Category Archives: Salmon Farming and Aquaculture

Shades of Green: The Sockeye Salmon Murder Mystery

Share

The puzzle of British Columbia’s disappearing Fraser River sockeye is unfolding like a classical murder mystery. Suspects abound. Suspicion has fallen on such culprits as atypical ocean predators, unusual algae blooms, overfishing, inadequate food supplies, and threatening high temperatures in both marine and river ecologies. Each suspect has been carefully investigated and each may have inflicted some injury on the hapless sockeye. But the prime suspect is the salmon farming industry, the Norwegian corporations that have located multitudes of open net-pens in BC’s West Coast waters – many crucially situated along the migration routes of the victimized sockeye.

The salmon farming industry possesses the three primary characteristics that make it the prime suspect in this murder investigation: motive, opportunity and means.

The motive is profit. Corporations have discovered that open net-pens are the most lucrative way of rearing farmed salmon. When Norway tightened restrictions on its salmon farming industry because of the proliferation of diseases and parasites in North Atlantic wild salmonids, Norwegian corporations saw their profits being constrained by controls and costs. Their quest for continuing expansion and profit was curtailed.

The perfect opportunity for expansion and profits appeared in coastal BC. The province was eager to boost coastal economies with a new industry, the waters were pristine and cold, regulations were minimal, and supervision was casual, trusting and accommodating. The corporations, of course, promised investment and jobs. This new environment was open, innocent and unburdened by the experience and disasters that had occurred in the North Atlantic. BC was the perfect opportunity to expand the industry and satisfy ever-hungry shareholders.

Corporate character and history are also relevant in this murder mystery. When salmon farming was known to cause environmental problems in North Atlantic waters, when countries such as Norway, Scotland, Ireland and England all had negative experiences with salmon farming, the Norwegian corporations knew that suspicion would likely fall on similar operations in BC. Indeed, parasites and diseases have plagued operations wherever open net-pen salmon farming has been practiced. If corporate practice transferred disastrous viral infections to Chilean waters, then precedent and logic must conclude that these same corporations and operations could bring similar problems to the West Coast. So the corporate defensive strategy has been to separate the events that have occurred elsewhere from those unfolding here.

In a global village interconnected by information sources, however, this strategy is transparently facile and obvious. Numerous independent Norwegian scientists, with long North Atlantic salmon farming experience, have repeatedly warned that the same problems occurring in open net-pen operations there are inevitable in BC. A conspicuous corporate strategy of separating the two situations only arouses suspicion – although evasion suggests guilt, suspicion itself is not incriminating.

Neither is it incriminating that the salmon farming industry always professes its absolute innocence, invariably denying any connection between its practices and any harm to BC’s wild salmon. Its defensive strategy is to argue that no condemning studies are ever conclusive – even though many sea lice studies have repeatedly confirmed harm. Despite the overwhelming weight of incriminating circumstantial evidence, its corporate response is to encourage further investigation – ad nauseam. Repeat definitive studies. Get more data. Quibble about details. Solicit contradictory opinions. “Me thinks,” as Hamlet said of his mother’s guilt, “she doth protest too much.”

No corporation engaged in a harmless practice needs a public relations company to polish an image, especially if that company is Hill and Knowlton, described as one of the world’s slickest “spin machines” ‹ the same one employed by tobacco companies to deny the cancerous effects of smoking, by Exxon to clean its reputation after its disastrous oil spill in Alaska, and by dictatorships to cover the blood and torture of abominable politics. Since the character of a reputable corporation speaks for itself, suspicion is automatically aroused when extreme measures are needed to improve a public image.

The last criteria for identifying a prime suspect is means – did the suspect have the capability of committing the crime? Open net-pens containing millions of salmon in feed-lot conditions undeniably pollute the immediate benthic environment with feces, waste food, antibiotics and the toxins to control sea lice. And the natural sea lice cycle, sustained every year by the migration of wild mature salmon to spawning and death in their nascent rivers, is broken by the continual presence of salmon in farms. The consequent damage to out-migrating wild smolts has been repeatedly demonstrated.

The latest and most serious evidence in the sockeye salmon murder mystery is the possibility that corporations have brought lethal or debilitating viral infections to the West Coast. Symptoms of infectious salmon anemia have been found. And Dr. Kristi Miller, a molecular geneticist who has been studying the decline of Fraser River sockeye – their diminishing returns happen to correspond to the placement of open net-pen salmon farms on their migration routes – has identified genetic markers that strongly suggest another unusual viral infection in wild fish. “It could be the smoking gun,” she testified to the Cohen Commission established to investigate the mystery of the missing sockeye.

Judge Cohen has been receiving mounds of information, including reams of data about parasitic sea lice transferring from farmed to wild fish, and now new evidence suggesting fish farms have imported debilitating viruses to the BC’s West Coast ecology. When his investigation is completed, he will deliberate and report on his findings. The prime suspect has not yet been convicted. But the mounting evidence is incriminating, and various accomplices are now implicated. The plot thickens.

Share

Mark Hume on Cohen, DFO’s conflicting mandate to protect wild salmon while promoting aquaculture

Share

Read Mark Hume’s take in the Globe and Mail on yesterday’s pivotal session at the Cohen Commission into disappearing Fraser sockeye.

“Brock Martland, associate commission counsel, set the stage for a
free-wheeling debate when he opened with ‘a big question,’ asking the
panel if they thought DFO could successfully both regulate and promote
the aquaculture industry, while protecting wild salmon stocks. ‘I
don’t believe that’s possible … those two [mandates] are in conflict,’
shot back Ms. Stewart, who believes the industry damages wild salmon by
spreading sea lice and disease. She said the regulation of fish
farms should be handed off to some other federal agency, such as
Agriculture Canada or Industry Canada, while DFO should be charged with
managing and protecting wild salmon.” (Sept 7, 2011)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/cohen-inquiry-debates-dfos-ability-to-regulate-and-promote-salmon/article2157383/?from=sec431

Share

Morton Defiantly Stands her Ground at Cohen Commission

Share

Read this report from Black Press’ Jeff Nagel on the first of two days for Alexandra Morton on the stand at the Cohen Commission into disappearing Fraser sockeye.

“Morton said returning Fraser sockeye began to nose-dive in 1992, the
same year many salmon farms began operations on the migration route. ‘In the biological world, you rarely get patterns this bold,’ she said. She also noted Harrison Lake sockeye are an anomaly
among Fraser River runs in that they have bucked the downward trend and
done surprisingly well. That run migrates around the west side of Vancouver
Island, avoiding the main cluster of salmon farms on the east side, she
said.”

http://www.bclocalnews.com/vancouver_island_north/campbellrivermirror/news/129430898.html

Share
Alexandra Morton and her lawyer Greg McDade - pictured here during their landmark legal case regarding the regulation of aquaculture in 2009

Title Fight at Cohen Commission: Morton vs. Industry-Government Juggernaut

Share

Yesterday, on the penultimate day of the Cohen Commission’s hearings on aquaculture and diseases, Alexandra Morton finally took the stand. To say the event lived up to its billing is an understatement, as the Inquiry often characterized by technocratic tedium was jolted to life in its final rounds.

At the heart of the conflict lay the pattern of breathtaking industry-government collusion and secrecy that has characterized the aquaculture issue for decades – to a degree even I didn’t fully fathom until now.

Joining Morton and Living Oceans Society’s Catherine Stewart (who acquitted herself admirably) on the stand were two industry reps: Clare Backman, Director of Sustainability for Marine Harvest (now there’s an oxymoron), and Mia Parker, formerly of Grieg Seafoods, but now of DFO.

The Commission’s lawyer introduced Ms. Parker saying, “I’m not asking you to wear your DFO hat today, as that would be confusing.”

It’s actually simpler than it sounds. It’s called a conflict of interest.

And yet, charting this pair’s career paths does require a modicum of concentration, lest one gets lost in the whirlwind of the industry-government revolving door.

You see, Backman used to work for the Province, back when it had jurisdiction over aquaculture. More specifically, he was instrumental in selecting sites for fish farms on the coast. Then, in 2002, he went to work for the industry, ending up at Marine Harvest. Parker, on the other hand, worked for the industry up until recently, whereupon she transferred to government – specifically, designing aquaculture regulations under the new management regime of DFO (Morton and her lawyer Greg McDade forced this change of jurisdiction in 2009 with a landmark legal victory at the BC Supreme Court).

The problematic nature of this arrangement – from the public’s perspective – was evident when McDade, representing Morton at the Inquiry as well, asked Backman to commit to a higher level of fish health data reporting. Backman responded, “We’ll comply with whatever the license requirements are.”

Those would be the license requirements Ms. Parker is now helping to author. Are you with me so far?

In another telling exchange, we heard about a disease referred to as marine anemia, or plasmacytoid leukemia, that was ravaging Chinook farms in the late 80s and early 90s – a pathogen that apparently can jump from farmed Chinook to wild sockeye. This disease was one of Dr. Kritsti Miller’s prime suspects for the mystery virus afflicting millions of Fraser River sockeye with pre-spawn mortality – that which she conceded may hold the answer to the whole mystery the Commission is seeking to solve.

When Morton’s lawyer Greg McDade attempted to enter a summary by his client on the subject into the record, he was met by an instant chorus of objections from counsel for the Federal Government, the Province and the aquaculture industry, respectively. I observed no less than eight objections between them within minutes.

At one point, McDade fired back, “I don’t know why counsel for the Province is trying so hard to keep this evidence from being presented.” By this point, I’d wager most members of the audience could venture a hypothesis or two on that subject.

In the end, Justice Cohen tabled the matter for a later date – indicating he wanted to read this summary document before reaching a final decision on its inclusion in the Inquiry’s public record. However, that didn’t stop McDade from going through several key pages with Morton on the record, expanding on some matters I covered in detail in last week’s column – such as the correlation between the timing of locating these farms on the Fraser sockeye migratory route, circa 1992, and the productivity of said wild fish falling of a cliff.

Of particular note were the Province’s fish health audit records, recently made public for the first time through the Commission (this after counsel for the Campbell/Clark Government initially argued against disclosing them, before finally backing down early last week). McDade zeroed in on one specific data set, which showed that on a particular Chinook farm located in the pathway of migrating juvenile Fraser sockeye in the Discovery Islands area near Campbell River, 23 out of 24 fish sampled bore symptoms of marine anemia.

And yet, somehow no disease outbreak, or “fish health incident”, as it is referred to, was publicly reported or investigated further.

And why not? Because the decision of whether to report it rests in the hands of the fish farm company’s own veterinarians – as this exchange demonstrated:

McDade: So if your farm vets don’t make a diagnosis, it doesn’t get reported.

Long pause

Backman: That’s correct – because in their opinion it doesn’t exist.

McDade: So if 23 out of 24 of these fish die of those symptoms, it doesn’t exist.

You got that right. The disease doesn’t exist unless the industry says it does!

Backman’s rationale, amid courtroom gasps: “Yes, it’s important it gets into the public domain, but it’s also important it doesn’t get taken out of context.” In other words, best err to the side of secrecy and the industry’s interests.

If you’re concerned by what you’re now reading, consider what the Commission heard about the PhD thesis of a recent expert on the stand at the Commission, Dr. Craig Stephen, of the University of Calgary (a PhD student at the University of Saskatchewan at the time of the paper). In 1995, Stephen wrote: “Evidence supporting the hypothesis that marine anemia is a spreading, infectious neoplastic disease could have profound regulatory effects on the salmon farming industry.”

On the stand at the Commission years later (two weeks ago), Dr. Stephen would second-guess his own conclusions. And he’s not alone.

Another expert scientist, Dr. Michael Kent, before the Commissioner’s very eyes, backtracked on no less than 10 papers he’d published on marine anemia in journals over a decade.

Is it possible these scientists would rather disavow years of their own research than concede this disease in farmed fish could be related to the mystery virus Dr. Miller is pursuing? A virus which may in turn be “the smoking gun” for collapsing Fraser sockeye runs, as Miller recently told the Commission? If so, talk about taking one for the team!

Morton suggested that in light of Dr. Kent’s astonishing reversal on his own oft-published research, he should be going back to all those publications and retracting said articles – a reasonable request, given Dr. Kent’s own testimony on the stand (testimony which included him suggesting at one point that ocular tumours sent to the Smithsonian cancer registry may have been nothing more than some misdiagnosed inflammation that he really didn’t examine all that closely at the time).

And yet, it was somehow Ms. Morton’s credibility that was on trial on this day – as Canada’s counsel suggested her summary of this disease story was “full of hearsay and speculation”, while the industry’s lawyer impugned her professional conduct, going as far as to accuse her of breaching her code of ethics as a Registered Professional Biologist. Through it all, Morton bravely, calmly stood her ground.

Under the hail of objections as Greg McDade attempted to get Morton’s summary document on the record, his client boiled it all down to one salient point for the Commissioner: “The only thing I want you to take from this is that Dr. Miller needs to be able to do her work – someone who is an expert in disease needs to be free to look at this.” (The Commission also heard of the enormous obstacles Miller’s research is facing at its most critical juncture, including having her funding pulled – through political interference by the Harper Government).

The fact is, throughout the aquaculture and disease hearings of the past several weeks, most of the Commission’s scientific experts either work for or have worked for the industry or government – a point Morton made clear in the final, heated exchange of the day.

The lawyer for the Aboriginal Aquaculture Coalition (i.e., representing First Nations with a working partnership with the industry) asked Ms. Morton why her perspective differs so greatly from the phalanx of industry and government scientists who have one by one maintained salmon farms have nothing to do with the plight of Fraser sockeye. Morton remained cool under fire, replying that unlike all of them, “I don’t work for a university, the government, the industry, or a First Nation – I’m completely independent.”

The lawyer, Stephen Kelliher, shot back, with a heavy dose of sarcasm: “So you’re pure, then. You’re the only one who isn’t corrupted?” Morton simply smiled and replied, “Perhaps,” as the increasingly raucous gallery erupted in cheers.

And that was the kind of day it was at the Cohen Commission. A fitting emotional climax to what was easily the most exciting and revealing – while also frustrating and appalling – day of the Inquiry. The same panel, including Morton, returns to the stand today for the Commission’s final public session before closing arguments in November.

One day left and it feels like we’re only just now really getting somewhere.

Share

Alex Morton Blog: Today I am on the Stand

Share

Read this blog from Alexandra Morton as she prepares to take the stand at the Cohen Commission into disappearing sockeye.

“I can see how the Fraser sockeye got where they are today. I want to
know if Salmon Leukemia is infecting the Fraser sockeye. I want to know
why only the runs that pass salmon farms are collapsing and rebounding
in unpredictable patterns. I don’t see DFO accepting this
responsibility. Dr Mike Kent – ex-DFO retracted ten years of his own
work on this disease when he was on the stand. Then Dr Mark Sheppard,
DFO said he does not think it exists and will never report it even when
presented the clinical diagnosis. Dr. Marty BCMAL also does not think
it exists even though he has reported the symptoms in 587 farm salmon.
Dr. Saksida was on the stand yesterday she says it does exist. Dr.
Miller, DFO is trying to confirm all this and DFO has taken away her
funding to work on sockeye!!”

http://alexandramorton.typepad.com/alexandra_morton/2011/09/today-i-am-on-the-stand.html

Share

Times-Colonist: Infectious Salmon Anemia Here in BC!

Share

Read this astonishing editorial by DC Reid in the Times-Colonist, suggesting recently release fish farm disease records show deadly Infectious Salmon Anemia has reached the Pacific Coast of Canada.

“The worst possible thing that could happen to Pacific salmon has
happened: Norwegian, Atlantic Ocean ISA virus that has wiped out every
fish farm country in the world has been brought to the Pacific Ocean
where there was no ISA – until it was brought to Chile and now B.C. There
is only one solution: Get fish farms out of the water immediately and
onto land where they can infect nothing other than themselves. The best
data are the province’s. After seeking to keep them secret, Christy
Clark’s government relented. See: www.catchsalmonbc.com.

You will be staggered by how many hundreds of times HEM (interstitial
haemorrhage) and SSC (sinusoidal congestion) were found in fish farm
Atlantic salmon. These are the classic symptoms of ISA that wiped out
500 farms in Chile, resulting in a $2-billion loss. ISA in Norway is so
entrenched it has never been completely wiped out. Scotland looks on the
edge of a disease meltdown. And over the last six months Chilean farms
sequenced for ISA have grown to 23, suggesting another cyclic infectious
disaster soon.”

Share

Alexandra Morton on Fish Farmers’ Charge of “Unwanted Trespass”

Share

Read this blog by Alexandra Morton on another recent development at the Cohen Commission – the charge that she and others observing fish farms up close are somehow trespassing in open waters.

“How dare these Norwegian corporations suggest ‘unwanted trespass’!!!! If
we do not stand up to this now, they will erode our freedoms until we
are all serfs of the corporations. The ocean waters of Canada are not
the private property of anyone! The chiefs of the Broughton have given
me their blessing to travel freely through their territories. I rarely
get angry anymore – it takes too much energy to stay in this fight – but
this is so fundamentally wrong it needs strong opposition.” (Sept. 5, 2011)

http://alexandramorton.typepad.com/alexandra_morton/2011/09/unwanted-tresspass.html

Share

Precautionary Principle Missing in Protecting Wild Salmon

Share

Alexandra Morton and her small team have had the daunting task of searching through 500,000 documents for the Cohen Commission into disappearing Fraser sockeye – most of which had only been released after the Provincial Government and salmon farmers did everything possible to keep them secret.
 
This government, of all governments, tried to say that releasing the disease audits of the farms would betray privacy and I’m sure they were right – the privacy of the government departments and Norwegian fish farm companies that should have made these documents available long ago. Many of these documents may implicate fish farms in the loss of sockeye and were from the days when the provincial government carried that portfolio.
 
I’m sure this question has occurred to you: What right have the governments to withhold documents from the public they are elected to serve? Where the hell was Premier Photo-Op? Why didn’t she simply order that these be released (that is, before she felt compelled to do an about face at the last minute, under pressure from the media covering the Inquiry)? Same question for Prime Minister Harper who, after all, set up the Cohen Commission.
 
The answer is that the entire question has been and I suspect continues to be one massive government cover-up.
 
The federal government has made it impossible for the Department of Fisheries and Oceans to do their job because that job conflicts with another they hold – they are mandated to look after our wild salmon while at the same time pushing aquaculture (including fish farms) for all they’re worth. Fisheries ministers attend Fish Farm conventions trying to induce fish farmers to come to our coast while their scientists are supposed to be protecting wild salmon from the ravaging lice from fish cages, and, even worse, deadly disease!
 
There is a bigger picture here and I hope this is a nettle Commissioner Cohen grasps – the precautionary principle, which simply states, “if an action or policy has a suspected risk of causing harm to the public or to the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus that the action or policy is harmful, the burden of proof that it is not harmful falls on those taking the action.”
 
This is a huge matter, for the onus of proving the unsafeness of fish farms does not rest upon Alexandra Morton; rather, the onus of proving its safeness rests upon industry and the government departments in question which have massively failed that basic obligation entrusted to them.
 
This isn’t some niggling matter. Fish farmers, without that onus, are scarcely going to cooperate, nor will governments who are supposed to hold their feet to the fire. It has rested upon those who, by far, can least afford it to find out the truth.
 
I’ve watched this develop from the very time the tireless lady from the Broughton Archipelago began her fight nearly a decade ago. She has been impeded by government the entire way and was even threatened with jail by the DFO. Every step was blocked; every truth she put forward was met with lies.
 
Scientific proof of the danger to wild salmon from fish cages was denied in the name of science that didn’t exist or was so faulty as to call into question the researcher’s integrity. How Alex has put up with this massive cover-up is beyond me and those who have been at her side.
 
In a long life I have never seen courage as I’ve seen in Alexandra Morton.
 
The plain fact of the matter is that DFO and the BC Ministry of Agriculture and Lands have wrongfully abused their mandate by refusing to force the industry to demonstrate the safety of their corrosive intervention into the environment and we must all shudder to think what would have happened if a very brave, knowledgeable and, thank God, stubborn woman had not fallen in love with BC and vowed to protect it from the most powerful interests in the world – rapacious industry protected by corrupt government.

Alexandra Morton takes the stand at the Cohen Commission this Wednesday and Thursday (Sept 7-8) – the hearing will be live streamed on Rabble.ca.

Share

Vancouver Sun: Province Changes Mind, Agrees Salmon Farm Audits Should be Public

Share

Read this story from the Vancouver Sun’s Cohen Commission reporter, Gordon Hoekstra, on the Province’s u-turn from opposing the release of salmon farm audit records.

“The environmental groups, including the Pacific Coast Wild Salmon
Society and the Raincoast Research Society, had argued the audit
information was important to make public because it would give more
insight into what types of diseases are occurring at salmon farms. Symptoms
of salmon diseases like marine anemia, sometimes called a leukemia, are
described in the audit data, environmentalist and commission
participant Alexandra Morton said Tuesday during a break in the inquiry.” (Aug 31, 2011)

http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Province+allows+release+salmon+audits/5332306/story.html#ixzz1WcNOeHOy

Share
This graph, presented to the Cohen Commission, demonstrates how the introduction of salmon farms on the Fraser sockeye migratory route lines up with the collapse of thos wild stocks

Morton Sees Answer to Fraser Sockeye Collapse…And She’s Finally Free to Share It

Share

In a blog posting yesterday, following a series of major developments at the Cohen Commission, biologist Alexandra Morton suggests she now has enough pieces of the puzzle to pin much of the blame for collapsing Fraser sockeye stocks on salmon farms.

Morton and her team have reviewed over 500,000 documents submitted to the Cohen Commission into disappearing Fraser sockeye over the past year and she would have presented her conclusions to the public sooner, were it not for a confidentiality undertaking she and other Inquiry participants were forced to sign. But as of this week, much of the key evidence upon which Morton is basing her allegations has been officially entered into the record at the Commission and is thus now public.

The final piece fell into place when counsel representing the Clark Government backed down from its opposition to allowing a batch of fish farm disease databases from being entered into the record. The Province’s lawyer had made the argument that concealing information from the public was somehow actually in the public interest. But Monday, following a wave of public protest and negative media, Premier Christy Clark backed down and the records became public.

Morton writes in her blog, “In 1992, the salmon farms were placed on the Fraser sockeye migration route, and the Fraser sockeye went into steep decline…The only sockeye runs that declined were the ones that migrate through water used by salmon farms.” (emphasis added)

For instance, the Harrison sockeye run, which migrates out to sea via the Strait of Juan de Fuca – around the Southern tip of Vancouver Island, thus avoiding all the fish farms – is the one Fraser run that has been experiencing above average returns throughout the past two decades, while all other stocks have plummeted.

As Fraser sockeye nosedived throughout the 1990s and 2000s, DFO apparently became so concerned it asked Dr. Kristi Miller – head of Molecular Genetics at the Department’s Pacific Biological Station in Nanaimo – to investigate. Miller applied revolutionary genomics research to the mystery and came up with some startling findings  – the subject of great curiosity of late amongst the media and public, heightened by the Harper Government’s refusal to let her speak publicly about her work.

Miller discovered a “genomic signature” (a sort of genetic fingerprint) in sockeye that were dying in the river before they had a chance to spawn. Upon closer study of the fish and their symptoms, she concluded whatever disease was killing them and leaving its signature was strikingly similar to a virus that was ravaging farmed Chinook salmon in the late 80s and early 90s. This disease was being studied by one Dr. Michael Kent, who appeared as an expert scientist at the Cohen Commission last week just prior to Dr. Miller.

Kent labelled this mystery disease “Plasmycytoid Leukemia” at the time, while the fish farm industry called it “marine anemia”. Recently, Kent has been backing away from his work on the subject, which has complicated things for Miller.

But several key things jump out of this newly public data for Morton – the first being the fact these Chinook farms were located on the narrow Fraser sockeye migratory route through a maze of islands near Campbell River.

Another key issue is timing. In 2008 (the out-migration year for the phenomenal 2010 Fraser sockeye returns), the industry pulled all its Chinook farms along this corridor as it learned of Dr. Miller’s progressing research. Of course, we know those stocks rebounded dramatically. But in 2007, while the disastrous runs that would return in 2009 were swimming past these then-active farms, this mystery disease was peaking.

The Inquiry heard this week that research by the BC Ministry of Agriculture and Lands (the Provincial body with jurisdiction over fish farms at the time), was finding the disease in farmed fish. Morton writes:

What Miller did not know came out today and this is why I think salmon farms are killing the Fraser sockeye.

Four times a year the Province of BC goes out to the salmon farms, picks up approximately five dead farm salmon and does autopsies on them. There are approximately 600,000 farm salmon/farm so this is a very small sample.

While the BCMAL vet apparently does not “believe” in marine anemia, he frequently records the symptoms of this disease in the provincial farm salmon disease database he even notes:

“In Chinook salmon, this lesion is often associated with the clinical diagnosis of “Marine anemia”.

According to Dr. Kent’s studies, this Plasmacytoid Leukemia/marine anemia virus affects farmed Chinook much more so than farmed Atlantics. He did, however, find it can infect wild sockeye.

Morton writes, “Most important to us Kent found it could spread to sockeye. And DFO did nothing. The salmon farms remained on the Fraser sockeye migration route.”

But in addition to this disease, Morton believes another virus, Infectious Salmon Anemia, has also been wearing down Fraser sockeye (unlike marine anemia, farmed Atlantic salmon are highly susceptible to ISAv):

While the province of BC, the salmon farming industry, the Minister of Fisheries, MPs etc., have all been saying infectious salmon anemia is not here the province of BC has recorded the symptoms of this disease over 1,100 times in their database which only a very few people have ever seen. Disturbingly, ISAv symptoms are spiking just after marine anemia symptoms in three different years. Marine anemia is an immune suppressor. This graph looks only data from salmon farms on the Fraser sockeye migration route. The dates 2009, 2010, 2011 refer to the dates those sockeye returns went to sea. For example the sockeye that crashed in 2009, went to sea in the spring of 2007.

The adjacent graph depicts a scary double-barrel viral assault on Fraser sockeye that Morton believes – combined with other stresses in the marine environment that can compound the effects of diseases – is the key to solving the mystery of collapsing Fraser sockeye.

It remains to be seen how Morton’s hypothesis and this flood of new, publicly available data impacts the final months of the Cohen Commission – or public opinion on salmon farms. The Inquiry also learned last week of the lengths Dr. Miller’s own DFO colleagues, the aquaculture lobby, and even the Harper Privy Council Office have gone to to keep Miller from pursuing and publicly discussing her groundbreaking work. Miller even told the Commission – to muffled gasps throughout the court room – that the future funding of her work is in serious question, thanks to policy changes from the Harper Budget Office.

But in light of the seriousness of these allegations and starkness of some of this data now coming to light for the first time, it’s clear that if we have any genuine desire to stem the decline of Fraser sockeye, these diseases need to be taken seriously and studied further with all the necessary resources and departmental and political support they merit.

If the Cohen Commission cannot deliver at least that much, then it will have failed its most basic objective.

Share