Common Sense Canadian

Enbridge plans major private power project on fish-bearing river

PostedNovember 24, 2013 by in Western Canada

The Clore River (Neil Ever Osborne/ILCP)

Read this Nov. 22 story from Larry Pynn in The Vancouver Sun on Enbridge’s plan to resurrect a private run-of-river project on the Clore River in northwest BC. The 120-megawatt project was abandoned by another company after it learned of the river’s significant fish values.

A numbered company owned by Enbridge, proponent of the Northern Gateway pipeline project, wants to build a major run-of-river power project on the same fish-bearing B.C. river where an earlier such project was rejected on environmental grounds.

A report by Canadian Projects Ltd. for 8056587 Canada Inc. — owned by Calgary-based Enbridge — notes that the proposed 120-megawatt Clore River run-of-river project would be located about 60 kilometres southeast of Terrace.

The river would be diverted through a 6.4-kilometre tunnel and then through a penstock (water pipeline) for the remaining 1.1 kilometres to a powerhouse before being returned to the river. A new 47-kilometre 230-kilovolt transmission line will be required to connect the project to the existing BC Hydro electrical grid.

The report, dated July 2012, notes that chinook salmon, Dolly Varden trout, rainbow trout, and mountain whitefish are thought to live in the Clore River. “Fish screens or other design considerations may be required in order to avoid entrainment or other impacts to fish should they exist.”

The plan is to have project approvals by mid-2014 and the project operational in 2016, the report said, noting the watershed is located within the traditional territory of the Haisla, Skin Tyee, and Kitselas first nations.

Pat Moss, coordinator of Friends of Wild Salmon in Smithers, said the involvement of Enbridge “goes to show that the risks they pose to this region are more than just oil spills and it further illustrates the lack of transparency we have come to expect from the company.”

The Clore River has important fisheries values and is highly valued by northwest residents,” said Moss, adding: “I predict this proposal will be rejected too.”

The waterway was the subject of an earlier controversial run-of-river proposal by C-Free Power Corp.

The company officially withdrew its plan after learning that “productive fish habitat is present throughout the entire length of the Clore River and that no barriers to migration exist,” project manager Lillian Zaremba said in a Feb. 4, 2009, letter to the province and others.

“We believe in developing only environmentally and socially responsible projects and will not pursue projects that create negative impacts on the environment or communities.”



About the Author

Common Sense Canadian


    Ruth McVeigh

    This river, I assume, is one of the ‘navigable waterways’ from which protection was removed in a recent Harper government “budget” document. Many Canadians figured this was done so that if a specific river or navigable waterway was required for oil transport, there would be no impediment.
    Here we go, eh?


    “The 120-megawatt project was abandoned by another company after it learned of the river’s significant fish values”

    This means nothing to Enbridge? This says what they really think about our BC environment doesn’t it.

Leave a Response