From The Ecologist – March 29, 2011

by Will McLennan

An attempt to classify tar sands oil as more
environmentally-damaging than conventional oil would effectively ban its
sale within European Member States

The European Union is moving to prevent tar sands oil from entering
the European market due to the greenhouse gas emissions (GHG)
associated with its production.

Oil from the tar sands industry
is set to be classified as having greater GHG emissions than
conventional oil in a review of the European Union’s Fuel Quality
Directive. Recognising the greater environmental impact of tar sands oil
will effectively ban its use in EU states, where fuel providers are
legally bound to aim for 6 per cent reductions in GHG emissions by 2020.

Tar
sands are deposits of oil-rich bitumen mixed with clay and sand
embedded in rocks often buried beneath the surface. Two tonnes of
topsoil have to be removed to produce each barrel of bitumen, creating
vast open mines. Extracting the deposits is estimated to be three times more carbon-intensive than conventional oil sources.
It also causes the loss of natural habitats with vast areas of boreal
forest cleared in order to mine the sandy bitumen – and pollution of
local waterways with toxic chemicals.

The largest reserves of tar sands in the world are held in Canada, which plans to increase production from 1.5 million to 7 million barrels a day by 2020. Both Shell and BP
are major investors in tar sands with BP having acquired a 50 per cent
stake in the Sunrise Project, a tar sands extraction site near Alberta.

The
EU had previously dropped the attempt to classify tar sands oil as more
environmentally-damaging than conventional oil after strong lobbying by
the Canadian government and the oil industry. However, following a
year-long campaign by a coalition of environmental groups led by the
Co-operative and including WWF, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth and
Transport & Environment, it is now being reconsidered. Campaigners
hope changing tar sand’s status in the Fuel Quality Directive will halt
the tar sands expansion.

Canada had argued the move would create a
trade barrier, however, European politicians believe by changing tar
sand’s status the EU is putting the onus on fuel suppliers to reduce
their emissions.

‘Nothing that we do will stop people importing
tar sands, it will simply label tar sands accurately, so people who are
under a legal obligation to reduce their carbon footprint are more
likely to chose cleaner fuels,’ said Linda McAvan, Labour MEP, who
helped bring this issue to the European Commission’s attention.

The
Co-operative led alliance will now be engaging with EU member states,
to counterbalance any pressure being applied by the Canadian government
and oil industry, and guarantee the new value for tar sands oil is
included in the revised Fuel Quality Directive.

‘This is a clear
signal to oil companies and investors that tar sands expansion is a
risky business, as Europe is a global leader in environmental standards,
it will likely lead to similar standards being adopted elsewhere around
the world,’ said Colin Baines, toxic fuels campaign manager at the
Co-operative. ‘The oil industry should think twice about investing
billions of dollars in expanding tar sands developments. They could end
up producing a fuel that nobody wants.’

Read original article