Category Archives: Canada

Scientist Quits Provincial Panel on Tar Sands Over Government Muzzling

Share

From The Calgary Herald – Feb 2, 2011

by Kelly Cryderman

CALGARY – Just days after the makeup of a provincial panel
meant to revamp oilsands monitoring was announced, an American member
has quit saying there’s not enough scientists in the group and the
Alberta government wants to muzzle free discussion.

“I’m
concerned that First Nations may think this is yet another snow job by a
bunch of experts who speak a lot of technical speak,” said Helen
Ingram, a University of California-Irvine professor emeritus who
specializes in public policy on water resources.

However,
Alberta Environment argues there are eight scientists on the panel with
PhDs, and rules governing disclosure of information by panel members
have yet to be finalized.

Ingram and 11 others were named
by Alberta Environment Minister Rob Renner last Thursday as members of a
panel to provide recommendations for creating a “world-class
environmental monitoring system” for the oilsands.

The
group, which meets for the first time next week, is co-chaired by Hal
Kvisle, who retired as president and chief executive of Trans­Canada
Corp. last year, but is still an adviser to the pipeline company.
TransCanada moves thousands of barrels per day of oilsands products to
market and is seeking environmental approval for the $7-billion Keystone
XL project to transport more bitumen to U.S. refiners.

The
other co-chair is Howard Tennant, the former president and
vice-chancellor of the University of Lethbridge. Other members include
public health experts, biological science and geology professors,
environmental consultants, a vice-president from the Canadian
Association of Petroleum Producers and a former adviser to Prime
Minister Stephen Harper.

Even though she’s “really . . . concerned that the tarsands get appropriate monitoring,” Ingram gave her notice on Tuesday.

Her
three main concerns were that the panel schedule set doesn’t allow for
her to attend key meetings, there are too few physical scientists – such
as hydrologists – on the panel, and early instructions suggested she
and other members would not be able to discuss oilsands issues with
scientific colleagues or others without first getting the permission of
the minister.

Ingram said she’s used to some level of confidentiality while sitting on panels, but this seemed a step too far.

Read full article

Share

Issues NDP Can Win On…If They’re Smart Enough

Share

The New Liberal leader will, on several questions, be like the fighter sitting on his stool and refusing to answer the bell because he knows he’s going to get the crap knocked out of him.

One of those is BC Rail.

Another is private v public power which, in essence, is combined into Campbell’s so-called run-of-river policy.

We must all know that no matter who the leader is, he/she will duck these issues and they will be greatly aided by the mainstream media people who are not allowed, apparently, to bring them up.

For the NDP this is a glorious opportunity to win, outright, two huge issues – but before they can do that they must establish their understanding of these two issues and offer solutions.

The NDP didn’t have the opportunity to really deal with BC Rail for the serious stuff was before the courts and no one would have believed that the Liberals would shut the case down just as former Minister of Finance, Gary Collins, and the Premier himself were to give evidence.

On the Energy/Rivers issue the NDP was woefully weak in the election campaign. For much of the campaign the NDP candidate could only sloganize (a new word I just invented) with such puffery as “we’ve got to stop giving our rivers away”, which was true but scarcely did the issue justice. The NDP have a history of sloganizing – neat little ditties that mask ignorance or lack of courage or both. They bring an appropriate giggle and applause at NDP bun tosses but do nothing to enlighten the voter or present a solution.

First, then, the NDP must show that it understands the colossal and perfidious – in the sense of cheating citizens – policy the Gordon Campbell government have us involved in. The giveaway is immense – large corporations get subsidized by the public to get paid double or more what their power is worth by BC Hydro (at a huge loss), for power that’s not for British Columbians but for export.  

Read that again. It defies belief doesn’t it? And until this issue is understood by political parties it won’t be understood by the public.

The secret contracts BC Hydro is forced to make are unconscionable. The NDP must pledge to make them public and if they are indeed unconscionable, refuse to honour them. The analogy is rather like the mayor elected to clean up city hall, then, when elected, promising to honour all the sweetheart deals his predecessor made with his family and cronies.

Politics is a tough game and demands courageous answers to difficult questions. This means that the party itself must understand the issues and have the platform very firm on what’s wrong and what must happen.

This is not easy, for the business community will scream and the NDP has done a lot of work to make inroads there. Business people, in general, don’t like the NDP anyway but smaller business people are far easier to deal with. Once the policy is in place, NDP spokespeople around the province must speak, with knowledge, to the people all around BC, the business community being welcome. They won’t be the only ones out in the communities speaking on this subject.

I do know of one NDP candidate who thoroughly understands this issue – John Horgan. Others may also understand and we at The Common Sense Canadian would welcome a blog from any other leadership candidate interested in letting our readership hear their view.

I’m often accused of being a turncoat because I was once a Social Credit Minister.

Sticks and stones etc … I’ve been a strong environmentalist for a great many years. I don’t believe for one second that Premier Bill Bennett would have jeopardized – hell, killed – BC Hydro for any reason much less by forcing them to pay private companies double for energy it didn’t need meaning they had to export it at a huge loss.

If he had believed that, we’d never have met, let alone become colleagues.

I believe with every fiber that the saving of our environment – our salmon, our rivers and the ecologies they support – is far and away the biggest political issue of the day. As I often said during the last election – a government might be a very bad government on fiscal issues but if it is, that can be fixed by a new government.

Once you lose your farmland, your fish, your rivers and the ecologies they support, you can never get them back.

Share

Lawrence Martin: What Direction for Canada’s Troubled Democracy?

Share

From the Globe & Mail – Feb 1, 2011

by Lawrence Martin

Will the Arab states cascade into the splendid embrace of democracy the way the Soviet states did two decades ago?

The
tumult in Tunisia and Egypt brings to mind two things. One is those
Soviet years when I was stationed in Moscow for this newspaper. Another
is the weakened state of Canadian democracy and whether we’re prepared
to do anything about it.

When Mikhail Gorbachev introduced the politics of glasnost
in 1985, everyone thought it was a ruse, just another blast of Soviet
propaganda. But that policy was what set the stage for freedom’s rise
and the Cold War’s close.

For the Arab states of North Africa and
the Middle East, there’s no grand political overseer who can loosen the
strings as Mr. Gorbachev did. What was remarkable was that he had the
entire Soviet police state apparatus at his disposal, as well as the
military. Despite deteriorating economic conditions, he could have
maintained a totalitarian lock on power. But he was enlightened enough
about the West to know how his system compared.

By coincidence,
the current upheavals take place a year after Canadians took to the
streets to stage, by comparison, their own trifling protests against, by
comparison, smallish abuses of their democratic system by their
government. Specifically, it was Stephen Harper’s government’s decision
to suspend Parliament in the wake of the Afghan detainees controversy
that sparked the protest. But that suspension was only one in a long
line of affronts in recent times.

There’s been so many that
Democracy Watch is calling for a grassroots Coffee Party movement.
Democracy Watch is a small group but, since its inception in 1993, it’s
been one of the most persistent in trying to hold Liberal and
Conservative governments to account. It isn’t government-funded, and it
isn’t easily intimidated.

Most everywhere it turns, it can see
which way our democracy is headed. On the question of openness and
access to information – our very own glasnost – Canada finished
last in a recent survey of five parliamentary democracies. On the
question of political morality, the governing Conservatives have made
personal attack ads, as Green Party Leader Elizabeth May lamented
Monday, the new normal.

The Conservatives had a plan – a good one –
to replace our rancid system of patronage appointments with a public
appointments commission. But it was scuttled. They had hopes our Senate
could be democratized. A good idea, too. But instead, it’s been filled
with Conservative cronies.

Owing to brutal partisanship,
Parliament’s committee system has become increasingly dysfunctional.
Watchdog groups such as the Integrity Commissioner’s Office have been
turned into lapdogs. The public service’s policy development function,
once significant, has been blunted. An unprecedented government-wide
vetting system instituted by the Tories has stifled free speech.

Read full article

Share

Environment Minister Kent targets critics in first major speech

Share

From the Times-Colonist – Jan 28, 2011

by Linda Nguyen

TORONTO — Federal Environment Minister Peter Kent has only been on
the job for three weeks but says he’s already tired of the criticism
from people who think the government is not taking any action on the
environment.

“As an aside, just weeks into this job let me
say how especially frustrating I find the constant, critical refrain
that this government has no environment plan,” he said Friday in Toronto
during a noon-hour speech with the Economic Club of Canada.

“Not only do we have one, we are one of the very few countries that does.”

Canada
also does not need to enact any new laws to deal with the issue of
climate change or reach targets for greenhouse gas emissions, Kent told
the crowd in his first major speech since being promoted to the
high-profile portfolio earlier this month.

“What many
people don’t realize is that Environment Canada already has the legal
tools it needs to execute our plan,” said Kent, who was most recently
Foreign Affairs minister. “It requires no new legislation.”

He is the fourth environment minister to serve under the Stephen Harper government since it was elected in 2006.

Read full article

Share

Ecojustie on Updating Water Act: B.C.’s water to be sold to the highest bidder?

Share

From Ecojustice.ca – Jan 26, 2011

by Randy Christensen

For the past several years, there has been a multitude of discussion papers, extensive public consultations and big speeches from the B.C. Government on the effort to “modernize” the B.C. Water Act. It’s the law that governs who gets to use water, for what, when, where, and who gets the priority when there’s not enough to go around.

Everyone agrees the systems is broken, it’s only a question of what to do about it.

All of the public statements from June 2008 until December 2010 were unambiguous in promising strong legal protections for environmental flows and revisiting the antiquated and highly problematicfirst in time, first in right system.” More importantly, the B.C. Government de-emphasized the potential adoption of “market reforms” such as “water rights trading” that has devastated communities around the globe.

But what was a well-intentioned and well-managed process seems to have fallen victim to B.C.’s current political turmoil. In late December the B.C. Government posted the “proposed framework” for new water laws that in introduces water rights trading (section 5). Troublingly, the strong legal protections for environmental flows have been downgraded to guidelines that merely have to be “considered” when someone wants to take water from a stream (section 1).

In the current leadership vacuum, those managing the process have become politically risk adverse and are simply defaulting to the blueprints of conservative governments around the world. This approach downplays the need for good governance and views markets as a solution that solvers any and all problems.

Read full story

Share

Environmental Battles Unite British Columbians

Share

With the leadership of both major parties up for grabs you should know what The Common Sense Canadian will be doing from now until the next election.

First let me assure you that we are not party-political. We simply support the party that declares for the environment.

Thanks to a conspiracy of silence, the mainstream media have simply ignored environmental issues with the exception of making Letters to the Editor and Op-ed space available to those who would desecrate our environment.

We have seen some significant changes in the environmental movement over the last couple of years with much fuller contact between various groups. More and more The Common Sense Canadian has had speakers and other support from colleagues and we’ve been returning the favour when we can. To name but a few, people like Joe Foy and Gwen Barlee from he Wilderness Committee, the in comparable Alex Morton, Rex Weyler, Donna Passmore, many others and I have found ourselves on the same platform, meaning, among other benefits, we get to know one another better. Our collective pledge is to help each other and to ensure each of us that their struggle is ours too. For far too long governments have been able to divide us and I believe we are quickly coming together – as we must.

We are working hard to bring expert opinion to our web page not only on our own account but from others as well.

We have both senior governments to thank for this because they have assaulted the environment in so many fields it’s galvanized those who care and brought unity where there was once conflict and indifference.

Damien Gillis and I founded The Common Sense Canadian because in fighting for our rivers in the ’09 election we saw that our talents mixed beautifully. We’ve assembled a marvellous group of contributors, advisors, and even a first class cartoonist, Gerry Hummel, whom you’ll be seeing much more of.

We are and have for a long time been appalled at how the desecraters of our environment have got away with it. There are exceptions – thank God for that! – in smaller communities, and we’ll be asking them to help us let the public know what we’re up to and when Damien and I are coming to show his videos and hear our message.

Share

Environment Low on Agendas of Lib Leader Candidates

Share

From TheTyee.ca – Jan 21, 2011

by Andrew MacLeod

Environmental issues were prominent in the 2009
election, with Premier Gordon Campbell’s carbon tax giving him claim to
the green high ground over the Carole James-led NDP which campaigned to
axe a tax many environmentalists supported.

While there are varying opinions on whether
those positions made a difference to either side’s results, less than
two years later none of the candidates to replace Campbell appear ready
to pick up the green agenda.

Indeed, there have been few mentions of
environmental issues in the Liberal race. Former cabinet minister and
recent talk radio host Christy Clark has mentioned the green technology sector and jobs. Others have staked out where they stand on the carbon tax, with Kevin Falcon pledging to freeze it after 2012 and George Abbott saying he would hold a referendum on whether or not to freeze it.

But nobody in the running to be the next premier has really claimed the issue.

As Nathan Cullen, a federal NDP member of
parliament who considered entering the race to replace James heading the
BC NDP sees it, “The Liberals are running scared away from Campbell’s
climate change work, some of which needs to be enhanced and continued.”

And environmentalists — some of whom are
encouraging people to join the parties and try to sway the campaigns —
are wondering whether there will be anyone to support in the Liberal
race.

Read full article

Share
Pinocchio Campbell - detail of Common Sense Canadian cartoon by Gerry Hummel

BC Liberals’ Four Big Lies & Why the Media Ignore Them

Share

From my present vantage point a very long way from home the news briefs and emails I receive are very disturbing. It seems pretty clear that the next premier will bear no scars from his/her involvement with the Campbell administration. Indeed, it almost seems as if the media are already looking back at the Campbell times with a melancholy longing for those great days.

One expects that sort of rubbish from the Liberal Party itself, but from the media?

In due course, before the new leader is nominated, there will be a big banquet for Campbell as if he deserved honour instead of contempt. He will be the man that brought the economy back from those bad old days of socialism and marshaled our resources, blah, blah, blah…

As has been well said, one is entitled to one’s own opinion but not to one’s own set of facts.

Let me try using the truth, leaving the benefits of policy open to everyone’s own opinion. I say to you, however, that on four material issues – issues that go, as the lawyers say, to the root of the matter – the government, either through ministers or the Premier himself, lied. I know that’s a harsh word but how else can one describe falsehoods in the face of clear evidence to the contrary?

Let’s start with BC Rail. The lies are firmly on the record. Campbell, in the 1996 election, to try and save his electoral bacon, promised not to privatize BC Rail. He made the same solemn vow when he was elected in 2000. Not only did he lie, the deal does not, to say the very least, pass the smell test.

Now let’s look at the Campbell lies during the 2009 election about the financial affairs of the province. By almost every reckoning the figure is much higher, but out of caution, the difference in the state of affairs between the 2009 budget and the reality was at least $1 billion and both his toady Finance Minister, Colin Hansen, and the Premier stated that they didn’t have any idea that such was the real state of the province’s finances during the election when they were telling the voters that they were superb trustees of the public purse. This is as impossible to believe as any little boy who’s stolen a candy bar and, with chocolate all over his face, denies it. If the Deputy Finance Minister and his crew of able economists did not know by the time of the 2009 budget that the province was in trouble big time they should all have been sacked. Never mind the subtleties, a look at tax figures, which are readily available on a current basis, would have set alarm bells ringing. I know that from personal experience when my colleague, Finance Minister Hugh Curtis, correctly predicted a year or more in advance the recession of the early 1980s and demonstrated to Cabinet the evidence, which was not rocket science.

The lies by toady Hansen and Pinocchio Campbell on the HST scarcely need repeating. The evidence that they had decided to implement the HST long before they were denying it on the hustings is blatant.

Campbell and Hansen have also lied through their teeth on the broad issues of energy and the environment. I think one reason these bastards are getting away with it is because the series of falsehoods is so egregiously corrupt that normal people have trouble believing it.

Many environmentalists, closer to issues than I, have spoken out on the assault on the Agricultural Land Reserve, the desecration of wilderness, and consequent massive assaults on the atmosphere. Donna Passmore has been tireless and we can only thank providence that she and others like her have their health and dedication.

Rex Weyler, one of the most respected environmentalists on earth is leading a fight against Tar Sands Oil being piped to our South Coast into supertankers. A punctured pipeline or wrecked tankers are not acceptable “risks” – they’re not “risks” at all, in fact, but mathematical certainties. Rex has the full support of The Common Sense Canadian on this front. Our allies on the North and Central Coast, such as the tireless Ian McAllister, are waging a similar battle against the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline from the Tar Sands to Kitimat.

I have no idea how Alexandra Morton keeps going as she fights huge international corporations, both senior governments and an industry that spends millions on sugar-coated lies as she carries on her fight to save our precious salmon from destruction from the impacts of lice and disease infected fish farms. We at The Common Sense Canadian have fought shoulder to shoulder with Alex and the fight goes on.

How to begin the defence of our rivers and the saving of BC Hydro?

Colin Hansen is a good place to start. A particularly telling interview of his is still online.

This is the senior cabinet minister we’re dealing with and every statement he makes in this 1:51 interview is false – I would accuse him of lying but I don’t want to deprive him of the defence of being a damned, easily led fool.

He tells us BC is a net importer of power – we aren’t. Sometimes BC Hydro imports power from its neighbours in Alberta and Washington State, only to sell it back to them at a profit soon thereafter. The fact is that BC is as a rule a net exporter of power. Hansen claims private power plants are little operations that don’t impede the flow the river – it’s “run of the river”. I’m tempted to call this one as it is, a goddamned lie!

These are small sort of Mom and Pop undertakings! Right, Colin, like General Electric, Ledcor and the Dupont family!

This private power will help BC be energy self-sufficient. Honestly, folks, it’s getting very hard to keep my pledge! The short answer to this is that private power is for the most part generated during the Spring run-off when there is sufficient water for them to produce. This is precisely the time BC Hydro doesn’t need power yet they must take it anyway under the agreements they’ve been forced to sign.

Here’s the skinny. BC Hydro must take private power on a “take or pay” basis, meaning it must pay for power it doesn’t need. Now here comes the neat part – the price BC Hydro must pay is 2-3 times what it can export it for! Or about 12 times what it costs them to make it themselves!

I must move on but here’s a little cherry for your martini. Traditionally BC Hydro has paid a dividend to our government to build hospitals, schools and so on. Now they will have no profit so no dividend because all the profits are going to large corporations. Now, even of you still believe the Campbell/Hansen bullshit – try this. BC Hydro has applied for a rate increase, out of your hides so they can give some of it back to you by way of that dividend!

Why has all this happened? God knows – so does Wendy! – how often I’ve asked myself that question. It’s sheer madness! No man or government would do this to their province, would they?

Only one answer makes sense – political philosophy can account for this. This is Milton Friedman stuff. It’s Fraser Institute holy writ! (Fazil Milhar, former senior fellow of The Fraser Institute is the Editor of the editorial page of the Vancouver Sun, which may help us understand the media’s role in this).

It’s Bilderberger, Davos stuff. It’s the New Order, Corporate World. It has nothing whatever to do with the good of the people. The same people bundling sub-prime mortgages, going broke, taking government handouts then paying themselves million dollar bonuses are running things all over the world.

Re-read or read for the first time Thomas Friedman’s The Lexus and the Olive Tree which explains what has happened and did it before it happened.

We have only one chance left – we must throw this government out at the earliest opportunity! No ifs, ands, or buts – this rotten bunch has to go.

It will be tough because they have a strategy – don’t answer any questions by The Common Sense Canadian, Donna Passmore, Rex Weyler, Alex Morton, The Wilderness Committee. Ignore them as if they didn’t exist! Fight the next election on other issues and remember that the folks in the media who used to ask tough questions aren’t asking them any more. Read Vaughn Palmer, Mike Smyth, listen to Bill Good or Christy Clark and tell me when over the past decade any of them covering BC affairs as an editorialist have truly held the government’s feet to the fire on the issues I’ve raised here.

There are only two answers – either all the fighters I’ve mentioned are full of crap, or the fix is in.

The next British Columbia electorate will decide, and for a very long time, whether the province is to be run by corrupt corporate boards with a bought-and-paid-for government or by us.

 

Share

Audio: Damien Gillis on CHLY’s ‘Sense of Justice’

Share

Listen to this feature chat on Nanaimo-based CHLY’s Sense of Justice show with host Rae Kornberger. The Common Sense Canadian’s Damien Gillis discusses private river power, oil tankers, and making the environment a key issue in this pivotal year for BC politics.

Click here to listen – choose the “2011/01/12 a discussion of IPP’s” in the top left corner of the audio player. It my take a few seconds to load.

Share

Alexandra Morton Declines NDP Offer to Run for Vancouver Island North

Share

From The Courier-Islander – Jan 12, 2011

by Dan McLennan

Outspoken biologist Alexandra Morton will not seek the federal NDP’s
Vancouver Island North nomination. After being approached by the NDP a
week ago, Morton announced her decision Tuesday morning.

“When
the NDP contacted me about running for Vancouver Island North Member of
Parliament, I first said ‘no’ and then I reconsidered it because I’ve
lived in these communities for 26 years and I’ve seen how political
decisions have torn us apart and destroyed us,” Morton told the
Courier-Islander.

“But after six days of over 1,000 people
emailing me – and I’m very thankful for all they said to me because I
learned an enormous amount – I decided that when I spoke, if I became a
political candidate, people wouldn’t know whether it was really my
thoughts and the truth as I see it, or was I supporting the party line,
or was I supporting a caucus member in the hope that they would support
me in another decision. So I decided not to run.”

Read full article

Share