Category Archives: Canada

Horgan Puts Private Power Industry on Notice

Share

EDITOR’S NOTE: Over the past several weeks, The Common Sense Canadian has published the energy positions of the BC First Party and NDP leadership hopeful Mike Farnworth. Now we are pleased to bring our readers a statement from NDP leadership candidate John Horgan.

—————————————————————————————————————————————–

Early on in my campaign to lead the BC NDP, I put independent power producers on notice that a John Horgan-led government will immediately put a moratorium on run of river power projects and conduct a review of existing power purchase agreements to determine if they are in the public interest. That might not make me many friends, but it’s the right thing to do.

The days of secret agreements that guarantee huge profits for private power operators at the expense of ordinary ratepayers will be over. The days of pet projects at the whim of politicians without any regard for the public interest will be over too. I would immediately move to restore the BC Utilities Commission to its rightful place as an independent oversight body that looks out for all British Columbians.

I was part of the Mike Harcourt administration that encouraged run of the river power projects – but only when it made sense. We had a plan that would see small communities served by true micro-hydro projects that would get them off diesel generators. Our plan required projects to be small in scale, without fish implications, and built for local energy needs.

But the BC Liberals saw the potential for their friends to make a buck (A LOT of bucks!), and the result of their ideologically driven agenda is what you see today – a crippled BC Hydro forced to jack rates by 50 per cent to keep up to rising costs from tens of billions of dollars in contractual obligations so their rich friends can get richer on the backs of British Columbians.

The reckless energy policies culminated last June when the government forced the so-called Clean Energy Act through the legislature with closure and no debate. Now our new “families first” premier has instructed her new energy minister to find a way to keep those rate hikes low because we’re heading into an election and she wants to appear the hero. That is just not good enough. The Clean Energy Act needs to be revisited and may need to be re-written completely, and I am committed to doing that as Premier of British Columbia.

As the BC NDP’s energy critic over the past five years, and an energy advisor to NDP governments in the 1990s before that, I recognize that energy issues are inextricably linked to environmental issues. That’s why I have embedded the two into my comprehensive environmental protection plan, and made that plan one of four key priorities of my campaign along with economic growth and social justice, education and training, and honest government.

My plan for the environment includes addressing climate change and creating a real green energy plan, protecting our environment including reinvesting in parks and the land base, providing real land and water stewardship, and protecting our ocean and coastline. I am committed to restoring the integrity and strength of our environmental assessment process that was groundbreaking when we introduced it in the 1990s, but has been seriously eroded under a decade of BC Liberal rule.

I will work with the environmental and business communities, working people, and experts to develop effective ways of reducing our carbon footprint, conserving energy, and protecting our natural environment. I also believe that we must create opportunities for young people to acquire skills necessary to build and compete in the new green economy. That includes replacing a plan to spend a billion dollars on smart meters with a plan to make a smart investment in home energy retrofits.

My environmental plan won praise from the Wilderness Committee when I was the first to release one. Gwen Barlee said, “Horgan’s environmental platform is far-reaching and comprehensive. It makes a commitment to a healthy environment and sets the bar for other leadership candidates to follow.” Noted environmental activist Vicky Husband recently told The Tyee, “[John Horgan has] shown a very strong environmental bent and sense of responsibility. If he becomes leader of the opposition, the environment will become a major issue.”

British Columbia is a commodity based economy that is transitioning to a new green economy. That transition will require us to both protect our environment and invest in green technology development and training to ensure British Columbians have the skills to take on the jobs of the future. Under my leadership, an NDP government will ensure that the natural legacy we inherited from those who came before us is protected for those who will come after us.

Share

Worm Turns for Private Power as NDP Leadership Hopefuls Get It

Share

The chickens are, at long last, coming home to roost! The Campbell Government’s Energy Policy, now Christy Clark’s, is being seen for what it is – an egregiously ideological giveaway to large corporations. Even that Liberal suck, the Vancouver Province calls the policy “folly”. Yes, after 8 years of silence, of indifference, the Province in one word describes a policy it has, by its silence condoned for nearly a decade – a policy they and the rest of the media could have likely stopped had they chosen to deal with it. Meanwhile, the Vancouver Sun, having a Fellow of the Fraser Institute, Fazil Milhar as editor of the Editorial Page, has indeed by its silence kept the spotlight off this massive giveaway of our province.

The evil consequences of BC’s current energy policy, drafted in large part by Alcan in its move way from smelting aluminum into a big-time energy producer, are many.

As official spokesman for The Common Sense Canadian, I’ve spoken throughout the province and found one constant obstacle: people find it difficult to believe that any sane government could come up with such a policy. They’re starting to realize that they’re right – no sane government would:

  • Forbid BC Hydro from developing any new public power projects (Site C, exempted, is not a “new” project – it’s been on the books for decades)
  • Give all development to private companies with secret sweetheart deals
  • All but give them licenses to use our rivers (the original price for a private power water license was around $170)
  • Force BC Hydro to buy this private power at almost 3 times what they pay for it or some 9-12 more than they can make it themselves, thus placing BC Hydro in a position that if they were in the private sector, they would be headed for bankruptcy.

That’s right folks – these private power projects can’t store much energy, meaning it must be used when it’s created. Because they can’t generate much power when their rivers are low, which they generally are except during the annual spring run-off – when we need their power the least – BC Hydro gets stuck with power it must use or sell at a huge loss.

One cannot blame people for not believing this. It is indeed incomprehensible. But it’s true.

It’s so hard to believe that the NDP in the ’09 election didn’t make this into the big issue of the campaign.

The worm has turned – not implying that the NDP are worms! – and the leading candidates for their leadership have clearly stated that there will be no more of this sweetheart cronyism and that the secret contracts must be opened up to the public’s scrutiny.

You will recall that during the Liberal Party’s leadership process this environment/energy issue wasn’t debated at all. It was if it simply didn’t exist! Assuming that the NDP select either Mr. Farnworth or Mr. Horgan, this issue is automatically in the forefront of the debate and must be dealt with – as long as the NDP keeps its nerve.

On a related matter, John Cummins, leader of the Conservative Party, has long been an ardent foe of the Liberals’ Energy Policy and even if, which I don’t believe, the NDP were to lose their nerve, the Conservatives won’t. With no seats going into the race, and with Mr. Cummins’ reputation for fighting for what he believes in, the Liberals will finally be forced to face the music.

Finally, what will Mr. Campbell do now?

On the Liberal leader election night, Mr. Campbell was said to be in Washington, DC. This is not the time of year he normally takes a vacation there and it would be interesting to know what his itinerary was.

My guess is that some plumy directorships will be coming his way from grateful titans of industry.

Share

Rafe in the Tyee: BC Liberals in Bed with P3 Industry

Share

I want you to use your imagination, hard as it might be
under the circumstances. Suppose there is an NDP premier (see, I told
you it would be tough!) who, it’s disclosed, is the honorary chairman of
the B.C. Government Employees Union and let’s suppose the BCGEU grants
him prizes for his good service to the unions involved, including the
highest award they can bestow.

Now, you might just ask how can a
government that has to negotiate for us with the union have its leader,
our premier, supping at the union’s table, drinking their mead,
surrounded by their bonhomie, winning prizes, and then sit on the other
side of the table and negotiate as hard as nails on our behalf?

I ask you, Premier Christy Clark, what you
would say if you were the opposition leader and it became clear that
Premier Farnworth, or Horgan, or Dix was that premier?

You would be apoplectic! Admit it! And you
would be right for there before your eyes would be the clearest possible
big-time conflict of interest. Not a perceived one but a real one where
a premier, with the trust of the people’s purse, is encouraging those
who want a chunk of that money that he “is one of them.”

Hold that thought because I want to speak for a moment about public-private-partnerships or what they call P3s.

This is the deal in a nutshell. Usually
without any bidding, a favoured corporation does a deal with the
government that guarantees them a minimum cash flow to satisfy lenders;
in fact, lenders require a cash guarantee for more than the
projected cost of construction so a deal, always sweet, nearly always
secret, is struck. You rely upon the government to assure you that your
money is wisely spent and your premier is working both sides of the
street.

This, from the book titled Public Service; Private Profits by John Loxley, published in 2010 (pages 7-8):

“The P3 concept [in Canada] has benefited from the lobbying efforts of
organizations like the Canadian Council for Public Private Partnerships
(CCPPP), an increasingly strong lobby group, which was established in
1993 and draws its membership from both the private and public sectors.
In 2009, it had fifty-eight sponsors, fifty-seven of which were
companies with commercial interests in P3s, such as construction
companies, banks and their financial offshoots, bond houses and bond
rating agencies, lawyers and consulting companies such as SNC-Lavalin,
RBC Capital Markets, John Laing, Carillion, Deloitte and Touche,
Bombardier Transportation and United Water.

“… the CCPPP has a solid membership and financial base on which to
promote P3s and has been able to attract prominent politicians and
ex-politicians into its fold, such as PREMIER GORDON CAMPBELL of B.C.,
who is currently (2009) the honorary chair. The CCPPP can be considered
the main ideological proponent of P3s in Canada.” (My emphasis)

It takes barely a second to appreciate that
here in B.C. we have had a premier and cabinet pretending to look after
the public interest while concurrently and aggressively looking after
the interests of private P3 partners. It is difficult not to imagine a
more blatant demonstration of conflict of interest.

Giving and getting awards from P3 industry

This from the Dec. 4, 2010 press release by the CCPPP.

“A Gold Award for Infrastructure was presented to the Canada Line in Vancouver, BC, partnership of Canada Line Rapid Transit Inc. and InTransit BC Limited Partnership and the Sea-to-Sky Highway
Improvement Project, partnership of British Columbia Ministry of
Transportation and Infrastructure and Sea-to-Sky Highway Investment
Limited Partnership with participation by Partnerships BC.

“A Silver Award for Project Financing was presented to the Royal Jubilee Hospital Patient Care Centre,
British Columbia, partnership of Vancouver Island Health Authority and
Health Care Projects Canada Ltd. Silver Award for Infrastructure went to
Golden Ears Bridge (British Columbia), partnership of Translink (South Coast BC Transportation Authority) and Bilfinger Berger Project Investments Inc

An Award of Merit for Project Financing was also handed out.

… recipients of the Champion Award [have] included the Hon. Gordon Campbell, Premier of BC, Pierre Le François, the late James MacLaren, Donald Macdonald, Mac Carson, Glenna Carr, the late Chuck Wills, Gary Collins and Michael H. Wilson. Premier Campbell continues as the Honourary Chair of The Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships…” [My emphasis]

And, who do you suppose Gary Collins is?

You got it — our former finance minister
who, along with the premier, was saved by the bell from having to
testify in the Basi-Virk “trial.”

‘Stinging rebuke to Macquarie model’

There is also the curious case of the
Macquarie group which is a prominent fiscal agent for the B.C.
government and other public agencies and itself a big player in the P3
game.

Here is what Michael West of the Sydney (Australia) Morning Post reported back on April 4, 2008

“New York-based corporate governance
service RiskMetrics Group has delivered a stinging rebuke to Australia’s
infrastructure sector, and in particular the ‘Macquarie Model’ which
has … spawned a generation of toll-roads, airports, telecommunications
and power generation stocks.

“In the most detailed independent research
of Macquarie Group and Babcock satellites to be published, Risk Metrics
critiques the financially-engineered infrastructure model for its high
debt levels, high fees, paying distributions out of capital rather than
cashflow, overpaying for assets, related-party transactions, booking
profits from revaluations, poor disclosure, myriad conflicts of
interest, auditor conflicts and other poor corporate governance.

“RiskMetrics is a leading adviser to
institutional investors both in Australia and overseas … [this] is the
first time they have strung all the pieces together, and raised doubts
about the model’s viability…”

The above situation was made clear, by
private letter, to Premier Campbell yet the Macquarie Group continues to
take part in P3 operations with the province and is still prominent in
P3 contracts here.

Citizen suckers in a rigged game

One more point before I sum up — the P3
arrangement is supposed to remove the risk from the province of B.C. It
does no such thing for if the private company defaults, the province is
liable.

What we have here are sweetheart deals for
large corporations, which get selected without a proper or often any
bidding process and, if the going gets tough, can and do demand more
money from the province.

Far from a monetary benefit for us taxpayers, in fact the evidence is clear that we pay more.

We’re the suckers in the Three-Card Monte game run by big business and government “carnies.”

Now the clincher. Surely at the very least,
taxpayers would expect the negotiations between the province and
private companies to be at arm’s length, not between buddies.

In fact, this is outrageous. I think of
Bill Vander Zalm, who got into trouble for using Government House to
entertain a potential buyer of Fantasy Gardens and had to resign. That,
in my view, pales into insignificance compared to the conduct of
Campbell and Collins.

Why worry about this now they’re both gone?

Because Premier Clark and all other
Liberals are running on Campbell’s record. That record now includes
sweetheart deals with huge companies that were repaid by honours
recognizing him not as a good premier but a valued friend to the private
construction industry doing business with the government.

It’s pretty clear, isn’t it, why Gary
Collins and Gordon Campbell didn’t want to appear at the Basi-Virk
trial, where they would have been cross-examined on dealings analogous
to the big giveaway of BC Rail.

I recommend all recent P3 contracts be
examined by an out-of-province forensic accountant to determine the
scale of any unearned premium and conflict-of-interest evidence and, if
necessary, advise that the contracts ought to be re-opened.

As to the future, Premier Clark must
acknowledge this outrageous conduct and assure us that the corrupt
practice of P3 contracts is at an end and that hereafter all
government-funded projects will go to tender, not into the corporate jam
jar.

Read original article

Share

Environment unites B.C. NDP hopefuls at leadership debate

Share

From The Province – April 2, 2011

by Cassidy Olivier

They joked around about what kind of salmon they would be, drew big
laughs with their self-deprecating humour and elicited cheers from the
packed auditorium with their directed jabs at the governing Liberal
Party.

But the main message coming out of Saturday’s B.C. NDP
leadership debate on environmental sustainability in Vancouver was a
serious one: The province needs a government who makes the environment a
top priority. And that’s what they promised to do.

Like the
previous six leadership debates, the five candidates vying for the top
job differed little on the policy issues — ranging from water
stewardship to pollution taxes — raised at the Creekside Community
Centre in the former Olympic Village.

All agreed that the
province’s environmental assessment process needs beefing up, that
issues of ­poverty and sustainability are inextricably linked, that
damaging practices need to be stopped and that the controversial carbon
tax needs rejigging.

Similarly, all five said they were against
Site C, the proposed mega-dam on the Peace River, the cross-province
Enbridge Pipeline project and offshore drilling.

They also expressed a need to take a closer look at B.C. Hydro’s IPP contracts.

As
John Horgan, MLA for Juan de Fuca, put it in a line borrowed from
himself Thursday in Victoria: “It’s another love-in, as you can see.
There’s not a lot to divide the five of us with respect to policy or the
issues of the day.”

The differences, then, were found in the way
they performed and the themes they pushed forward as part of their
ultimate goal of convincing party members that they are the right choice
to lead New Democrats into the future, and the best bet of beating
Premier Christy Clark at the polls.

Vancouver-Kingsway MLA ­Adrian
Dix, one of three perceived front-runners, spoke passionately about the
need for environmental assessment legislation that was “worthy of its
name.”

He said the carbon tax shouldn’t be revenue neutral and promised a rollback on the tax to fund transportation and education.

Dix also tossed the most vitriol at B.C.’s new premier, saying in his closing remarks that he “couldn’t wait” to take her on.

Earlier,
he questioned Clark’s decision to lobby the federal government on the
proposed Prosperity Mine near Williams Lake, after the feds had said the
province’s environmental assessment had been inadequate.

“Stephen
Harper’s government said no. Then the new premier of B.C. demands that
the federal government overturns its decision,” said Dix.

“You got to be pretty far out on the political fringe to be on the right of Stephen Harper.”

Mike
Farnworth, MLA for Port Coquitlam and another perceived front-runner,
spoke frequently of unity — both in terms of uniting the province under a
shared vision and progressive voters who are desperate for change.

Farnworth
spoke of ­adequately funding the Ministry of Environment so that “they
can do what they are supposed to do” and of a government that looks at
sustainability, as it applies not only to the environment, but also
public policy.

“Our best days, our best public policy is when we
do what we do best which is bring the people together,” he said. “We
don’t divide the people, we bring them together.”

Horgan, who
appears to be making a late push and arguably drew the most laughs of
the day, said the Liberals aren’t adequately protecting the province’s
resources.

He said more science needs to be applied when making
decisions that have environmental impacts, and spoke of putting forward a
strong agenda based on sustainability that the voters are proud of.

Nicholas
Simons, MLA for Powell-River Sunshine Coast, also spoke of the need to
bring in experts and seek differing opinions when making policy
decisions.

In perhaps the most eloquent close of the afternoon,
Simons, a cellist, likened his role as leader to a conductor in an
orchestra.

Marijuana activist Dana Larsen said it was critical
that we move away from a carbon-based society to one that uses more
renewable energy such as hemp.

B.C. NDP members will vote for a new leader April 17.

Read original article

Share

The Tyee: A New, Greener NDP in British Columbia

Share

From The Tyee – April 1, 2011

by Andrew McLeod

Even before British Columbia NDP leadership candidates headed into an April 2 debate in Vancouver centred on environmental sustainability, observers were noting the role green issues have had in the campaign.

That role provides a contrast both to the recent BC Liberal leadership race and the NDP’s own record in the 2009 election.

“They’re talking about issues unprompted by
us,” said Kevin Washbrook, a Conservation Voters of B.C. board member.
“Generally I’d say it has a place of prominence in the race. More so
than it did in the Liberal race.”

CVBC is evaluating Mike Farnworth, Adrian
Dix, John Horgan, Nicholas Simons and Dana Larsen’s positions and may or
may not endorse anyone, but won’t have that ready for at least another
week, he said.

The group Organizing for Change put a list of questions to all of the leadership candidates in both the Liberal and the NDP races.

“In the Liberal race it was like pulling teeth to get answers
to those questions,” said provincial OFC lead Lisa Matthaus. Of the
Liberals, just Mike de Jong answered, and he did so at the very end of
the campaign, she said.

“With the NDP they’ve all responded, except
for Dana Larsen,” Matthaus said. And since responding, they’ve
continued to release environmental positions. “It’s interesting to see
how much more the NDP is making the environment part of the debate among
themselves.”

‘Huge departure’ for NDP: Vicky Husband

All the front runners have picked up the
environmental banner, said long time environmentalist Vicky Husband, who
added she believes John Horgan is the most committed among them.

“We never saw Carole James take a strong stand on an environmental
issue,” said Husband. Comparing the race to where the NDP was in the
last election, she said, “I think it’s a huge departure. I think they
were on the wrong side, certainly on the carbon tax issue.”

While the NDP championed other important
environmental issues in the campaign, including re-evaluating
run-of-the-river hydro projects, the carbon tax position put them
offside with a large part of the environmental community, said Husband, a
past conservation chair of the Sierra Club B.C. and a veteran of
campaigns to preserve Clayoquot Sound rainforest, the Great Bear
rainforest and wild salmon fisheries.

The Pembina Institute’s Matt Horne, who was
among prominent environmentalists who denounced the NDP’s axe-the-tax
position in 2009, said the NDP candidates all support keeping the carbon
tax, though they would tweak it in various ways to make it work better.
“[It] is a significant change from where they were in the last
election,” he said.

While there’s further to go if B.C. is to meet its goals for carbon emission reductions, it’s a positive step, he said.

Platform details

John Horgan
was the first to release an environmental platform. The Juan de Fuca
MLA’s long list said he’d expand the carbon tax, invest in transit, pass
an Endangered Species Act and protect more old growth forests.

Port Coquitlam MLA Mike Farnworth’s
environmental platform includes keeping a steady amount of land in the
Agricultural Land Reserve, moving salmon farms to closed containment,
giving local governments more say on significant projects, restricting
raw log exports and planting more trees. He’d keep the carbon tax and
extend it to industrial emitters, using it to pay for transit and other
green initiatives.

Adrian Dix,
who represents Vancouver-Kingsway, would use carbon tax revenues for
transit and green infrastructure, invest in the park system and protect
endangered species and ecosystems. He’d also recreate Environmental
Youth Teams to create jobs for young people doing green work.

Read full article

Share

Campbell & IPPs: The Big Lie

Share

As Bridge players say, may I review the bidding?

Gordon Campbell has gone into retirement but anyone who thinks he won’t be rewarded by industry for all his hard work for them ought to be showing some interest in Florida swamp lands.

The part of Campbell’s tenure that most concerns me is his record on Independent Power Projects (IPPs), where he employed the well known theory that if the lie is big enough and you let it run for enough time, people will believe it.

On the IPP issue Campbell not only used the “Big Lie” technique, he was much aided by a tame if not captive media. It’s important to note this, for one can fool the public either by dealing with the issues thoroughly or not at all. The BC mainstream media has chosen the latter method and it’s worked magnificently for Campbell.

 There is a new factor which I’ve dealt with in the past but it’s come to the fore forcefully thanks to economist Erik Andersen.

 First let’s examine what we know about IPPs.

  • They create environmental nightmares      
  • They have sweetheart deals with BC Hydro which has been mandated by the government to give them
  • Most IPP power comes at a time BC Hydro doesn’t need the power
  • Even though it doesn’t need the power, under the “take or pay” clause BC Hydro must take it
  • BC Hydro, having been forced to take IPP power has two choices – export it at less than half of what it was forced to pay for it or use it at 12 times what it can create its own power for.

I can’t believe this situation which rivals and perhaps exceeds the crooked mayor who gives long term sweetheart deals to his brother-in-law.

What Campbell has done is to bury these facts from the public by stating the egregious falsehood that BC needs private power because it must import power. This scares people who fear that without IPPs we will literally be in the dark. The crucial point is that if BC was short of energy, the last place they could get it would be IPPs which produce the bulk of their power during the annual spring run-off.

A new wrinkle has been added: BC Hydro is seeking permission from the BC Utilities Commission for massive rate increases, ostensibly for renovations and stuff like that.

In their proposals and indeed in their other financial statements you see the Sherlock Holmes famous dog barking scenario where the whole point of the case was that the dog didn’t bark. So it is with these sweetheart deals. For what’s missing from this whole mess is a financial statement from BC Hydro that shows the ever increasing liabilities of some $50 BILLION to these IPPs which will cost it well in excess of a billion a year for up to 40 years! We’re talking about in excess of $1 billion a year and growing! . As the late American senator Everett Dirksen once said “A billion here, a billion there, pretty soon it adds up to real money.”

All of these deals have a COLA clause to cover any inflation that might occur!

Pretty neat, huh! How would you like a deal like this where, no matter what you do, you can’t go broke?

There is no doubt that under these circumstances if BC Hydro were in the private sector it would be seeking bankruptcy protection. The only reason BC Hydro is not bankrupt is that it has a steady flow of income which can be raised if necessary – you and me and BC industry who must pay more and more to cover BC Hydro’s commitments and shortfalls.

Why aren’t we being told by the government about this mess – about how we are sacrificing our environment so that companies like General Electric can literally steal our power?

In fact it’ worse than that for governments are actually granting money to these huge wealthy companies.

We’ve been taken for fools by the Campbell government and the pliant media. Gordon Campbell gets praise whereas he should get his second sojourn in the slammer.

The dog hasn’t barked and the biggest giveaway BC has ever seen goes unexplained by the government and unnoticed by the media.

 

Share

Public Power for the Public Good

Share

The Common Sense Canadian is pleased to provide the following guest article by BC NDP leadership candidate Mike Farnworth, detailing his vision for the future of our energy policy in BC. We hope to provide you with statements from the other NDP leadership candidates in the lead-up to the party’s April 17 vote.

—————————————————————

There’s a discussion that needs to take place in this province around the legacy of one of British Columbia’s greatest builders.
 
That person was W.A.C. Bennett. Partisan politics aside, all British Columbians owe the first Premier Bennett a debt for his leadership in creating B.C. Hydro, and establishing the importance of public, large-scale hydroelectric power to both our province’s economic development and environmental protection.
 
The vision that he showed back in the 1950s and 60s has served this province well to the current day, and that vision is public power for the public good. It is a vision that I believe in, and one I am committed to fighting for as leader of the BC NDP, and as Premier of the province.
 
It’s a vision we need to build on, but also one we need to protect. As I’ve said throughout my campaign, I believe that our social and economic development must be developed through the key lens of sustainability. And public power is one of the most sustainable public assets we have, one that must be protected.
 
That is why a key part of my extensive environmental policy platform has been to protect these assets. I have committed to:

  • Ending the sell-off our public assets by placing a moratorium on all new independent power projects (IPPs);
  • Ending the secrecy surrounding IPPs by opening up all existing power purchasing agreements to public review and scrutiny, and, where possible end or amend agreements that don’t serve the public interest; and,
  • Reinstating independent oversight of the BC Utilities Commission.

The development of independent power projects, and in particular the run of the river projects, have largely taken place behind closed doors, and in a vacuum of a broader strategic discussion about the true nature of our energy needs in B.C.
 
The question of the downstream benefits, and the Columbia River Treaty, is up in 2024. Those benefits will then return to us. When we look at how our energy policy should be shaped, at what direction public power development should take, we need to be taking these factors into account, and openly engaging the public.
 
And because this is such a vital public resource, the public does have a right to transparency where the existing IPP contracts are concerned. The government should be able to answer the questions about what’s in the contracts, why are we paying more, and should we be paying more. We need to bring some clarity and some openness into the IPP agreements that have been signed. We need to have somebody independent going in and looking at them, such as the Auditor General for example, and determining whether those contracts are in the public interest.
 
We also need to restore the oversight capacity of the B.C. Utilities Commission. When you strip away public oversight, as the BC Liberal government has done, and you strip away environmental oversight on projects under a particular size, people rightly start asking questions. We need to return people’s faith to public power.
 
Because at the end of the day, this is a public resource. We own it. Public power has been one of the best economic advantages this province has had, and can and should continue to have for generations to come.
 
It can generate energy for many, many years. We buy power in the middle of the night, when the generators are going. We turn off the generators on our dams, and our reservoirs fill up. And in the morning, we sell our own power at peak price. That’s a good business deal to me, it’s a good deal for our environment, and it’s a good deal for British Columbians.

You can find out more about Mike Farnworth’s comprehensive plan for the environment here.


Share

Clark Administration: Early Election, BC Hydro

Share

Rumors are flying as Christy Clark hits the premier’s office running, including an election for next September. This will happen if the premier decides that as time goes on her chances of winning will not likely improve.

The NDP leader will not have had much time to present his platform.

The NDP may emerge from their leadership convention snapping at each other – which is normal for them.

Premier Clark may have won the HST debate.

After some time in the Legislature, the new Liberal government, whose best argument is that Campbell has left, may present a new and better image even though they all participated in supporting him.

The downers are significant, one of which could be fatal – the combination of a strong NDP leader and a threat to the right wing by a John Cummins-led Conservative Party.

There is, of course, a huge issue Premier Clark wants to avoid until she has a mandate…it’s called BC Hydro.

Hydro, were it in the private sector, would now be heading for bankruptcy protection. And this leads to another rumor this time from Cope 378 (the union representing many BC Hydro workers) which raises the specter of BC Hydro being split in three and some if not all of the pieces being sold privately. An interesting fact is that when Hydro puts its case to what’s left of the BC Utilities Commission they conveniently overlook the some $50 BILLION in commitments to private power companies.

This raises the name Rich Coleman who is the new Minister of Energy and has made noises about holding Hydro’s feet to fire re: their proposed significant raise in electricity charges. Minister Coleman is seen as a tough, hard-nosed guy whose appointment is supposed to have telegraphed a message to a population not too keen about an increase in rates that BC Hydro will have to deal with.

I smell a rat – no offense Mr. Coleman.

If the minister truly wants the public t know about their energy company he will announce that he will release the cozy contracts virtually given to private companies and will do so immediately. He would restore zoning rights to local governments. He would make it clear that as government policy Independent Power Producers (IPPs) would receive no licenses and no environmental permits until the whole energy plan is out in the open. He would also restore independence to the BC Utilities Commission.

I don’t believe these things will happen because Premier Clark does not want the Energy policy and the ruinous, sweetheart contracts to be an election issue. My bet is that Coleman will mount some sort of inquiry which delays public debate until the election is, safely he hopes, behind him. Coleman will bob and weave and avoid. A combative man by nature – so I’m told – Coleman will bluster, equivocate, play the role of the Ink Fish and generally confuse the voting public.

This technique will be met with opposition from the Common Sense Canadian, opposition which will take Damien and me around the province. After recent events on Vancouver Island in Port Alberni and Tofino a couple of weeks ago, will be in Williams Lake and Quesnel this coming weekend, followed by the Okanagan the week after. By the time we’re finished we’ll have visited every region of the province carrying the message of the financial horror the government has visited on BC Hydro and showing the calamitous environmental damage this policy causes.

We will support politicians who stand for saving BC Hydro and our environment and oppose those who don’t. No more complicated than that.

But there is more to it than just that. We cannot with our limited resources fight all the battles under the environment ‘brolly but we stand with those who fight fish farms, battle to keep the ALR intact and stand by opposition to shipping Oil Sands crud by pipeline and tanker through BC and down its coast.

Does this mean we’re anti-business? An emphatic no! We’re against bad business.


Fish farms can stay if they’re in closed-containment. If the fish farmers say they can’t handle that we say this means you need BC to subsidize you by allowing you to ravage the environment and our wild fish. In effect, the damage that happens to our wild salmon becomes a dividend in the hands of foreign companies.

With pipelines one must remember that there are no risks involved but certainties waiting to happen. The consequences will be – not might be – horrific damage to our precious environment.

We stand shoulder with those who fight to preserve farmland. Quite apart from all other valid arguments, why would we, given what we see happening around the world, jeopardize our food supply?

Neither Damien or I support any political party and certainly not socialists. I ran and won against the NDP twice and if the circumstances were the same today as they were in 1975 and I was that young again, I’d do it all over again.

BUT…the issues we at the Common Sense Canadian are concerned with are not about left and right but right and wrong.

As we go into the campaign flat out, I hope you will support us as we battle to save our power company and our environment.

 

Share

Judge orders BC Rail documents returned or destroyed!

Share

Fromt he Globe & Mail – March 15, 2011

by Mark Hume

Copies of more than one million pages of documents related to a
political corruption trial, including confidential material from B.C.
government cabinet meetings and internal e-mails among MLAs, must be
destroyed or returned to the Crown.

In a decision released
Tuesday, Associate Chief Justice Anne MacKenzie of the Supreme Court of
British Columbia ruled that Dave Basi, Bob Virk and Aneal Basi cannot
retain documents they obtained through disclosure in the BC Rail case.

She stated the three former government employees only had the
material, which included RCMP files, to prepare their cases – and they
are not entitled “to use the material for purposes collateral to making
full answer and defence in this proceeding.”

Dave Basi and Mr.
Virk, former ministerial aides who were convicted on fraud and breach of
trust charges, had argued they should be able to keep the documents and
to release them in the event of a public inquiry into the sale of BC
Rail.

Aneal Basi, a low-level former government information
officer, against whom charges of money laundering were dropped, had
wanted to retain the material for use in possible future litigation.

But
Judge MacKenzie said when the material was released to them during
disclosure, all three were bound by an implied undertaking, and that
undertaking has not expired even though the trial has ended.

She
ordered lawyers for the three men to “deliver forthwith to the Office of
the Special Prosecutor or the RCMP … any and all documents disclosed by
the Crown.”

As an alternative, stated Judge MacKenzie, the
lawyers can file affidavits with the Crown saying the material has been
destroyed.

Crown lawyer Janet Winteringham said much of the
material at issue is in electronic form, but there are also substantial
paper files.

“It’s got to be over one million pages,” she said.

Michael
Bolton, Dave Basi’s lawyer, said the judgment means all the material
gathered during the long-running case will not be seen by the public.

“I
would conclude its a decision that forecloses any public access to
those materials,” he said. “I think the judgment is pretty clear.”

Dave
Basi and Mr. Virk were convicted of leaking confidential government
files in relation to the government’s $1-billion sale of BC Rail in
2003. They were sentenced to two years less a day under house arrest.

Read original article

Share

Wilderness Committee: Clark Cabinet Picks ‘Disturbing’ for Environment

Share

From Wilderness Committee Press Release – March 14, 2011

The Wilderness Committee responded with concern to the announcement
of the initial cabinet of new BC Premier Christy Clark, who was sworn in
earlier today.

“After a BC Liberal leadership campaign where environmental issues
barely got a mention, we were looking for a signal that Clark’s
government would take environmental policy and wilderness protection
more seriously,” said Gwen Barlee, Policy Director at the Wilderness
Committee.

Of particular concern is the fact the position of Minister of State
for Climate Action has been dropped from cabinet. “This is a disturbing
signal when it comes to the BC government’s duty to meet its existing
greenhouse gas emission targets,” said Ben West, Healthy Communities
Campaigner for the Wilderness Committee.

“BC’s emission reduction targets are among the most ambitious in
North America, but Premier Clark has not suggested in any way that she
will provide an adequate plan to meet these legally binding
commitments,” added West. “Clark’s dropping of any minister responsible
for Climate Action suggests the implementation of such a plan is not a
priority, and that is irresponsible and unacceptable.”

The new BC environment minister is Kamloops MLA Terry Lake, who has
no previous cabinet experience. Earlier this year, the Wilderness
Committee released its “Top 11” priorities for 2011, which included
calling for a plan to meet emission reduction targets, implementation of
provincial endangered species legislation, a Pacific coast tanker ban,
and a restoration of funding for the Ministry of Environment. (Click herefor the full Top 11 list.)

Share