found myself once more reaching for my trusty cutlass.  

Is there no end to
what we’re asked to believe? John Horgan, NDP Energy critic, was bang-on when
he linked this to the outrageous $50 BILLION that BC
Hydro owes Independent Power Producers (IPPs) for dams that destroy our rivers
and send power not to BC Hydro but to the United States. Would that the
NDP deals with private power in stark, unadorned English instead of the sloppy
diarrhea that oozes from its program as laid down a few days ago by their now
soon to be former leader. 

How dumb do they
think we are? Are we to believe that there’s a magic energy fairy at the bottom
of the garden who will give Hydro that $50 Billion and rising? This is close
to, if not there, plain fraud.  

The plain fact is
that every householder not courting bankruptcy knows that you cannot hide a
massive debt that is going to build IPPs on our dime, then soak Hydro (meaning
us, folks) to the heavens when it’s forced to buy private power that they don’t
need. 

I want to say this
succinctly and in plain English. Our BC Hydro, one of the best
energy companies in the world, has no need of more energy yet is forced to buy
power from IPPs that they don’t need – meaning they either sell it on the
market for ½ or less of what they pay for it or use it instead of their own
power at 12 times their own cost of making it

 All together,
now, let’s read that paragraph again and march to our nearest antique shop for
cutlasses. 

One would think – at
least an outsider not au fait with BC politics might – that some politician
would take up the cudgels on our behalf! (By the way, if you’re sensitive to
bloodshed, buy a cudgel rather than a cutlass). Here we have a Liberal
leadership with half a dozen or more candidates and not a word will be uttered
about the following: IPPs, farmed salmon, destruction of agricultural land, oil
pipelines and tankers filled with Tar Sands sludge. Not a peep will you hear!
Not a word even in defence because none of them has the guts to even defend
Liberal policies much less oppose them. 

In the unlikely event
that the NDPs recover enough to be in the hunt in the next election, where the
hell is their courage? 

I’ll tell you where.
The NDP’s now soon-to-depart leader, Carole James, has been reaching out to the
business community, as if that has a chance, and doesn’t want to unduly worry
the captains of industry who look upon the environmental disgraces given us by
Pinocchio Campbell & company as great steps forward. 

Ms has James talked
about the IPP fixes in terms of “sanctity of contract.” These deals are
more like those of a hoodlum mayor of a city who hands out plush contracts to
his brother-in-law – they would make “Boss Tweed” of New York, “Boss
Prendergast” of Kansas City, or Chicago’s Richard Daleys, pere
et fils, blush with pride yet the NDP position is “sanctity of contract!” 

What are the options we’re
left with? 

One is to join one of
the major parties and try to make them change their policy. That should be a
remedy but, alas, it won’t work. Political parties are run by the few at the
top and all resolutions they don’t like are either not brought forward for
debate or are so watered down as to be pre-digested mush. 

Another would be to
support the Greens, something I would do in a flash if I thought they could
even win a seat but they can’t and won’t. The Greens, decent honourable people
who want to save and protect the environment often get anger with me at public
meetings when I say this but have no answer when I point out that after 25
years they haven’t elected a soul, indeed haven’t even been close. (At a recent
speech I gave in Courtenay, a “Green” lady went to the floor mic, obviously
annoyed at what I had said, and said this:- the reason the Green Party hasn’t
elected anybody is that they don’t get enough votes!” God’s truth! 

You could encourage
and join a third “middle-of-the-road”

Party if one comes
forward. The logical people to make this happen are Chris Delaney and/or Gordon
Wilson. Delaney already has a party, BC First, and if meat can be put on those
bones it becomes a rational option.

There is something,
however, we all can do and indeed must do – raise Hell; such Hell that whoever
runs for office will know that the electorate is white hot with anger. We must
show all politicians that we will take action no matter where the latest
environmental abuse occurs – action even including civil disobedience. We must
do this even if it isn’t the particular “outrage” that grabs us most.

Damien and I have
started to tour the province and starting next February we will bring our
presentation, including videos, a local voice, and my own.

Let me close with
this: you can always get rid of a bad government and restore the economy with
another.

What you can’t do is
get the environment back – once lost it stays lost.

If you haven’t
started to fight yet, now’s a very good time to start. If you have started, it’s
a great time to intensify the fight and encourage others to do the same.

We have a long way to go and the bad guys have
all the money. Yet, if we all do decide with sharpened cutlasses to get into
the fight and stay with it, we can and will beat the bastards and leave a
legacy for future generations.

Share

Bute Inlet Private Power Proposal – Update

Share

An excellent summary by Lannie Keller from Friends of Bute Inlet of the campaign to stop the largest proposed private hydro power project in Canadian history – GE and Plutonic Power’s plan to dam and divert 17 rivers at the head of Bute Inlet on the Sunshine Coast. Lannie updated the crowd at the “Take Back Our BC” event on Quadra Island on November 7, about the latest details of the 1,027 megawatt proposal (worth at least $20 Billion to the corporations involved) and the citizen campaign to save the ecologically diverse and visually spectacular Bute.

Share

Save BC Hydro!

Share

Thanks to the work of economist Erik Andersen we have a much clearer view of what the Campbell government has done to British Columbia Hydro, what they are obviously going to do, and what the consequences will be.

 
BC Hydro is, so to speak, an integral part of the Province’s family jewels. It was created by Premier W.A.C. Bennett to be a tool of government policy. Bennett could see that if BC was to develop it had to have cheap, available electric power, so he implemented the “Two Rivers Policy,” whereby large electric dams were built on the Peace and Columbia Rivers. This was at a huge environmental cost but it produced just what Bennett wanted – cheap, available and uninterrupted electric power. His success was little short of miraculous.
 
Let’s look at what’s happened in the past decade. Our great public power company has been forced to make unconscionable bargains with private companies (IPPs) which dam our rivers and sell the power to BC Hydro when they are able to do so, i.e. their rivers are high enough, which is mostly during the period BC Hydro has lots of electricity and full reservoirs.

Here’s the kicker (to our backside, big time): this means that BC Hydro faces two options – it can export this power at half or less than they paid for it, or they can use it at 12 times what they can make it for themselves. (this is your business oriented government at work, folks!)
 
Clearly, this state of affairs can only be dealt with in two ways – BC Hydro goes broke or we pay enormously increased electricity bills. In fact, if BC Hydro is sold or goes broke, the public loses all control and we get huge increases anyway.
 
What we have from Erik Andersen is confirmation of this catastrophe. Erik has also taken a look at some of the accounting “methods” of BC Hydro.
 
For example, the BC Auditor-General has had a similar look. The books disclose how Hydro in fiscal 2009 went from a real loss of about $700 million to a “profit” of about $550 Million. (When you’ve read this, try it on your own bank manager). 
 
Here’s what they do. They have what they call a “Regulated Asset Account”. (I warn you that the old shell game is going to look honest in comparison). They then take their expenses for that year and bundle this into the RAA and, because we the taxpayers pay BC Hydro’s bills, make this RAA into an “Account Receivable” and, are you ready for this, it becomes an asset (based on their ability to jack up our power bills to cover the difference) and POOF! There go their losses. The Auditor General has told BC Hydro not to do that anymore!!
 
How much is involved in this (in Andersen’s words) “hanky panky?”
 
Hold onto your hats again. In 2005 the amount in the RAA was zero – now it’s about $4 BILLION. This scheme is, according to Andersen, a “reckless endangerment” to the province and BC Hydro.
 
Why is this happening?
 
Mr. Andersen states the obvious, which is important because the government won’t. Andersen points out that this simply cannot be accidental – therefore BC Hydro must be being deliberately set up to fail.
 
What we have from Erik Andersen’s work is confirmation that BC Hydro is going down the tube and will only last as long as it can continue to raise our rates in order to stay afloat!
 
One is reminded of an adage of Woody Allen’s which I’ve cited, only changing “world” to “BC Hydro”:
 
“More than any time in history BC Hydro faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness, the other to total extinction. Let us pray that we have the wisdom to choose correctly.”
 
If, like the Campbell Liberals, you want BC Hydro privatized – because you believe in the Fraser Institute’s doctrine that publicly-owned assets must go to private companies – it doesn’t matter much whether you sell or abandon. The numbers with BC Hydro are huge on both sides of the ledger but its actual profit is only big time if a private owner can own it and run it free of government intervention. It is for that very reason W.A.C. Bennett bought ought the BC Electric Company and created BC Hydro.
 
From the Liberals’ point of view, selling off BC Hydro, after the fuss the public made when BC Rail was sold, makes no political sense, making bankruptcy a more attractive way to go.
 
Thus it’s clear that to save our rivers and their ecologies, we must save BC Hydro. 
 
To save BC Hydro, we must all get angry as hell and, in every way we can, take that message not only to the Liberal government but the NDP as well. From every corner of the province must come the cry “Save Our BC Hydro!”
 
The government must know, with no room for doubt, that not one more IPP project will be permitted and that we will take every available measure to stop them – starting right now!
 
 

Share