Common Sense Canadian
 

Water, Water Everywhere, but for How Long? Privatizing Water in BC

9
Posted March 22, 2012 by Common Sense Canadian in WATER
Share

World Water Day (March 22nd) is a good time to consider this: Canada has nearly 10% of the world’s supply of fresh water. How lucky are we?

But what is all this water doing to earn its keep? Nothing. Or so think our politicians – and thirsty corporations like General Electric. 

In 2010, GE (according to Council of Canadians, the world’s largest water company) and Goldman Sachs (uh, oh) co-founded the World Resources Institute Aqueduct Alliance. The basic purpose of the alliance is to map (and presumably lay hands on) the global supply of fresh water. After all, as the alliance points out, “In many regions around the world, water scarcity from climate change and pollution is starting to impact a company’s performance.”

Within a year the expanded alliance included Coca-Cola, Calgary-based Talisman Energy, Dow Chemicals and United Technologies, the world’s 10th largest arms producer. (Knowing where water shortage conflicts might appear could, after all, be useful.) 

Oh, what a web these companies weave. 

In Alberta, the president of GE Canada was a member of the Premier’s Council for Economic Strategy which last year recommended the creation of a new Alberta Water Authority. The new authority would facilitate buying and selling of water licences. 

According to the council’s report, the authority would also advise on policy changes to give holders of water licenses more opportunity to sell, lease or trade some or all of their right to draw water. Such changes will allow licensees holding water allocations they are not currently using or no longer need to lease or sell this surplus to others within the watershed at a price set by market forces of supply-and-demand.” 

How bad could that be? 

Ask the government of Australia. In the 1990s exactly this sort of water market was established for the Murray Darling River Basin. A 2001 drought started a water-rights speculation frenzy. By September 2010, the Australian government had spent nearly $1.5 billion buying back water rights at inflated free market prices.  

Here in BC (where Talisman Energy already has a licence to divert up to 10,000 cubic metres (10 million litres) from the Williston reservoir every day for the next 20 years), similar plans are afoot.

The provincial government is expected to table a new Water Act in 2012. It is anticipated that the new Act will allow water licence owners (whatever the purported use licensed) to sell to the highest bidder. The new owner can arbitrarily change the licensed use from, say, agriculture to heavy industry. In a drought such as Australia’s, good luck to farmers who might need to buy water back. 

Welcome to the deregulated water market. 

Companies like Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) love it. BAM, one of two companies which shared ownership of most of BC’s public land forests and all the private land forests, is keen to get into the hydroelectricity game. (FYI, BAM director J. Trevor Eyton is also a director of Coca-Cola Enterprises.) 

We sell them the rights to our water and they sell us their electricity. No wonder EcoJustice describes BC’s proposed Water Act as a pretty sweet deal for industry.

Yes, of course most industries require water and, within reason, they should have access to it. However, instead of turning our water rights into tradable commodities, how about we maintain control of our water for the public good?

Here’s a crazy idea for World Water Day. Industries could pay for the water they use by volume. Companies might decide to reduce the water they currently waste and that would be a bonus. Whether or not they do, the people of BC could be paid a fair fee for a precious resource. Instead of paying for corporate bonuses, the money could, oh, I don’t know, pay for health care and education? Perhaps some of the revenue could be used to upgrade our crumbling infrastructure.  

Or we could carry on with plans to more or less just give our water rights away.

Miranda Holmes is an associate editor of Watershed Sentinel magazine. For more information on this topic, go to www.watershedsentinel.ca/content/ge-and-privatization-water

 

 

 

 

Share

About the Author

Common Sense Canadian


9 Comments


  1.  

    Politicians continue to believe that the transfer of assets out of the public domain and into the hands of the private sector still is in our best interests.

    Maybe so before 1950, when the environmental costs of doing business were ignored.

    No longer is this the case. If the private sector wants our water, let them buy it from us as this article recommends.software download




  2.  

    What will happen if they will be privatized? Of course, the usual bill we have will go even more than what we pay,,, and perhaps the service is not that good.




  3.  

    Animal, Billabong, Quiksilver and Ben Sherman. Whatever you’re looking for casual, comfortable and cool are easy to find in our extensive collection of cheap polo shirts for men.




  4.  

    The contents of this article, I like, very rich in contents.




  5.  
    jeanoudy

    There is no way in H**l I will stand by and watch any Canadian Gov’t, be it federal or provincial, sign any Corporate deal to sell Canadian water. If it’s the last thing I do on this earth it will be to let the powers that be know, they must NEVER sell the rights to Canadian water.

    Because of the Free Trade Act & Brian Mulroney, if even one Gov’t agrees to sell our water, then any Company in the world has the right to come and basically take the water and we as Canadians can never change our minds. I’m paraphrasing the details of course but this is basically what the rules are.

    We have seen what happens when Companies are allowed to own our natural resources & basic services where the bottom line is the only important value to them in the contract. Forget quality of care, quality of service. ie cleaning hospitals, which is an oxymoron because most hospitals aren’t clean anymore. The hundreds of 3P projects throughout the country have turned out to be a terrible Conservative backed initiative to building infrastructure. It looks good on paper but in the end there’s always a catch that the tax payer has to cover.

    But I digress, Canadians need to recognize what they have and how quick and easy it is to lose something we mostly take for granted.




  6.  

    Pragmatically, as populations increase so too will water demand and there needs to be a controlling mechanism like a license. Corporations will need to buy them and we will sell them. So the real issue is who negotiates the terms?

    Do we in BC have politicians in place to handle these difficult decisions and balance rights and interests? If we don’t, then we need to get the right politicians in the right place. Is the best choice laboring away in the wrong portfolio while someone less able is in the driver’s seat?

    We put our politicians in office and now we need to guide them. That is our responsibility today. So let’s not whine, let’s use our voices to select, test, confirm, and then support the people we can trust so they do what is best. Licensing will go forward. It is a matter of how and we can influence that.




  7.  
    Kathy Parton

    When you consider that approximately 60% of the human body is water and without it we would soon die, it seems to me that it is unethical to privatize water. Maude Barlow and The Council of Canadians have been trying for a long time to have Water made a basic human right, but with this Government we are backsliding. Instead of making a better policy to protect water, the current federal government is weakening an already weak policy to protect our water. Policies of federal government have compromised people in rural communities from making a living in traditional ways such as farming, commercial fishing or working in a sawmill. When people cannot support their families they become willing to sell things they never would have agreed to when they felt they had a secure income. I have noticed that older people who lived without water systems and had surface wells that went dry in the summer appreciate water more than younger people who have the benefit of never having lived without it. It appears nothing is sacred to this so called conservative government.




  8.  
    Roger Middleton

    Politicians continue to believe that the transfer of assets out of the public domain and into the hands of the private sector still is in our best interests.

    Maybe so before 1950, when the environmental costs of doing business were ignored.

    No longer is this the case. If the private sector wants our water, let them buy it from us as this article recommends.





Leave a Response


(required)