Category Archives: WATER

Times-Colonist: Hydro Execs Paid Bonuses for Fake Profits

Share

Read this story from the Victoria Times-Colonist on more revelations from the BC Auditor General on Hydro’s shady accounting practices – this time involving hundreds of thousands in executive bonuses paid on non-existent profits.

“B.C. Hydro executives have taken home hundreds of thousands of
dollars in bonuses based on profits the province’s auditor general says
didn’t really exist. Senior Hydro officials have their performance bonuses determined in part by the corporation’s ability to turn a profit. But
auditor general John Doyle’s scathing report on the Crown corporation’s
finances, released Friday, showed Hydro actually lost money recently,
and managed to show a profit only by deferring hundreds of millions of
dollars in expenses to the future using debatable accounting methods. Nonetheless, the corporation paid out sizable incentive-plan bonuses to its CEO, vice-presidents and chief financial officer.” (Nov. 1, 2011)

Read article: http://www.timescolonist.com/business/Hydro+paid+bonuses+existent+profit/5635771/story.html

Share
BC Auditor General John Doyle recently caught Hydro covering up $2.2 Billion in liabilities, with no plan to pay it back except jacking up your power bills

Kicking the Can Down the Road, BC Hydro Style – Billions in Bogus Accounting Revealed

Share

This month (October 2011) The Auditor General of British Columbia presented his report to Government titled “BC Hydro: The Effects of Rate-Regulated Accounting”. For most folks this is not be a gripping story they will want to master. That of course is exactly what your Government is counting on.
 
To get everyone’s attention here are in his words the financial dimensions of the issue. “As of March 31, 2011, a net total of $2.2 billion in expenses had been deferred and, by government’s own estimate, the balance is predicted to grow to nearly $5 billion by 2017”. Since this is a total of deferred expenses one could add current total liabilities and get per capita liability for everyone in BC in 2017 of $4,600 at a minimum. That is for BC Hydro liabilities alone.
 
The Auditor General’s Report describes what the “Regulatory Asset Account” is about. Theoretically it is about smoothing large incomes and expenses across several years. As used by BC Hydro it has been about exaggerated use of credit to fund questionable expenditures.
 
Perhaps a personal analogy might help. Let’s say that in 2006 your house was assessed at $124,840 and you were carrying a mortgage of $65,420 plus credit card/overdraft debt of $42,350. Your real job produced $27,270 before income tax and HST. Your creditors knew that your dad was a good credit risk and in fact had co-signed your mortgage and credit lines.

Now fast forward to 2011. Your house has an assessed value of $194,790 and you have used your new equity and your dad’s credit standing to re-mortgage to $106,320 plus you now have $59,000 of short term debt. In that 5 years you have managed increase your income from your day job to $34,380. Over the five years you have also managed to run up extra expenses of $22,000 which your dad is on the hook for and you have to tell him the amount will increase for certain by $30,000 more 5 years out. Your creditors are okay with this because you have convinced them that the $22,000 and extra $30,000 of future income will materialize because you own a business that is in fact a monopoly.
 
The above values are taken from BC Hydro’s Annual Reports, only the decimals are moved. The guarantor (AKA dad) in BC Hydro’s case is every citizen of BC.
 
Since 2005 when the “Regulatory Asset Account” was zero, about $4.4 billion of expenses have been designated as accounts receivable from rate payers in BC. As the Auditor General mentioned about $2.2 billion remains today. Brace yourselves for higher rates needed to pay this off and more.
 
Erik Andersen; Economist
 

Share

BC Auditor General Blows Whistle on Hydro’s $2.2 Billion in Voodoo Accounting

Share

Read this story from the Vancouver Sun on Auditor General John Doyle’s new report, which slams BC Hydro’s bad accounting practices – which will add enormous upward pressure to Hydro’s already skyrocketing power rates.

“Questionable bookkeeping methods by BC Hydro have put ratepayers on
the hook for $2.2 billion in public debt — with no apparent plan in
place to recover the money, Auditor General John Doyle warned in an
audit report on Wednesday. Doyle said that if BC Hydro
stays with the practice of deferring large debts rather than paying them
back and balancing their books each year, the total debt will swell to
$5 billion by 2017.

At $2.2 billion, BC Hydro would need a
one-year rate increase of 60 per cent to pay off the debt. At $5
billion, the increase would be 150 per cent.” (October 27, 2011)

Read full article: http://www.canada.com/news/Hydro%20bookkeeping%20creates%20billion%20risk%20ratepayers%20auditor%20general%20warns/5619234/story.html?mid=51435

Share

Dr. Marvin Shaffer in Vancouver Sun: BC Will Lose Millions on LNG

Share

Read this essential op-ed from SFU’s Marvin Shaffer in the Vancouver Sun, exposing the real cost to British Columbians of a heavily subsidized liquid natural gas boom on BC North Coast.

“A striking feature of the government’s jobs strategy is the number of
very electric-intensive projects it entails. The strategy calls for the
development of new mines and liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities,
all of which will require very large amounts of electricity.

The
first phase of the proposed LNG plant at Kitimat in itself will
reportedly consume some 1.5 million megawatt hours of electricity per
year, or roughly one-third of the entire output of the proposed Site C
dam project.

Media commentators have questioned whether BC Hydro
will be able to supply these large new requirements for electricity.
Some worry that it will not be able to do so because of the capital
spending and other constraints that were recommended in the government’s
recent review of BC Hydro’s rapidly rising costs and rates.

However,
the real issue here is not whether BC Hydro can supply the electricity
these projects will need. It no doubt could by acquiring or developing
new sources of electricity supply. The issue is whether, or at least
under what circumstances, it should.

One thing is certain. It will
be very bad for BC Hydro and consequently all of its existing customers
if it does supply electricity to the new mines and LNG facilities at
its standard industrial rate. Under that rate, which averages less than
$40 per megawatt hour, the amount BC Hydro would receive would be less
than half the costs it would incur for the new sources of supply it
would have to acquire.” (October 205, 2011)

Share
Jimmy Pattison recently plucked Dave Cobb from BC Hydro

Could Jimmy Pattison Have an Eye on BC Hydro? Rafe Speculates Wildly

Share

How about a bit of totally nonsensical speculation of the order of “Hitler is alive and well living in Argentina”. Something utterly absurd. I bring to this speculation a very unique history – I’m the only person in captivity who’s been fired twice by Jimmy Pattison.
 
I rather like Jimmy – going out for dinner with Mary and him on his yacht, Nova Spirit, tells you a lot about the way Jimmy’s mind works, for the guests are from different genres and, as often as not, don’t speak with one another. It’s clear that Jimmy enjoys watching the way they interrelate or don’t interrelate at all. Certainly a big man in accomplishments, Jimmy carries with him, dare I mention it in this age of politically correctness, the usual symptoms of, shall we say, height challenge, which accounts for his need to be the big guy at all times, even as he is over 80, to succeed.

Stories about employees abound – the late Bill Sleeman, to whom he gave a new Rolls Royce on his retirement. Long term employees like Enzo (sorry, Enzo I’ve forgotten your surname), Bud Eberhart and Maureen Chant, to name a few, feel or felt a great loyalty to Jimmy who, when concentrating on his car company, routinely fired the month’s lowest salesman saying, “I do them no favour keeping them in a job they can’t succeed in” was his theory.
 
You know the saying, “When a husband sends his wife flowers for no reason, there’s a reason.” Enter Dave Cobb, retiring from BC Hydro after 17 months as CEO; I have no trouble understanding why Cobb would leave. You will remember Cobb’s leaked conference call to employees, in which he slammed independent power projects (IPPs); his predecessor Bob Elton evidently bit the dust on the same subject.
 
In assessing this unfolding story we must know that the BC government is bankrupting BC Hydro, and in fact have already done so. As economist Erik Andersen has explained, if  BC Hydro was in the private sector it would be in bankruptcy protection now! The reason they are not is that they can keep raising their rates.
 
From the outset, the government’s IPP policy has been to force Hydro to buy power it doesn’t need thus must either sell it at half to a quarter the price they paid for it or use it instead of their own power at a huge loss.
 
Why would a government do so silly a thing?
 
There are only two reasons: The Campbell/Clark government wants to bankrupt BC Hydro because of The Fraser Institute’s embedded “values” in the right wing unassailable tenet that there should only be private corporations because they are better business people; or, I suppose, they’re dumb as a sack full of hammers and don’t know what the hell they’re doing (I suppose we must admit of the possibility of both being true!).
 
This is the point I take leave of my senses. Jimmy Pattison has bought the services of Dave Cobb, for whom he must be paying a pretty penny – I mean this guy’s in the million a year range. What reason is there for this? (NDP leader Adrian Dix got off a good one saying that perhaps Cobb has found a Premier Clark he can work with!)
 
What if Pattison has an eye on BC Hydro? Yes, that’s what I asked – what if Jimmy Pattison, an acquisitor par excellence, buys out the jewel of the BC Crown!
 
If Jimmy were planning that, he would need someone close to home that knew where the bodies were hidden and Cobb squarely meets that criterion.
 
In the first place, Cobb is the only man in Hydro today who has admitted that these IPPs are going to wipe out Hydro’s assets. Knowing this and being the sort who can see the writing on the wall, saying, “Get the hell out before you’re tossed out”, he decided to do that.
 
Taking over Hydro is not a money-winner – at least not now – and won’t be as long as it has liabilities like $50 billion for money-losing (big time) IPPs. But what if Pattison could buy Hydro’s hardware and longstanding customers only, leaving the IPPs in the lurch with no legal rights against the government (the IPP deals were, after all, made by Hydro), nor the new BC Hydro which has no legal connection to the original one.
 
I’m admittedly groping in the dark here – I’ve never seen these private contracts. But what if the government said, “We’re expropriating your companies. Here’s the deal – take it or leave it, thanks a lot and good-by”?
 
Who better than Dave Cobb to help the lawyers and bankers to sort all this out?
 
Probably simply fantasy, idiotic conjecture. Certainly it’s just guesswork. But there have been worse conjectures…I think!
 
This for the closer – Jimmy Pattison has never winced from taking on an unusual proposition.
 
And what was that about the husband and the flowers?
 
 

Share

Hydro CEO Dave Cobb Quits to Work for Pattison Following Scathing Criticism of Liberal Energy Plan

Share

Read this story from the Province on the unexpected resignation of BC Hydro CEO Dave Cobb to work for Pattison Group.

“B.C. Hydro president Dave Cobb is stepping down after just over a
year in the job, in the latest example of the troubled relationship
between the government and the Crown corporation. In an interview
Wednesday, Cobb said it was a difficult choice to leave after just 17
months, but he has a ‘oncein-a-lifetime’ opportunity to work directly
with Jim Pattison in senior management of the Jim Pattison Group. Cobb said he will stay at B.C. Hydro until Nov. 30 to help with the organization’s transition to an interim CEO.” (Oct. 20, 2011)

Share

Private Power by the Numbers: Hugely Overpriced IPP’s Mean Soaring Hydro Bills

Share

This article was originally published in the Alaska Highway News.

Dave Cobb is president and CEO of BC Hydro. In August, he confirmed what Hydro watchers have been saying for some time: that provincial energy policy is forcing Hydro to buy electricity it doesn’t need at prices higher than it needs to pay. Mr. Cobb said that if the government’s policy doesn’t change, BC Hydro would be “spending hundreds of millions of dollars per year of ratepayers’ money with no value in return” and that Hydro would be required “to buy far more long-term power than we need.”

That means that without changes, your BC Hydro bill will be going up – a lot – when it doesn’t need to.

Cobb was talking about restrictions imposed on BC Hydro by the province’s policies, especially electricity self-sufficiency. Legislation passed last year requires that Hydro hold enough electricity by 2016 to meet all BC needs. By 2020 it must hold 3000 gigawatt hours extra. It must be able to do that in the lowest water year on record. That means BC will have surplus electricity in all years except the very worst one, which might occur once every fifty or more years.

The theory, apparently, was that all the surplus power could be sold to the United States and Alberta. But abundant low-cost natural gas has allowed them to develop their own gas-fired generation, so the export market isn’t as large as anticipated and what market there is won’t command the prices that Hydro needs to cover off the cost of what it’s committed to buy.     

Besides having to acquire more electricity than needed, Hydro is also required to buy that electricity from private independent power producers (IPP’s) operating in BC. Hydro could buy it cheaper on the open market both now and in the foreseeable future.  

Purchases are classified as non-firm, meaning electricity that isn’t available all the time such as wind or run-of-river; and firm, meaning electricity that’s always available.  

Bids from IPP’s to supply electricity to BC Hydro recently came in at an average of $100 per megawatt hour for non-firm and $124 for firm.  Recent spot market prices ranged from a low of  $4.34 for non-firm to a high of $52.43 for firm. Firm power with delivery in 2012 was recently listed at $27-35 on the Pacific Northwest wholesale market. The further into the future you go, the less reliable the price predictions. Keeping that in mind, the 2030 price is suggested to be in the range of  $81-85 per megawatt hour. So relying on the best information available, it seems BC Hydro is being forced to pay artificially high prices for electricity.  

Buying high and selling low doesn’t work for long. So who will pick up the shortfall between what Hydro is paying and what it can sell the electricity for?  

Well, that would be you, BC Hydro customers.

That Energy Act requires that the electricity rates be high enough that Hydro can recover the costs of that electricity it is required to buy.  So your rates go up to cover “spending hundreds of millions of dollars per year of ratepayers money for no value…”

Although rate-payers are on the hook for the costs, they have been noticeably absent from creating the policy that’s pushing up Hydro rates. If there’s to be a change in provincial electricity policy, then rate-payers will have to stand up and insist that seeing as they’re footing the bill, they want their interests to be protected.  

Gwen Johansson has served on numerous energy-related endeavours. She co-chaired the Northeast Energy & Mines Advisory Committee; served on  BC Hydro’s Integrated Electricity Planning Committee; is a former BC Hydro Director and a former member of the BC Energy Council. She lives in the Peace Valley near Hudson’s Hope.


Share

Site C About Highly Subsidized Industrial Power, Not Powering BC Households

Share

Read this article from the Globe and Mail, revealing the fact that Site C and other big power projects in BC are really about supplying highly subsidized electricity for shale gas and coal mine development.

“The industrial megaprojects that provide the backbone of Premier
Christy Clark’s jobs plan will require a huge increase in British
Columbia’s electricity capacity – the equivalent of nearly three new
Site C dams. BC Hydro, in the midst of a cost-cutting exercise
after the Premier demanded the Crown corporation rein in rate increases,
is now under orders to ensure enough energy for three new liquefied
natural gas plants and eight new mines.” (Oct. 11, 2011)

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/british-columbia/bc-politics/clarks-jobs-plan-needs-huge-power-hike-bc-hydro-says/article2196954/

Share

SFU Report Calls for Drastic Water Conservation Reforms

Share

Read this story from The Tyee on a new report from the Adaption to Climate Change Team at SFU, urging drastic water conservation reforms in BC.

“The report outlines a new national proposition on water that aims to
strengthen Canada’s economy and ensure its environmental
sustainability, while at the same time enhancing our nation’s adaptive
capacity in the face of growing climate change effects…We are beginning to experience deeper and more
persistent droughts, and these are very costly. We’re also
beginning to experience the same intense rainfall and flooding events
that are becoming more common widely elsewhere in the world.”(October 5, 2011)

http://thetyee.ca/Blogs/TheHook/Environment/2011/10/05/SFU-Water-Report/

Share
BC Auditor General John Doyle

AG Slams BC Liberals’ Bogus Accounting, Massive Hidden Debt

Share

Forward by Rafe Mair

We now know that the BC Campbell/Clark government has deceived the public hugely in their financial statements. Below is a blog from our expert independent economist, Erik Andersen. BC Auditor General John Doyle has exposed this deceit and Mr. Andersen sums it up thusly:

“This is serial lying and a practice regular financial institutions would be fined and/or go to jail for. In your personal life you would not tolerate receiving financial statements that are either deliberately incomplete or deliberately misleading.”

Mr. Andersen writes below, “The burning issue here is why should taxpayers expect or tolerate anything less from those who collect and disburse those taxes?”

Supporters of the Liberals continue to plead the case that the NDP government of 1991-2001 were horrible managers of our money and that they, the Campbell Government, being great managers of business, have put things right – so, they say, don’t let the NDP get in and ruin us ahead.

Erik Andersen is too polite a man to say it but I will: This is a goddamned lie, for the facts released by the Auditor General show that since the Liberals came to power they have tripled the provincial debt!

How have they been able to do that?

By hiding debt in Public-Private Partnerships, a system that both Premier Campbell and then-Finance Minister Colin Hansen – in a conflict of interest that takes the breath away – helped to manage and who received honours from these same private sector partner organizations. That amount plus the hidden costs of private power contracts has enabled the government to hide its debts in a manner that the Auditor General has roundly criticized.

It is of interest and importance that Erik Andersen has been talking about this and been in touch with the AG for several months on this and related issues.

Erik Andersen has no political ties whatever.

Now, over to Mr Andersen…

——————————————————————————————

For those in government responsible for causing the Auditor General to have to write his recent damning report, “Observations on Financial Reporting: Summary Financial Statement 2010/11”, it must be embarrassing. What he and his team have written is a documentation of deliberate acts by folks we think are working in the public’s interest and who even sometimes think they are entitled to bonuses and great pensions.

The following quotations from the full report have been selected to illustrate two conditions. First is that the government’s financial statements are deceits. Second is that these deceits are deliberate.

From his letter of transmission to the Speaker of the House, Bill Barisoff, the AG writes the following:

“This report explains why I had to qualify my opinion on government’s Summary Financial Statement, as well as why I removed two of the three qualifications that were in my prior year’s audit report, despite the fact that government has not corrected these errors.”

Just to not have the reader miss the point, “qualify my opinion” is a polite way of describing a condition that is quite unacceptable to a person with high professional standards – you know, the kind of person you want looking after your personal financial affairs.

From page 5 one can read the following remarks as to how matters financial came to be in such a sorry state in BC:

“My audit opinion for the 2010/11 fiscal year contains one audit reservation, indicating that the financial statements are not in compliance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). This is one of the three audit reservations that featured in my 2009/10 opinion.”

Mr. Doyle goes on to write, “Government had amended the Budget Transparency and Accountability Act (BTAA). The amendments set the stage for the B.C. government to depart from reporting its financial statements under Canadian GAAP. Recently government took the next step by amending the BTAA to change its future definition of GAAP for BC Hydro’s rate regulated balances, which are very significant. I remain very concerned that government is choosing to override the independent standard-setting process.”

So to rephrase, government has used its legislative power to redefine accounting standards to accommodate its deceit. The principal beneficiary of this accounting trickery is BC Hydro. I hope no one is prepared to suggest that by this deliberate act of deception the people of BC, who own and guarantee the debts of BC Hydro, are better off – because if there is such a person out there we all want to know of you.

On page 7, the “recommendations” to government are presented.

It starts off asking for honesty in disclosure of debts. Featured further on is a concern about contracts that need full disclosure.

Featured on page 15 is a discussion on the use of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The AG points out that IFRS does not permit the use of rate-regulated accounting as has and is being done at BC Hydro. In fact the rate-regulated assets at BC Hydro in Mach 2011 totaled a breathtaking $2.160 billion! This account was zero as recently as 2005.

To put the cap on what is so horribly wrong with BC and BC Hydro’s finances, read page 17:

“As a result of this legislation, government has taken it upon itself to define GAAP, rather than following the standards set by the Canadian Accounting Standards Board. It concerns us that government is willing to override the due process that is involved in the setting of Canadian accounting standards, and instead legislate an accounting result that will have a significant effect on the financial statements of BC Hydro and the Province’s Summary Financial Statements.”

Our Auditor General has given us “smoking gun” evidence that proves our government is addicted to deception. What are you going to do about it?

Perhaps now folks will take seriously the representation that government has crafted a design to take BC Hydro private. How much more legislation needs to be presented as evidence in support of such an assertion before the media and public finally deal with what is so obviously occurring right under our noses?

Share