Category Archives: WATER

Federal & Provincial Elections: Crucial Choices for BC’s Future

Share

The Common Sense Canadian is not a supporter of any political party but deals in issues and essentially we concentrate on the linked issues of the environment and energy matters.

The rationale for the Common Sense Canadian’s policy is this: every political party has the “cure” for all our social needs and each of them declares that it and only it has the ability to make the right moves to bring the actual result for what is demanded. But we have reached a crossroads – a true moment of truth.

There is surely one lesson we have learned: no matter how bad the opposition says the government is, the fiscal damage is reparable. Moreover, we ought also to have learned that each incoming government says that the situation was worse than they thought yet somehow they don’t turn out to be much of an improvement.

There is a huge difference in the messages. The Provincial Liberals, following the Socred line, tell us that the NDP left the treasury empty and ruined the economy. They make no allowances for what was known as the “Asian Flu” that so damaged BC’s export business. The fact that the NDP balanced their last year’s budget and that Premier Campbell thus saw fit to give better off people an instant billion dollar-plus tax break seems lost in the rhetoric that is politics.

I think that the case can be made that the Campbell government missed the clear signs of a recession which were there to be seen and simply didn’t tell the truth about that, and, of course, the HST.

The 1991-2001 NDP left a lot to be desired, especially in the leadership department – with four premiers in that period – and were so incapable of keeping the ship steady they were forced to bring outsiders into cabinet.

It’s not my purpose to defend or vilify either party but simply to make the point that no government has a monopoly on stupidity and no government has really wrestled the problems of health care, education, welfare and unemployment to the ground and none are likely to.

In the many years I’ve been involved in political life this is the first time I’ve seen a situation which, if not changed, will permanently leave longstanding wounds – wounds which will get worse and be incurable to boot. One of these is of a visual nature which goes to the very root of what British Columbia really is; that goes to the very root of how we keep being prosperous or at least give stability to our province in economic terms. These issues are intertwined.

The first is the environment. Virtually all mankind has played havoc with the environment but that’s surely no excuse for us to falter. We don’t have to destroy our forests to make a living. We have no need to jeopardize, indeed kill off our wild salmon so that people other than British Columbians can provide dividends for their shareholders.

We have no need to sacrifice our rivers so, once again, outsiders can profit from the electricity produced.

The second is BC Hydro, the main gem in the provincial crown. WAC Bennett saw three areas where the people, through those they elect, could use crown corporations for good policy decisions.

Bennett knew that no private ferry system would keep unprofitable routes yet he also knew that all British Columbians must have decent, affordable transportation options, so he bought Black Ball Ferries and created BC Ferries – which Gordon Campbell privatized. It left us the worst of all results – BC no longer directs its affairs but must still subsidize it.

Bennett knew that BC, large and bountiful as it is, needed a rail system that would lose money on some runs in order to open the province up and thus should be owned by the people and again a vehicle for public policy. Campbell gave this away to the private sector which won’t tolerate losing lines.

Bennett also knew that for British Columbians to compete and prosper it must have certainty of power both at home and in industry, so he bought out BC Electric Railway and created BC Hydro. This company was a huge success yet Campbell has developed a private power scheme leaving BC Hydro in a position that, if it couldn’t go on raising rates to subsidize its mandated giveaway program, would be bankrupt. It will be sold by way of bankruptcy, a bankruptcy which is clear on the horizon.

We must surely re-evaluate our political priorities. If the sale or disposition of our public assets would bring us prosperity thus making us better able to meet social obligations that would be one thing. But the fact is that each of these privatizing schemes hurts our economy badly.

For the first time in our history we have embarked on a program to destroy our environment and our ability to make our own rules about transport and power – and we have done this for the immense enrichment of others.

For the first time we have policies in place that will deliberately destroy the environment for private energy we can’t use, the profits from which go to large out of province corporations.

I believe that the last chance we’ll have to save the situation is in the forthcoming federal election and the provincial election most likely to occur this Fall, if not sooner.

This means, in my view, we must make a stark decision: are we, in exchange for the usual promises about health care, education, and welfare, going to put back into government those who are destroying our environment and giving away our power?

To this must be added that both the Federal Conservatives and the provincial Liberals have lied through their teeth in doing their destructive deeds.

The federal Conservatives are as much to blame as the Campbell/Clark bunch. One need only look at what’s coming out of the Cohen Commission to see how the destruction of our salmon by fish farms is not an accident but a very careful and deliberate policy. Moreover the feds have actually been financing the Independent Power Producers with our tax money! Can you beat this? Your tax dollars are going to help General Electric destroy our rivers and our power system!

In one line I want to dispose of the notion that we need majority governments: can you imagine what the Harper government would have done if they had a majority?

At The Common Sense Canadian we will support candidates who will end the giveaways and recover that which can be recovered, knowing that painful though the decision may be to many of us, our environment and energy will continue to be stolen from us, with one of the clear consequences that we have even less money to look after our hospitals, schools, universities and those who need help.  

Share

Shades of Green: Fukushima Daiichi and Decision Time

Share

The unfolding events at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan are more than a human and environmental disaster. The cooling problem and subsequent radiation leaks that are contaminating food, land and water are tragic reminders of the dilemma facing a growing world population that is demanding increasing amounts of energy to fuel higher levels of production and consumption. The rising complexity of technology, the looming shortage of resources and the physical limits imposed by a finite planet all compound this dilemma. Indeed, Fukushima Daiichi is a symbol of the fragile successes and the menacing failings of our sophisticated age. Thus Japan is providing a glimpse into the future of every modern society everywhere.

Just as modern Japan arose by embracing industrialization at the end of the Tokugawa Period, it also arose from the ruin of World War II by embracing technology. And the Japanese success has been stupendous. Within a few decades of the wreckage of 1945, it had become the second largest economy on the planet – it is now third, after recently being overtaken by China. The world is full of Japanese technology, innovation and products: electronics, computers, digitization, cars, ships and robotics. Its manufacturing, buying and consumption habits affect the economy of the world.

Although modern Japan has a people who are dedicated and industrious, it doesn’t have the local natural resources to empower this capability. So it imports vast quantities of raw materials and exports them as finished products. And it has solved its energy problem by adopting nuclear power, the same kind of technological sophistication that has brought it other successes.

Japan is the third largest user of nuclear energy in the world. Its 55 nuclear reactors are clean, efficient and perfectly tailored to the compact, dense and vigorous character of the country. The reactors are also an ideal match for the profligate use of energy that powers Japan’s industry, cities, trains, entertainment and communication systems. Indeed, Japan’s social, cultural and economic vitality seems to be more closely connected to massive quantities of electricity than almost any country in the world. The humming activity of Japan is synonymous with the humming current coursing through its ubiquitous power lines.

The choice Japan made decades ago to adopt nuclear power as the solution to its energy needs is now a choice confronting the rest of the world. The other options seem fraught with shortcomings. Coal, although plentiful, is polluting, and its high carbon dioxide output makes it the worst possible energy source on a planet subject to the looming effects of greenhouse warming. Most of the world’s hydro-electric potential has already been harnessed. Oil is almost as dirty as coal, and its supply is on the verge of falling below demand. Renewable energies such as wind, solar, tidal and geothermal may not be able to meet the growing needs of industrialization, consumption and population. Conservation and efficiency, although helpful, can’t seem to compensate for rising energy use. At the time and under the circumstances, Japan’s decision to go nuclear seemed a smart strategy.

But the twin traumas of a massive earthquake and a huge tsunami have changed this calculus. The near-meltdown at Three Mile Island in 1979 and the explosion at Chernobyl in 1986 come flooding back as vivid, cautionary memories. Nuclear waste still remains an unsolved problem. Now the reactors at Fukushima Daiichi – Japan’s third nuclear disaster after Hiroshima and Nagasaki – are a reminder that the technology, regardless of the precautions and safeguards, is complex and unforgiving. Any human error, laxity or failed foresight can reap horrendous consequences. Are the risks worth the benefits?

The answer is not apparent in the changing economics of energy production. A new nuclear power plant takes 10 years and $6 billion to build – a cost that is rising rapidly as increasingly stringent safety measures have to be incorporated into designs. A comparable coal plant takes 3 years and $3 billion – coal is plentiful but dirty and sequestering its carbon is expensive and unproven. A gas plant can be built in 2 years at a cost of $1 billion – although shale gas is now being found in massive quantities, the “fracking” required to release it from rock may contaminate groundwater and aquifers, and it still produces about half the carbon dioxide of coal. The only wholly positive option is clean, renewable energy sources. Its efficiency is increasing and its cost is decreasing – but critics contend this technology is not yet remotely capable of meeting our huge energy needs. Conservation, too, is only a partial solution.

So this brings the subject back to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station. The unfolding disaster there is an existential moment, a crisis that is an opportunity for everyone on the planet to awaken to the energy dilemma facing us all. The Japanese have responded with heroic calm to the multiple calamities of earthquake, tsunami and radiation. Some workers have undoubtedly sacrificed their health and lives to keep Fukushima Daiichi from becoming another Chernobyl.

Although we are not required to be so brave, Fukushima Daiichi is a vivid reminder that the time has come for us to think very, very seriously about our own energy needs, lifestyles and priorities. Whether or not we have noticed, the unfolding events in Japan are an object lesson for us.

Share

Penticton Western News: Mair leads the charge on energy policy

Share

From the Penticton Western News – April 5, 2011

by Steve Kidder

Politics sometimes makes strange bedfellows, and it appears
environmental activism does as well. At least for former Social Credit
cabinet minister Rafe Mair, who found himself sharing the stage with
provincial Green Party and NDP candidates at the Shatford Centre
Saturday afternoon.

It’s not about the politics of it, said the always outspoken
columnist and talk show host. While Julius Bloomfield, deputy leader of
the provincial Green Party, was also speaking at the event, Mair said
they didn’t bring the Town Hall Tour to Penticton in order to support
the Greens, either provincially or federally. Rather, he just wanted to
get the message out about environmental and energy issues facing the
people of B.C.

“I am not supporting the Greens, I am supporting our own
organization, which is called The Common Sense Canadian,” said Mair. “We
have no political affiliations at all, but we do support candidates
that have the same views on the environment and energy as we do.”

Mair partnered with award-winning filmmaker
Damien Gillis to create the organization, which he explains focuses on
two related, major issues: B.C.’s energy policy and the environmental
impact of developments like run-of-the-river power projects and the
proposed Enbridge Pipeline.

Even if these things aren’t happening locally,
Mair said that all B.C. residents have a stake in what is going on, in
every corner of the province, and need to hold governments to task.

“The energy policy that was brought in by the
Campbell government is absolutely preposterous,” said Mair. “We got
private companies buggering up our rivers, making power that Hydro can’t
use — they can only make it during the spring runoff — and forcing
Hydro to buy that power whether they want to or not.”

That leads to an “absurd” situation, Mair said,
claiming that BC Hydro will have to buy the power at three times the
price they can export it for, instead of making it themselves at a tenth
of the cost that the independent power producers can.

“BC Hydro is bankrupt. It’s not bankrupt, because
it always has the ratepayers to call on to bring in the money, but if
they were in the private sector right now, it would be in Chapter 11
protection,” said Mair, adding that the environmental argument against
independent power projects is just as strong.

“These rivers are buggered up, there is no doubt
about it,” he said. “All the things that live in those rivers are at
serious risk. This is what the Campbell government has done to your
environment and your energy.”

Cameron Phillips, who ran locally for the
provincial NDP in 2009, said he had a hard time making run-of-the-river
projects an election issue during that election.

“This is a ballot box issue. What British
Columbian wants to give up the right to their rivers, to pour millions
of dollars into corporate pockets that would otherwise go into roads and
schools and everything else?” said Phillip.

Mair’s powerful skills as an orator carried the
crowd packed into the recital hall at the Shatford Centre, bringing them
to their feet after a speech, that though short on substantiated facts,
was filled with emotional impact, as was Gillis’ film, Oil in Eden, which was shown prior to the speeches from Mair, Bloomfield and Gillis himself.

Mair said he hopes voters will think about these issues as they question the candidates running for office.

“I hope they will take these thoughts to the
various political parties in the federal race,” he said, adding his
opinion that the current government isn’t doing enough.

“The minister of fisheries is an absolute
deadhead, there is no use talking to her about anything,” said Mair.
“It’s got to change, it really does.”

More information about The Common Sense Canadian is available at www.thecanadian.org.

Read original article

Share

Horgan Puts Private Power Industry on Notice

Share

EDITOR’S NOTE: Over the past several weeks, The Common Sense Canadian has published the energy positions of the BC First Party and NDP leadership hopeful Mike Farnworth. Now we are pleased to bring our readers a statement from NDP leadership candidate John Horgan.

—————————————————————————————————————————————–

Early on in my campaign to lead the BC NDP, I put independent power producers on notice that a John Horgan-led government will immediately put a moratorium on run of river power projects and conduct a review of existing power purchase agreements to determine if they are in the public interest. That might not make me many friends, but it’s the right thing to do.

The days of secret agreements that guarantee huge profits for private power operators at the expense of ordinary ratepayers will be over. The days of pet projects at the whim of politicians without any regard for the public interest will be over too. I would immediately move to restore the BC Utilities Commission to its rightful place as an independent oversight body that looks out for all British Columbians.

I was part of the Mike Harcourt administration that encouraged run of the river power projects – but only when it made sense. We had a plan that would see small communities served by true micro-hydro projects that would get them off diesel generators. Our plan required projects to be small in scale, without fish implications, and built for local energy needs.

But the BC Liberals saw the potential for their friends to make a buck (A LOT of bucks!), and the result of their ideologically driven agenda is what you see today – a crippled BC Hydro forced to jack rates by 50 per cent to keep up to rising costs from tens of billions of dollars in contractual obligations so their rich friends can get richer on the backs of British Columbians.

The reckless energy policies culminated last June when the government forced the so-called Clean Energy Act through the legislature with closure and no debate. Now our new “families first” premier has instructed her new energy minister to find a way to keep those rate hikes low because we’re heading into an election and she wants to appear the hero. That is just not good enough. The Clean Energy Act needs to be revisited and may need to be re-written completely, and I am committed to doing that as Premier of British Columbia.

As the BC NDP’s energy critic over the past five years, and an energy advisor to NDP governments in the 1990s before that, I recognize that energy issues are inextricably linked to environmental issues. That’s why I have embedded the two into my comprehensive environmental protection plan, and made that plan one of four key priorities of my campaign along with economic growth and social justice, education and training, and honest government.

My plan for the environment includes addressing climate change and creating a real green energy plan, protecting our environment including reinvesting in parks and the land base, providing real land and water stewardship, and protecting our ocean and coastline. I am committed to restoring the integrity and strength of our environmental assessment process that was groundbreaking when we introduced it in the 1990s, but has been seriously eroded under a decade of BC Liberal rule.

I will work with the environmental and business communities, working people, and experts to develop effective ways of reducing our carbon footprint, conserving energy, and protecting our natural environment. I also believe that we must create opportunities for young people to acquire skills necessary to build and compete in the new green economy. That includes replacing a plan to spend a billion dollars on smart meters with a plan to make a smart investment in home energy retrofits.

My environmental plan won praise from the Wilderness Committee when I was the first to release one. Gwen Barlee said, “Horgan’s environmental platform is far-reaching and comprehensive. It makes a commitment to a healthy environment and sets the bar for other leadership candidates to follow.” Noted environmental activist Vicky Husband recently told The Tyee, “[John Horgan has] shown a very strong environmental bent and sense of responsibility. If he becomes leader of the opposition, the environment will become a major issue.”

British Columbia is a commodity based economy that is transitioning to a new green economy. That transition will require us to both protect our environment and invest in green technology development and training to ensure British Columbians have the skills to take on the jobs of the future. Under my leadership, an NDP government will ensure that the natural legacy we inherited from those who came before us is protected for those who will come after us.

Share

Worm Turns for Private Power as NDP Leadership Hopefuls Get It

Share

The chickens are, at long last, coming home to roost! The Campbell Government’s Energy Policy, now Christy Clark’s, is being seen for what it is – an egregiously ideological giveaway to large corporations. Even that Liberal suck, the Vancouver Province calls the policy “folly”. Yes, after 8 years of silence, of indifference, the Province in one word describes a policy it has, by its silence condoned for nearly a decade – a policy they and the rest of the media could have likely stopped had they chosen to deal with it. Meanwhile, the Vancouver Sun, having a Fellow of the Fraser Institute, Fazil Milhar as editor of the Editorial Page, has indeed by its silence kept the spotlight off this massive giveaway of our province.

The evil consequences of BC’s current energy policy, drafted in large part by Alcan in its move way from smelting aluminum into a big-time energy producer, are many.

As official spokesman for The Common Sense Canadian, I’ve spoken throughout the province and found one constant obstacle: people find it difficult to believe that any sane government could come up with such a policy. They’re starting to realize that they’re right – no sane government would:

  • Forbid BC Hydro from developing any new public power projects (Site C, exempted, is not a “new” project – it’s been on the books for decades)
  • Give all development to private companies with secret sweetheart deals
  • All but give them licenses to use our rivers (the original price for a private power water license was around $170)
  • Force BC Hydro to buy this private power at almost 3 times what they pay for it or some 9-12 more than they can make it themselves, thus placing BC Hydro in a position that if they were in the private sector, they would be headed for bankruptcy.

That’s right folks – these private power projects can’t store much energy, meaning it must be used when it’s created. Because they can’t generate much power when their rivers are low, which they generally are except during the annual spring run-off – when we need their power the least – BC Hydro gets stuck with power it must use or sell at a huge loss.

One cannot blame people for not believing this. It is indeed incomprehensible. But it’s true.

It’s so hard to believe that the NDP in the ’09 election didn’t make this into the big issue of the campaign.

The worm has turned – not implying that the NDP are worms! – and the leading candidates for their leadership have clearly stated that there will be no more of this sweetheart cronyism and that the secret contracts must be opened up to the public’s scrutiny.

You will recall that during the Liberal Party’s leadership process this environment/energy issue wasn’t debated at all. It was if it simply didn’t exist! Assuming that the NDP select either Mr. Farnworth or Mr. Horgan, this issue is automatically in the forefront of the debate and must be dealt with – as long as the NDP keeps its nerve.

On a related matter, John Cummins, leader of the Conservative Party, has long been an ardent foe of the Liberals’ Energy Policy and even if, which I don’t believe, the NDP were to lose their nerve, the Conservatives won’t. With no seats going into the race, and with Mr. Cummins’ reputation for fighting for what he believes in, the Liberals will finally be forced to face the music.

Finally, what will Mr. Campbell do now?

On the Liberal leader election night, Mr. Campbell was said to be in Washington, DC. This is not the time of year he normally takes a vacation there and it would be interesting to know what his itinerary was.

My guess is that some plumy directorships will be coming his way from grateful titans of industry.

Share

Environment unites B.C. NDP hopefuls at leadership debate

Share

From The Province – April 2, 2011

by Cassidy Olivier

They joked around about what kind of salmon they would be, drew big
laughs with their self-deprecating humour and elicited cheers from the
packed auditorium with their directed jabs at the governing Liberal
Party.

But the main message coming out of Saturday’s B.C. NDP
leadership debate on environmental sustainability in Vancouver was a
serious one: The province needs a government who makes the environment a
top priority. And that’s what they promised to do.

Like the
previous six leadership debates, the five candidates vying for the top
job differed little on the policy issues — ranging from water
stewardship to pollution taxes — raised at the Creekside Community
Centre in the former Olympic Village.

All agreed that the
province’s environmental assessment process needs beefing up, that
issues of ­poverty and sustainability are inextricably linked, that
damaging practices need to be stopped and that the controversial carbon
tax needs rejigging.

Similarly, all five said they were against
Site C, the proposed mega-dam on the Peace River, the cross-province
Enbridge Pipeline project and offshore drilling.

They also expressed a need to take a closer look at B.C. Hydro’s IPP contracts.

As
John Horgan, MLA for Juan de Fuca, put it in a line borrowed from
himself Thursday in Victoria: “It’s another love-in, as you can see.
There’s not a lot to divide the five of us with respect to policy or the
issues of the day.”

The differences, then, were found in the way
they performed and the themes they pushed forward as part of their
ultimate goal of convincing party members that they are the right choice
to lead New Democrats into the future, and the best bet of beating
Premier Christy Clark at the polls.

Vancouver-Kingsway MLA ­Adrian
Dix, one of three perceived front-runners, spoke passionately about the
need for environmental assessment legislation that was “worthy of its
name.”

He said the carbon tax shouldn’t be revenue neutral and promised a rollback on the tax to fund transportation and education.

Dix also tossed the most vitriol at B.C.’s new premier, saying in his closing remarks that he “couldn’t wait” to take her on.

Earlier,
he questioned Clark’s decision to lobby the federal government on the
proposed Prosperity Mine near Williams Lake, after the feds had said the
province’s environmental assessment had been inadequate.

“Stephen
Harper’s government said no. Then the new premier of B.C. demands that
the federal government overturns its decision,” said Dix.

“You got to be pretty far out on the political fringe to be on the right of Stephen Harper.”

Mike
Farnworth, MLA for Port Coquitlam and another perceived front-runner,
spoke frequently of unity — both in terms of uniting the province under a
shared vision and progressive voters who are desperate for change.

Farnworth
spoke of ­adequately funding the Ministry of Environment so that “they
can do what they are supposed to do” and of a government that looks at
sustainability, as it applies not only to the environment, but also
public policy.

“Our best days, our best public policy is when we
do what we do best which is bring the people together,” he said. “We
don’t divide the people, we bring them together.”

Horgan, who
appears to be making a late push and arguably drew the most laughs of
the day, said the Liberals aren’t adequately protecting the province’s
resources.

He said more science needs to be applied when making
decisions that have environmental impacts, and spoke of putting forward a
strong agenda based on sustainability that the voters are proud of.

Nicholas
Simons, MLA for Powell-River Sunshine Coast, also spoke of the need to
bring in experts and seek differing opinions when making policy
decisions.

In perhaps the most eloquent close of the afternoon,
Simons, a cellist, likened his role as leader to a conductor in an
orchestra.

Marijuana activist Dana Larsen said it was critical
that we move away from a carbon-based society to one that uses more
renewable energy such as hemp.

B.C. NDP members will vote for a new leader April 17.

Read original article

Share

Rafe Mair to speak in Penticton

Share

From the Penticton Western News – March 31, 2011

Former Social Credit cabinet minister and political commentator Rafe
Mair will be in Penticton Saturday as part of a provincewide series of
engagements called: A Town-hall Tour for Common Sense Canadians.

As a radio talk-show host throughout much of the
‘90s on Vancouver’s CKNW, Mair made a name for himself as a thoughtful,
witty and, at times, abrasive stewart of political discourse.

Two years ago, when he last spoke in Penticton,
Mair said that if the BC Liberal government continues on its “path of
disseminating BC Hydro”, the province’s residents will face huge price
hikes in our electrical bills.

Since then, according to Mair, “we now face, on average, 50 per cent hikes in our electrical bills.”

Once again, Mair will speak on issues affecting B.C.’s rivers, hydro bills, fish and democracy.

“These aren’t matters of left and right, but of
right and wrong,” said Mair. “It’s time for common sense Canadians to
band together through our own media and community organizing to address
our greatest challenges: protecting our environment and democracy.

“We can be the generation that lost B.C. or, together, we can be the one that saved it.”

The town hall meeting will also include former
provincial Green Party candidate Julius Bloomfield, an advocate for
alternative energies such as solar and wind, and filmmaker Damien
Gillis’ new short documentary on the proposed Enbridge Pipeline to
B.C.’s North Coast.

The event will take place Saturday at 2 p.m. at
the Shatford Centre (the old Pen High building across from the Penticton
Public Library).

Read original article

Share

BC Utilities Commission Suspends Hydro Rate Increase

Share

From The Province – March 31, 2011

By Cassidy Olivier

The B.C. Utilities Commission has suspended a proposal by B.C. Hydro
seeking an interim rate increase of almost 10 per cent starting April 1.

The
proposal is included in Hydro’s revenue application package for the
years 2012 to 2014, which will, if approved, see rates jump by 9.73 per
cent as part of the Crown corporation’s $6-billion upgrade plans.

The
BCUC, however, ruled late Monday the interim rate may be “too high”
given Hydro’s admission during the proceedings that the government’s
review of the proposed increases could result in lower rates.

Minister of Energy Rich Coleman is heading a review into Hydro, at the behest of new premier Christy Clark.

The
BCUC said in a written statement on its website that arguments for a
proposed interim-rate increase are not based on the best information
possible given the ongoing ministerial review.

As such, the increase was suspended pending further submissions by Hydro and other interested parties.

The issue will be revisited April 8.

Read original article

Share

Mair, Gillis bringing common sense to Kelowna April 3

Share

From the Kelowna Capital News – March 30, 2011

Rivers, hydro bills, oil tankers, democracy—these are the
subjects of a rousing tour of B.C. this year led by Rafe Mair and Damien
Gillis.

Gillis and Mair are founders of a new online
journal called The Common Sense Canadian, created to provide a voice for
the public and the environment.

As part of a speaking tour that reaches some 30
communities around the province, Mair and Gillis  will appear in Kelowna
on Sunday, April 3, 3 p.m., at First United Church in downtown Kelowna.

The event is co-sponsored by the Kelowna chapter of the Council of Canadians and Citizens for Public Power.

The townhall meeting will feature Gillis’ new
short documentary on the proposed Enbridge pipeline to B.C.’s North
Coast, called Oil In Eden, and a keynote speech by Mair, a former
provincial government cabinet minister under former premier Bill
Bennett’s Social Credit government and a now retired long-time Vancouver
radio talk show host.

The two will also take questions from the audience.

The tour is designed to inform and empower British Columbians.

“These aren’t matters of left and right, but of right and wrong,” Mair said.

“It’s time for Common Sense Canadians to band
together—through our own media and community organizing—to address our
greatest challenges: Protecting our environment and democracy.

“We can be the generation that lost B.C., or together we can be the one that saved it.”

Read original article

Share

B.C. to continue ‘fracking’ for gas, despite bans elsewhere

Share

From the Vancouver Sun – March 30, 2011

by Jeff Lee

British Columbia has no worries about the controversial use of
hydraulic fracturing in natural gas production, even though other
governments have recently instituted moratoriums on the process, Energy
and Mines Minister Rich Coleman said Tuesday.

Earlier this month
Quebec halted the use of so-called “fracking” technology, which involves
pumping large volumes of water, sand and chemicals into shale gas
deposits to fracture the rock and force the gas into collection pipes.
Several U.S. states, including New York, and France have also halted the
use of fracking over concerns that not enough is known about the
long-term effects of the extraction method.

A number of
jurisdictions have worried that the method may lead to the contamination
of groundwater supplies and there have been periodic complaints from
neighbours, including allegations of gas seeping from domestic water
taps.

But Coleman said B.C. gas extraction companies have been
using fracking for many years without problems and have to meet what he
termed “the world’s most stringent environmental regulations.”

“I’m
actually pretty comfortable with the maturity we have in this
particular field,” he said. “I have seen nothing to date that would tell
me that we are not out front on all the environmental issues compared
to other jurisdictions.”

Doug Bloom, the president of Spectra
Energy Transmission’s western division, says he doesn’t believe
“fracking” in B.C. is as much an environmental problem as it is one of
access to sufficient water supplies.

“We know it has become an
issue elsewhere, but frankly … fracking is not a new technology,” said
Bloom. “We’ve been fracturing wells in Western Canada for decades and to
my knowledge there haven’t been any problems associated with that.”

Spectra
Energy, a Fortune 500 company, has five natural gas-processing plants
in B.C. In North America it has more than 30,000 kilometres of
transmission lines and more than eight billion cubic metres of storage
capacity.

Natural gas is one of B.C.’s most valuable resources.
This year royalties from gas exploration will deliver nearly $1.4
billion into provincial coffers. Nearly a third of Canada’s entire
natural gas reserves are in B.C. But it comes with the use of technology
that some opponents and environmentalists say has yet to be proven.

The
Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives suggested in a recent paper the
long-term effects of fracking have yet to be understood.

And in
the Peace region, a group of residents called the Peace Environmental
and Safety Trustees Society has asked the province for a formal inquiry
into the health effects from sour gas wells.

But Bloom said the
use of fracking in B.C.’s northeast gas fields “has more to do more with
the water supply” than any long-term environmental concern.

“The
bigger issue in British Columbia is water use, what water supplies you
will use for fracking. Increasingly, what we’re seeing producers do is
recycle water so that they can reuse it and not use as much.”

He said Spectra isn’t concerned about the technology’s safety.

“We worry to the extent that the debate is informed and that it is science and fact-based.”

But not everyone is convinced that fracking is environmentally harmless.

John Walker, president of FortisBC, thinks B.C. will likely have to look at the impacts of the technology at some point.

“There
is a challenge. I think it is a challenge [of] how you manage this from
a regulatory point of view,” said Walker, whose company is the largest
natural gas distributor in Western Canada.

“You have to manage
the environmental impacts as you go forward and that is absolutely one
of the challenges that we have to work with.”

Bloom and Walker
were part of a Vancouver Board of Trade panel Tuesday that looked at the
benefits and business opportunities of natural gas in B.C. Both believe
natural gas production will lead to the continued development of new
forms of use, particularly in the area of transportation.

Fracking
has in recent years led to the revival of natural gas exploration
because it has solved a problem that has long vexed companies: how to
unlock gas trapped in shale deposits.

Ten years ago when B.C.
began to seriously expand gas exploration, it had a 10-year supply of
gas reserves, Coleman said. Now it has more than 100 years of proven
reserves in the northeastern part of the province, the Horn River and
Montney Basin deposits, and that doesn’t even include new reserves being
developed in the Liard, he said.

But that same technology has
also led to the development of numerous shale gas reserves elsewhere in
North America, with the result that the U.S. also has a 100-year supply.

As a result, gas prices have plummeted from a high of about $14 to $4 per gigajoule.

Walker,
who is not opposed to fracking, said the moratoriums against it in
other jurisdictions may have an impact on B.C.’s market.

“If you
curtail the use of fracking, there is no doubt that is the technology
and methodology that drove the ability to exploit these shales.

“I think we are going to have to find a way to manage it.

“Life
is always about trade-offs, whether we build a hydroelectric dam and
dam a river, whether we put windmills in bird migration routes. We’re
trading on that balance we have to strike between energy policy, the
environmental policy and economic outcomes.”

Read original article

Share